|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Georgia: U.S. Watched as a Squabble Turned Into a Showdown
August 18, 2008
By HELENE COOPER, C.J. CHIVERS and CLIFFORD J. LEVY NY Times WASHINGTON — Five months ago, President Mikheil Saakashvili of Georgia, long a darling of this city’s diplomatic dinner party circuit, came to town to push for America to muscle his tiny country of four million into NATO. On Capitol Hill, at the State Department and at the Pentagon, Mr. Saakashvili, brash and hyperkinetic, urged the West not to appease Russia by rejecting his country’s NATO ambitions. At the White House, President Bush bantered with the Georgian president about his prowess as a dancer. Laura Bush, the first lady, took Mr. Saakashvili’s wife to lunch. Mr. Bush promised him to push hard for Georgia’s acceptance into NATO. After the meeting, Mr. Saakashvili pronounced his visit “one of the most successful visits during my presidency,” and said he did not know of any other leader of a small country with the access to the administration that he had. Three weeks later, Mr. Bush went to the Black Sea resort of Sochi, at the invitation of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. There, he received a message from the Russian: the push to offer Ukraine and Georgia NATO membership was crossing Russia’s “red lines,” according to an administration official close to the talks. Afterward, Mr. Bush said of Mr. Putin, “He’s been very truthful and to me, that’s the only way you can find common ground.” It was one of many moments when the United States seemed to have missed — or gambled it could manage — the depth of Russia’s anger and the resolve of the Georgian president to provoke the Russians. The story of how a 16-year, low-grade conflict over who should rule two small, mountainous regions in the Caucasus erupted into the most serious post-cold-war showdown between the United States and Russia is one of miscalculation, missed signals and overreaching, according to interviews with diplomats and senior officials in the United States, the European Union, Russia and Georgia. In many cases, the officials would speak only on the condition of anonymity. It is also the story of how both Democrats and Republicans have misread Russia’s determination to dominate its traditional sphere of influence. Rest at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/18/washington/18diplo.html?_r=1&th=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&emc=th&adxnnlx=1219107657-h5h8PKE6y2JdiLdQekqurw
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K Last edited by cmac2012; 08-18-2008 at 09:56 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Some things never change.
__________________
Question Authority before it Questions you. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I have no idea whether there is anything the US should have done differently, but once again our Secretary of State appears to be without a clue. She chastised Russia for its aggressiveness, but didn't explain why Georgia was any better. And what credibility does she have to be lecturing anyone about respecting other countries' sovereignty?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Ain't it the truth.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
"It is also the story of how both Democrats and Republicans have misread Russia’s determination to dominate its traditional sphere of influence. "
Oh goody. Let's re-elect some more wonderful Demopublicans, soon. B |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Not sure we would respond any better to Russia taking steps to include Central and South American nations in a revived Warsaw pact kind of deal.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Of COURSE it is all W's fault!
This has nothing to do with Imperial Russian ambitions nor the fact that they had effectively cut Georgia in two. The Russians want to dominate their old empire again. I am sure that they will not stop at Georgia, but will now go after the rest of the caucuses and their former Central Asian colonies. I do think that Tadjikistan would be better off under Russian domination as they seem to be unable to go it alone. However, If I were the Ukraine or Turkmeniststan I would be hitting myself over the head for giving up my nukes! I just hope that NATO does not hang Poland out to dry (Poland is a NATO mamber) when it is Warsaw's turn to knuckle under to Czar Putin
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy" Current Monika '74 450 SL BrownHilda '79 280SL FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee Krystal 2004 Volvo S60 Gone '74 Jeep CJ5 '97 Jeep ZJ Laredo Rudolf ‘86 300SDL Bruno '81 300SD Fritzi '84 BMW '92 Subaru '96 Impala SS '71 Buick GS conv '67 GTO conv '63 Corvair conv '57 Nomad |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
It can't be W's fault. He doesn't have enough of a clue to be at fault.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Everything from high oil prices to the common cold is W's fault according to some. It is a running joke to see who can blame the poor b@st@rd first
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy" Current Monika '74 450 SL BrownHilda '79 280SL FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee Krystal 2004 Volvo S60 Gone '74 Jeep CJ5 '97 Jeep ZJ Laredo Rudolf ‘86 300SDL Bruno '81 300SD Fritzi '84 BMW '92 Subaru '96 Impala SS '71 Buick GS conv '67 GTO conv '63 Corvair conv '57 Nomad |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
"It's normal for these things to empty your wallet and break your heart in the process." 2012 SLK 350 1987 420 SEL |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
According to who? It's much more like running straw-man for the other side.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Exactly.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
You are really that naive? What has Georgia being better have to do with anything? As to credibility, what difference would it have made if Thailand or Switzerland said it? Those are all words. Do you think Russia would care more if Germany or France or Spain said it? Probably not. Only you seem to think it matters. What is going to matter in the end is how much that Russian adventure is going to end up costing them vs the gain.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
and where they are going to muscle into next... If I were anywhere in the area surrounding Russia I would be *****ting bricks right now... I am sure the Azerbajani oil fields look awfully good to Czar Putin right now...
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy" Current Monika '74 450 SL BrownHilda '79 280SL FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee Krystal 2004 Volvo S60 Gone '74 Jeep CJ5 '97 Jeep ZJ Laredo Rudolf ‘86 300SDL Bruno '81 300SD Fritzi '84 BMW '92 Subaru '96 Impala SS '71 Buick GS conv '67 GTO conv '63 Corvair conv '57 Nomad |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That seems to be the way of the world. All the nice sounding, well meaning speeches are good for a laugh. Do something that affects me and watch me spew out all the moralistic crap that seems to mean something to some stupid listeners. Do something that is morally wrong that DOES NOT affect me and watch that eye turn blind.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|