PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/)
-   -   Legislation related to GITMO prisoners (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/229195-legislation-related-gitmo-prisoners.html)

Botnst 07-31-2008 09:59 AM

Legislation related to GITMO prisoners
 
HR 6615 IH

110th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6615

To provide for the transport of the enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to Washington, DC, where the United States Supreme Court will be able to more effectively micromanage the detainees by holding them on the Supreme Court grounds, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 24, 2008

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for the transport of the enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to Washington, DC, where the United States Supreme Court will be able to more effectively micromanage the detainees by holding them on the Supreme Court grounds, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Giving Inmate Terrorists More Opportunities (GITMO) Act of 2008’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) The United States Supreme Court issued an opinion styled Boumediene v. Bush on June 12, 2008.

(2) Justice Anthony Kennedy, in the court’s majority opinion, held that foreign terrorism suspects held at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba have constitutional rights to challenge their detention in United States courts.

(3) This is an obvious effort on the part of the Supreme Court to micromanage the detainment and disposition of detainees in the War on Terror who are dedicated to destroying innocent people and the American way of life.

(4) The United States Supreme Court clearly needs increased opportunity to oversee the handling of the enemy combatants, as it has seen fit to take a greater role in managing the Global War on Terror, which is a duty previously exercised by the Executive Branch.

(5) There can be no better way for the United States Supreme Court to exercise its new self-appointed war powers than to house the prisoners whom it has taken a greater role in overseeing.

SEC. 3. TRANSPORTATION AND DETAINMENT OF ENEMY COMBATANTS.

(a) Transportation- The Secretary of Defense shall immediately transport all enemy combatants detained in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to Washington, DC, where the United States Supreme Court shall hold the prisoners on the Court grounds, confined by adequate fencing.

(b) Shelter on Supreme Court Building Grounds- The Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with Justice Anthony Kennedy, the author of the majority opinion in Boumediene v. Bush, is directed to provide shelter for the detainees outside the United States Supreme Court building, but on the building grounds. The Secretary of Defense shall provide guards to watch over the prisoners and shall implement a system to ensure that the prisoners receive the appropriate amount of food and water. Should the detainees need the use of restroom facilities, they shall use the facilities inside the United States Supreme Court building. The Chief Justice, if the Chief Justice so chooses, may perform the duties of Justice Anthony Kennedy under this subsection.

(c) Guard Duty- If any of the nine Supreme Court justices desire at any time to stand guard over the prisoners, or to provide the prisoners with their meals or water, or both, then the justices shall be permitted to perform these functions whenever they want.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT.

If either the Secretary of Defense or any justice of the Supreme Court refuses to carry out their duties under this Act, then their respective department or court shall receive funding for the next fiscal year at half the level of funding appropriated for the current fiscal year, or until such time as the Supreme Court no longer desires to micromanage the prisoners who have sworn to destroy our way of life.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6615

dynalow 07-31-2008 10:18 AM

Gomer, err...Goober, err... Gohmert has waaay too much time on his hands!
:rolleyes:
Curious, where's he from?

tankdriver 07-31-2008 05:37 PM

Texas.

450slcguy 07-31-2008 05:42 PM

Now I've heard everything. What the hell is going on? Put them against the wall and shootum. Trial over.

tonkovich 07-31-2008 06:47 PM

"patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"

Botnst 07-31-2008 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonkovich (Post 1926868)
"patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"

Hackneyed phrases are the first resort of the uncreative.

tonkovich 07-31-2008 07:52 PM

" a foolish consistency is the hobgobblin of small minds "

actually "b" , i just say whats on my mind. i chose the above because i like saying the word hobgobblin.:D (even tho i probably didn't spell it right)

anyway - you seem like an easy read. well-read conservative, either a lawyer or an educator? just guessing? me - i'm just a simple unemployed house painter who ran away with the circus when i was twelve. and carjacked a few benzes. (never a w140 tho; no self respecting chop shop would touch 'em):D

MTI 07-31-2008 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 1926925)
Hackneyed phrases are the first resort of the uncreative.


Somewhere, there's a pot describing a kettle as being ebony-like.

tankdriver 07-31-2008 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mti (Post 1926944)
somewhere, there's a pot describing a kettle as being ebony-like.

lol

Botnst 07-31-2008 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MTI (Post 1926944)
Somewhere, there's a pot describing a kettle as being ebony-like.

Nonreflective surface?

LUVMBDiesels 07-31-2008 09:15 PM

I love it. Too bad it will never pass... Maybe one of W's final executive orders could be to put this in place:D

The Sups should be hearing Constitutional law cases, not micromanaging the military.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website