Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:14 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
Hypermiling anyone?

Has anyone heard of this? IT's the practice of inflating tires to the maximum listed on tires (not car manufacturer). I heard a story on Howard Stern yesterday that some guy was pushing over 50 mpg in a Ranger doing this. Do you guys see any danger to doing this? Maybe early wear on tires? What says you?

__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:21 PM
hill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Calif Sacramento
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau View Post
Has anyone heard of this? IT's the practice of inflating tires to the maximum listed on tires (not car manufacturer). I heard a story on Howard Stern yesterday that some guy was pushing over 50 mpg in a Ranger doing this. Do you guys see any danger to doing this? Maybe early wear on tires? What says you?
You mean besides hitting a pothole and jumping in to the other lane and killing people?
__________________
Happy Benzing
Darryl, Hill
2005 SL55 AMG Kleemanized
1984 500 SEC
1967 W113 California Coupe
[SIGPIC]
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:27 PM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
I would think you'd wear the center of your tires out way early doing that.
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:27 PM
300EVIL's Avatar
Moderator Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Lake Geneva, WI.
Posts: 1,676
I'd hardly consider the Howard Stern Show a credible source. Over inflating tires will reduce friction losses but at the cost of traction. I'd imagine you'd gain a couple of MPG but is it worth taking the chance of wrapping your car around a telephone pole?



I think not!
__________________
Current Stable:
01 ML55 AMG
92 500E (a few mods)
87 300E (lots of mods)
00 Chevy 3500HD Diesel Box Truck
68 18' Donzi Marine
06 GT i-Drive7 1.0 Mountain Bike (with GPS!)

PREVIOUSLY OWNED:83 300SD, 87 420SEL, 88 420SEL, 90 420SEL, 86 560SEL, 86 190E 2.3-16V AMG, 94 E320


Last edited by 300EVIL; 05-02-2008 at 03:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:32 PM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
Well, gas IS getting expensive!
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:39 PM
MattBelliveau's Avatar
Gotta another one...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by 300EVIL View Post
I'd hardly consider the Howard Stern Show a credible source. Over inflating tires will reduce friction losses but at the cost of traction. I'd imagine you'd gain a couple of MPG but is it worth taking the chance of wrapping your car around a telephone pole?



I think not!
Yeah. I'm not really calling it a credible source. That's just where I heard it. Do you guys think that it would be THAT dangerous? What's the rating on most tires? Like 45#?
__________________
1989 300E 144K
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
This is more credible:

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN2952637420080429
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:50 PM
300EVIL's Avatar
Moderator Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Lake Geneva, WI.
Posts: 1,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau View Post
Yeah. I'm not really calling it a credible source. That's just where I heard it. Do you guys think that it would be THAT dangerous? What's the rating on most tires? Like 45#?
Around 60 PSI. The idea is that you have as little rubber as possible contacting the road.. Sound safe to you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contact_patch
__________________
Current Stable:
01 ML55 AMG
92 500E (a few mods)
87 300E (lots of mods)
00 Chevy 3500HD Diesel Box Truck
68 18' Donzi Marine
06 GT i-Drive7 1.0 Mountain Bike (with GPS!)

PREVIOUSLY OWNED:83 300SD, 87 420SEL, 88 420SEL, 90 420SEL, 86 560SEL, 86 190E 2.3-16V AMG, 94 E320

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2008, 03:56 PM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBelliveau View Post
Has anyone heard of this? IT's the practice of inflating tires to the maximum listed on tires (not car manufacturer). I heard a story on Howard Stern yesterday that some guy was pushing over 50 mpg in a Ranger doing this. Do you guys see any danger to doing this? Maybe early wear on tires? What says you?
I went through a hyper mileage stage (more out of the process and theories than actually trying to save money) a few years back but grew bored with it. Check out this site for lots of info. and tips: http://www.gassavers.org/
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-02-2008, 04:16 PM
300EVIL's Avatar
Moderator Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Lake Geneva, WI.
Posts: 1,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
"Wayne Gerdes, a former nuclear plant operator from Wadsworth, Illinois, and the originator of hypermiling, said he gets 40-70 mpg out of his Ford Ranger pickup truck, about doubling its official fuel consumption of 25 mpg."



Yeah, no wonder his "former" job canned him. His numbers are all off. He's probably the guy responsible for Chernobyl.

I like how the article suggests drafting... While were at it, why not ignore traffic lights and stop signs. Any time you have to stop and accelerate it's a massive waste of fuel. Oh, and drifting around turns! Now we're saving some gas!
__________________
Current Stable:
01 ML55 AMG
92 500E (a few mods)
87 300E (lots of mods)
00 Chevy 3500HD Diesel Box Truck
68 18' Donzi Marine
06 GT i-Drive7 1.0 Mountain Bike (with GPS!)

PREVIOUSLY OWNED:83 300SD, 87 420SEL, 88 420SEL, 90 420SEL, 86 560SEL, 86 190E 2.3-16V AMG, 94 E320


Last edited by 300EVIL; 05-02-2008 at 04:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-02-2008, 04:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Drafting is the key, but I don't feel safe drafting semi trailers.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-02-2008, 04:59 PM
mgburg's Avatar
"Illegal" 3rd Dist. Rep.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Onalaska, WI.
Posts: 221
I run the tires on the S-10 at max. pressure (41 p.s.i. - cold) as stated on the sidewall. I get about 1-2 mpg more than the slightly (It's a frickin' PU truck for God's sakes!) more "cushy" ride at 36 p.s.i..

Most of my driving is Interstate...65-75 mph...and I do "snuggle in" behind the semis - I let them know I'm behind them ... some don't like it so I'll back off ... others don't mind (probably company drivers) so if that's OK, I'll find that one spot that's just ahead of the closing vortex and ride that little rift...I MIGHT gain about an additional mile or two/gallon, but that's usually tempered to the lower side due to all the construction that's starting to pop up and around the area...

In the 8+ years I've been driving that thing, I've ALMOST cracked the 20 m.p.g. barrier, twice...and the way the prices are going ($3.59-$3.75/GUR/87-89 octane at this time), it's becoming a bit more of a practice...

Back on the tire front (or tread), the max./41 p.s.i. inflation technique works for me and I end up with even treadwear...on new skins, I've gotten to over 80K on two sets and had over 74K on the first...the current set is running at 22K right now...no noticable wear on them yet...and the traction is fine...I drive as the weather dictates, not despite it...

And the other thing that keeps the tires in the round and flat across the tread? I'm ROTATING them every 6k-7k miles...helps in evening out the loads on all the tires...

Now, on the Benz? Won't go there...I like that ride too much to screw around with that...
__________________
.

.
M. G. Burg
'10 - Dakota SXT - Daily Ride / ≈ 172.5K
.'76 - 450SLC - 107.024.12 / < .89.20 K
..'77 - 280E - 123.033.12 / > 128.20 K
...'67 - El Camino - 283ci / > 207.00 K
....'75 - Yamaha - 650XS / < 21.00 K
.....'87 - G20 Sportvan / > 206.00 K
......'85 - 4WINNS 160 I.O. / 140hp
.......'74 - Honda CT70 / Real 125

.
“I didn’t really say everything I said.”
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Yogi Berra ~
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-03-2008, 12:31 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
No getting 50mpg doing that alone is BS. You will increase the mileage a bit, but stiffen the ride and wear out the center of the tire.

After playing with it a bit I run about 32psi in the SDL's and that seems to work pretty well.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-04-2008, 01:00 PM
RichC's Avatar
Internal Error 404
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 963
.

If you are thinking in this direction there is a specification for tires
called rolling resistance that you may find interesting.

Basically it is a measurement of how hard it is to get the tire rolling.

Here is a link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-rolling_resistance_tires

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/05/low_rolling_res.php

Kinda wish they would add this spec to the sidewall of tires.

Have Fun !
RichC


.

__________________

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Jimi Hendrix
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page