|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Talk about AIG "bail out"
If I understand things correctly, and I very well may not, is that the Fed "bailed-out" AIG in order to protect customers and stakeholders, both private and corporate, from economic disaster should such a large corporation fail. Read: in order to protect your 401K, IRA, retirement, job, business.
I also wonder why the term bail out is being used; sure the Fed lent some $80 billion at 11% interest to AIG. But is that a real bail out? Sounds like a loan, but I also realize that the Fed did take control of quite a bit of equity. The thinking is that its sufficient capital so that pieces of the business can be sold, restructured, abandoned, etc., so it's kind of understandable to me. Some of the talking heads on TV and radio make it seem like an $80 billion hand out....that the gov't has no business meddling, that one guy shouldn't have control of $800 billion in bail out money (bernake), they should help smaller businesses, etc. Meanwhile lawmakers in Washington are playing the blame game and butt-hurt about not being involved in the decision to fund the loan to AIG. Heh, can you imagine how long that'd take? AIG made mistakes, and rather than allow the economy to suffer more, the Fed stepped in and lent some money and took control of a company that still has some valuable assets that likely outweigh potential liability. Doing so basically eliminates a fire sale on wall street; which is what the Fed is attempting to accomplish. No? I don't doubt that the gov't will make some money off of this deal. Hopefully they'll put it to good use...
__________________
1982 240 D, 308,000 - 321,127 miles (sold) 1982 300 TD,166,500 - 226,000 miles 1998 E 320, 120,000 - 144,000 miles 2005 C 230 K, 26,000 - 77,000 miles (sold) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Its one heck of a nice loan, I wish the Fed made more good moves with our tax money like this. 11.5% return on that large of a loan is fantastic!
I'm under the impression that the stock holders will get hosed, and management as well. Which is how it should be. IMHO the AIG move was a good one, the government saved a bunch of jobs, helped the economy, and is making a bit of money.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Sharing my partner's 2012 Forte 5dr SX til I find my next 123 or 126.. - Do I miss being a service advisor ??? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
1982 240 D, 308,000 - 321,127 miles (sold) 1982 300 TD,166,500 - 226,000 miles 1998 E 320, 120,000 - 144,000 miles 2005 C 230 K, 26,000 - 77,000 miles (sold) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I believe it's being called a bailout because the government is protecting AIG from the risk they took. Or mismanagement, I don't remember if that was them or Lehmans. Either way, the company made money today they couldn't afford tomorrow, but rather than have to afford it, the government afforded it for them.
__________________
1984 300TD |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I'll call it a bail out when it turns into one, for now its a very high interest loan.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Corporate welfare. Rewards inefficiency and poor planning.
B |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I worked in information systems for a large corporation 20 years ago. Even then, we built extensive what-if modelling that projected the risk and likelihood of every kind of business and economic scenario. We ran these programs all the time. I can only believe that the software and data sources are now much more sophisticated.
The executives at these companies were well aware of the risks they were taking, but they chose to ride the wave til it crashed. This is not only true for AIG, but the other giants as well. Maybe they even projected the chances for a government bailout. Since Enron, it seems there's a new generation of corporate executives that operates in callous and brazen disregard of ethical business standards. Everything is expendable, down to their company's 150-year old logo. The only thing that matters is riding the wave of monumental short-term gains. No company is immune from this greed. It makes me have a gut distrust of executive management at all big firms.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles 2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed 2005 Toyota Sienna 2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible 1999 Toyota Tacoma |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Capitalism only works when there is a threat of loss if one assumes too much risk.
The way this game is played, the companies take all the profit, and the taxpayers get all the debt. Bad
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Government need not be meddling. Why AIG and not Lehman? Somebody got AIG ties? What great reward hath no greater risks?
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe the gummint will take over my mortgage. I find it a horrible imposition on my lifestyle.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
How about what is happening to the Money Market Funds? I am sort of glad I didn't invest in one a few months back.
__________________
1999 Toyota Corolla VE (Mine) 2006 Honda Odyssey (Wife's) 1979 300CD (sold) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This is why we have, and need, Social Security.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles 2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed 2005 Toyota Sienna 2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible 1999 Toyota Tacoma |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
This is quite literally the government getting involved in the sub-prime market. They've advanced money on a risky loan in return for a high interest rate.
__________________
Jonathan 2011 Mazda2 2000 E320 4Matic Wagon 1994 C280 (retired) |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Should have helped AIG, should have found a better solution than buy all of Freddie Mac/Fae, probably shouldn't have helped Bear Stearns, was right not to help Lehmann.
__________________
- Brian 1989 500SEL Euro 1966 250SE Cabriolet 1958 BMW Isetta 600 |
Bookmarks |
|
|