Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:01 AM
E150GT's Avatar
I'm a chicken
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Posts: 1,148
fuel mileage

Does everybody's gas mileage suffer horribly when you use the A/C? Especially the 420sel. It seems I fill up now twice a week when before it was once a week. I cant calculate my actual mileage because my odo dosent work

__________________
1984 300SD Orient Red/ Palomino
1989 560SEC
2016 Mazda 6 6 speed manual
1995 Ford F-150 reg cab 4.9 5speed manual
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:14 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
My daughter told me that she had heard someone say that the AC actually hurts fuel economy less that the additional drag of driving with the windows down. Anybody else ever hear that? How about you engineers out there?
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:24 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Tie your daughter to the roof, that's what I do with mine. They get to live their green opinions and I stay cool. It also makes driving the car more peaceful.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:29 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee8go View Post
My daughter told me that she had heard someone say that the AC actually hurts fuel economy less that the additional drag of driving with the windows down. Anybody else ever hear that?...
I think that is true if you are driving at highway speed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:30 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
That's a good one! Actually, she's not one of those obnoxious kids who are always evaluating your every move against something they read in a magazine. Not yet, anyhow.

So, Bot, what do you suppose the drag coefficient of a teenage girl strapped to the roof rack of an SUV is?
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:30 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin View Post
I think that is true if you are driving at highway speed.
Okay, that's good enough for me. I'll keep the AC on then.
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:48 AM
The Swede's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dee8go View Post
My daughter told me that she had heard someone say that the AC actually hurts fuel economy less that the additional drag of driving with the windows down. Anybody else ever hear that? How about you engineers out there?
I've read that.
__________________
'07 Yukon 2500
'13 Subaru Outback 3.6R
'13 Orbea Carpe 9-speed

Currently Benzless
Formerly: 300TD, S600, E55, 560SEL

---= The forest breathes, listen.
-Native American elder
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 833
I keep the A/C off and the sunroof open for as long as possible, but the last few days have changed that policy some. My gas mileage has dropped. I don't know if its the new cat I just put on, or the effect of ethanol in the gas. It has dropped from 18 to 15, even without A/C. ECU duty cycle looks normal too.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:52 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
Yeah, we had it easy for most of June, but the "Washington summer" has come now, full force.
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-27-2007, 02:19 PM
mgburg's Avatar
"Illegal" 3rd Dist. Rep.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Onalaska, WI.
Posts: 221
On "MYTHBUSTERS" - they addressed this very subject...

If I remember correctly, windows down was better than windows up and AC on.

The compressor drag uses more energy, thus increasing the fuel useage...

The other situation that could be contributing to reduced mileage may be related to the fuel's reduced volitility during warmer weather and any additional ethanol in the fuel...-
__________________
.

.
M. G. Burg
'10 - Dakota SXT - Daily Ride / ≈ 172.5K
.'76 - 450SLC - 107.024.12 / < .89.20 K
..'77 - 280E - 123.033.12 / > 128.20 K
...'67 - El Camino - 283ci / > 207.00 K
....'75 - Yamaha - 650XS / < 21.00 K
.....'87 - G20 Sportvan / > 206.00 K
......'85 - 4WINNS 160 I.O. / 140hp
.......'74 - Honda CT70 / Real 125

.
“I didn’t really say everything I said.”
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Yogi Berra ~
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-27-2007, 03:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Central Kentucky
Posts: 1,069
In one of my MB manuals, as I recall, they list the hp draw at max engine speed for the 150 cc compressor at 10 hp and the 173 cc compressor at 15 hp or thereabouts. Also, as I recall, the 126 bodies came in with a Cd of 0.39, which was supposed to be great for a car like that at the time.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page