Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-10-2008, 10:19 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Fallen arch

Iconic stone arch collapses in southern Utah park
By MIKE STARK, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 49 minutes ago

ARCHES NATIONAL PARK, Utah - One of the largest and most photographed arches in Arches National Park has collapsed.

Paul Henderson, the park's chief of interpretation, said Wall Arch collapsed sometime late Monday or early Tuesday.

The arch is along Devils Garden Trail, one of the most popular in the park. For years, the arch has been a favorite stopping point for photographers.

Henderson said the arch was claimed by forces that will eventually destroy others in the park: gravity and erosion.

"They all let go after a while," he said Friday.

He said it's the first collapse of a major arch in the park since nearby Landscape Arch fell in 1991. No one has reported seeing it fall.

Like others in the park, Wall Arch was formed by entrada sandstone that was whittled down over time into its distinctive and photogenic formation.

The arch, first reported and named in 1948, was more than 33 feet tall and 71 feet across. It ranked 12th in size among the park's estimated 2,000 arches.

Rock has continued to fall from the remaining arms of the arch forcing the closure of a portion of the trail.

Officials from the National Park Service and the Utah Geological Survey visited the site Thursday, noting stress fractures in the remaining formation. The trail won't be opened until the debris is cleared away and it's safe for visitors, Henderson said.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-10-2008, 12:23 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 34,082
I was nowhere near it, I swear.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2008, 01:00 PM
Kuan's Avatar
unband
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At the Birkebeiner
Posts: 3,841
It's too bad they fall at a rate faster than they get formed.
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2008, 04:00 PM
Medmech's Avatar
Gone Waterboarding
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuan View Post
It's too bad they fall at a rate faster than they get formed.


Objects fall at the same rate.

On a side note, I wonder how long it did take for the arch's to form.

google heerrreees howie.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-10-2008, 04:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Wish I'd have been there for that.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2008, 04:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 833
damn gravity. Hate that.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2008, 04:44 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
At some time or other they formed faster than they fell.

If they always formed faster then they fell we would be butt-deep in arches.

If they formed and fell at a compensating rate there would be a constant number, on average.

If they always fell faster than they form we would never see them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2008, 05:06 PM
Medmech's Avatar
Gone Waterboarding
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 117
The formations are still growing which puts many of them @ 300m years and some change. When is an arch conceived? Is it when the erosion begins or able to support itself?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-10-2008, 05:08 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howitzer View Post
The formations are still growing which puts many of them @ 300m years and some change. When is an arch conceived? Is it when the erosion begins or able to support itself?
Is it conceived when nature thrusts through the barrier?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-10-2008, 05:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Atlanta.
Posts: 366
One big flood may have formed it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-10-2008, 07:02 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by cudaspaz View Post
One big flood may have formed it.
Ooooooo, I like it. Mother Nature's lower region thrust upward and was met by a gushing, viscous flood.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-10-2008, 11:25 PM
GTStinger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 150
My parents were standing beside that arch less than a month ago. Good thing they didn't delay that vacation.
__________________
Greg Schwall

1983 300SD - 465,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-10-2008, 11:26 PM
pwogaman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern, Virginia
Posts: 2,034
My arches fell, but the Army still took me.
__________________
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...aman/Fleet.jpg

Peach Parts W124.128 User Group.

80 280SL
85 300SD
87 300TD
92 300D 2.5 Turbo
92 300TE 4Matic
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-11-2008, 03:30 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 34,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
At some time or other they formed faster than they fell.

If they always formed faster then they fell we would be butt-deep in arches.

If they formed and fell at a compensating rate there would be a constant number, on average.

If they always fell faster than they form we would never see them.
Bzzz! Wrong. If it took 2 million years to form and one million to fall, I think someone might see it.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-11-2008, 07:48 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012 View Post
Bzzz! Wrong. If it took 2 million years to form and one million to fall, I think someone might see it.
Take your numbers.

It only works if they're continuously forming. If it was a one-time event 3 million years ago or longer .....

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page