|
|
|
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
She has a cute house on a very quiet dead end street, paid for I'll bet, and yet she can't rest until Paul doesn't set foot on this bit of grass which is much closer to his house than hers. The panhandle bit on her lot was designed so she would have driveway access to her house, which she has, not as a front yard, as her attorney calls it. Shared Driveway has not even used her carport for anything other than lawn tools as she would have to drive on Nut Job's lot to get to it. In fact, her house was designed and built with that it mind, as there is no vehicular access to the carport w/o going on NJ's lot! The whole thing started (the survey in '01) because NJ was pissed at SD for being on her land at all. Meanwhile, Nut Job and family have driven across SD's lot for some 32 years w/o a complaint from SD. I've done a bit of title searching on Contra Costa county's database to see if I can find any prior granting of easement rights. If Paul pays me, I'll do more. Could be tedious and I've already given him a lot of time over this. I'd rather he have money to pay me to continue our projects than have to shell it out to lawyers.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm sure you're right about her selling him any land. Probably wouldn't even be legal as that lot would then be left with no street access if the shared driveway arrangement were to go completely south. The El Cerrito planner I spoke with said something about near permanent easement arrangements being possible, I mentioned it to Paul, saying maybe he could pay her to do it, but he doesn't want to go there.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
Bookmarks |
|
|