PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/)
-   -   I spy with my little eye something ... (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/204966-i-spy-my-little-eye-something.html)

Botnst 11-11-2007 04:45 PM

I spy with my little eye something ...
 
I Spy

Amateur satellite spotters can track everything government spymasters blast into orbit. Except the stealth bird codenamed Misty.
By Patrick Radden Keefe

Sometime around dawn on the first day of the 1991 Gulf War, Ted Molczan was woken by a mysterious phone call. Molczan had been up until 3:30 am in his Toronto apartment, riveted by the televised images of Tomahawk missiles raining down on Baghdad, so he was groggy when the phone rang. A male voice with a thick accent said: "I know you're involved in satellite tracking. I'm interested in doing a trade." The caller offered Molczan information on the orbiting patterns of a constellation of eight US satellites. In exchange, he wanted to know the orbits for the CIA's KH-11 "Keyhole" satellites - from space they can discern an object as small as a softball, and they were sending US forces hi-res digital imagery of Iraq and Kuwait.
The man made no apology for the early hour and wouldn't say why he wanted the information. But one thing was clear: He had found the right guy.

Molczan, an energy conservation consultant, was just becoming known for his skill at a most unusual hobby. In his spare time, he likes to take binoculars and a stopwatch onto the balcony of his high-rise apartment and track clandestine US spy satellites. There are thousands of amateur satellite observers active today, but Molczan is a leader of an informal group of 20 or so who specialize in so-called black satellites, the orbits of which are not disclosed, and the existence of which is often classified. Molczan and his band of associates monitor some 140 classified US satellites, like the Lacrosse radar imaging satellites, which can see through cloud cover and darkness and produce photo-quality images of targets on Earth.

The observers, who congregate on a Web site called Heavens-Above and a mailing list called SeeSat-L, have amassed an impressive collection of information and expertise. For two decades, they have played a high tech game of hide-and-seek with the US's National Reconnaissance Office, a secretive satellite agency. By coordinating their efforts, amateur observers in Europe, North America, and South Africa monitor satellites at different phases of their journeys and extrapolate the precise dimensions of their orbits. Astonishingly, despite the hobbyists' modest resources - most observe part-time from their balconies and backyards with equipment available at RadioShack - they are good enough to spot almost anything the NRO, with its estimated $7?billion budget, blasts into space. That, of course, is why the mystery caller wanted to chat.

Molczan told the man that he didn't have current information on KH-11s because most of his fellow satellite spotters were based in the Northern Hemisphere and Keyholes were "out of season" in winter, obscured by Earth's shadow. "I asked, 'Well, who are you?'" Molczan remembers. "He sort of laughed and said, 'Let's just say I'm south of you.'"

The conversation lasted barely three minutes, but Molczan says it still haunts him. It made him begin to think about what would happen if the information collected by those "in the hobby" ever ended up in the wrong hands.

So far that concern hasn't changed the way he works. Fifteen years after that unsettling experience, Molczan and the network have developed an almost zoological catalog of the many secret creatures that streak across the evening sky - and they've posted everything online. But there's one satellite whose information Molczan says he might not disclose. As it happens, it's also the one he cannot find.

Since the early '90s, he has been hunting a new, supersecret breed of satellite that has become a kind of white whale for the observers and a source of considerable controversy on Capitol Hill. Codenamed Misty, it's a multibillion-dollar stealth photoreconnaissance device that took the CIA and the NRO a decade to develop and was designed to be untrackable by Soviet adversaries. It began orbiting Earth in the spring of 1990, when it prompted a high-stakes hunt that obsesses the amateurs to this day.

more at: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.02/spy_pr.html

Pete Geither 11-11-2007 06:53 PM

Fastinating.

Botnst 11-11-2007 07:36 PM

Several years ago the gov announced it was retiring the SR-71 and so the first thought is, what have they got now that is better than an SR-71?

I understand the USAF brought several back into commission recently which brings the thought, what can the SR-71 do that nothing newer can do?

Or maybe they're just using that initiative to deflect curiosity from some other endeavor.

Mind games.

Pete Geither 11-11-2007 09:01 PM

I have heard from more than one person that the military is 5 to ten years ahead of the private sector in technology. Any truth to that ? And can they really read a license plate from 100 miles up ?

Botnst 11-11-2007 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete Geither (Post 1671634)
I have heard from more than one person that the military is 5 to ten years ahead of the private sector in technology. Any truth to that ? And can they really read a license plate from 100 miles up ?

They can read the license plate but they have to take it with them.

Hatterasguy 11-11-2007 11:38 PM

I suspect they have a sply plane thats more advanced. The problem with satellite's is that you can track them. How much you want to bet that the Russians and Chinese know exactly the flight path of whatever we have up their?

A plane allows you to be much more flexable.

Hatterasguy 11-11-2007 11:40 PM

http://velocitymicroblog.com/uploade...s_4-728042.jpg

I think the Skunk Works has a new toy.

G-Benz 11-12-2007 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete Geither (Post 1671634)
I have heard from more than one person that the military is 5 to ten years ahead of the private sector in technology. Any truth to that ? And can they really read a license plate from 100 miles up ?

I would think that the military obtains it's cutting-edge technology from the private sector...what it does have is money...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website