Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:41 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Big media jumps to W's defense, again

People have been beating up on Bush for so long, I was almost starting to feel sorry for him. Then I heard his ridiculous interview on ABC in which he attempts to avoid all responsibility for his failures.
Quote:
Big News Orgs Help Bush Whitewash History Of Iraq War
By Greg Sargent - December 2, 2008, 10:02AM

This really isn't complicated. President Bush was not being "blunt" or showing "candor" when he told ABC News in an interview published yesterday that his biggest regret was the failure of intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq War.

Rather, he was whitewashing away his own role in the fisaco by promoting the demonstrable falsehood that there was no available evidence or information that argued against war and that he was merely fooled into invading Iraq solely by the bad intel.

The big news orgs seem eager to help Bush do this. Not a single one of their reports on the interview that we can find bothered to tell readers that there was plenty of good intel -- ignored by the Bush administration -- saying that Saddam wasn't the threat Bush was claiming he was. Nor did any of them bother mentioning that the weapons inspectors in Iraq were saying the same thing -- something that also went ignored.

These facts are absolutely central to understanding Bush's efforts to falsify history in yesterday's interview. Yet they went unmentioned in reports by Reuters, The Washington Post, the Associated Press, CNN, and The New York Times.

Worse, at least one news org pretended that Bush was making some kind of admission or concession here. WaPo hailed Bush's "candor" and said he was being "unusually blunt."

Let's go over this very slowly. For Bush to blame the failure of intel for his decision to invade is not a concession at all, and it is not an admission of failure on his part. Rather, it is the opposite of these things. It is an evasion of responsibility for what happened.

Yet the big news orgs seem unable -- or unwilling -- to grasp this simple dynamic or give readers the info they need to understand it, and for some reason are perfectly willing to enable Bush's falsification of history.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/big_news_orgs_help_bush_whitew.php
History may treat W better then his approval ratings indicate, but lets at least try to keep the history accurate.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:43 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
I thought maybe he would be oblivious to history as well as to the present . . . .
__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2008, 11:57 AM
link's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 835
I think most are just numb when it comes to W. He has driven the thought from the thoughtful, the spirit from the spirited, the breath from the breathing and the vitality from the economy. He is a life sucking, lying, disgusting excuse for a human.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2008, 12:06 PM
Carleton Hughes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,611
Why would anyone be surprised when abrogation of personal responsibility is an institutionalised construct of modren society?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-02-2008, 12:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
The NeoCon rationale for invading Iraq was developed before Bush even took office, independent of intelligence information about Hussein's weapons programs. But Bush is just repeating the old story, which perhaps he might even believe, that the Iraq fiasco was not a failure of a well developed foreign policy strategy but was a result of an intelligence mistake. To admit the truth would put too much of a dent in the overall NeoCon vision of US imperial power undermining any future efforts of rescuscitation.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-02-2008, 12:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,108
Wait, hold on. I thought the media was behind Obama. I specifically saw an MSNBC commercial stating that. It was really sick... But how can that be? It isn't like the media would back opposing sides would they? I mean the policies are so different, like night and day, right? It's not like they miraculously come up with the same things as a continuation of policy as the presidents before them either. Just weird how they all follow the same path completely independent of each other and accidentally pick the same people for their administrations.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-02-2008, 12:34 PM
link's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 835
support?

Joe Klein writes for Time: "At the end of a presidency of stupefying ineptitude, he has become the lamest of all possible ducks." Klein declaims a presidency "that has wobbled between . . . two poles -- overweening arrogance and paralytic incompetence

"The latter has held sway these past few months as the economy has crumbled. It is too early to rate the performance of Bush's economic team, but we have more than enough evidence to say, definitively, that at a moment when there was a vast national need for reassurance, the President himself was a cipher. Yes, he's a lame duck with an Antarctic approval rating -- but can you imagine Bill Clinton going so gently into the night? . . .

"In the end, though, it will not be the creative paralysis that defines Bush. It will be his intellectual laziness, at home and abroad. Bush never understood, or cared about, the delicate balance between freedom and regulation that was necessary to make markets work. He never understood, or cared about, the delicate balance between freedom and equity that was necessary to maintain the strong middle class required for both prosperity and democracy. He never considered the complexities of the cultures he was invading. He never understood that faith, unaccompanied by rigorous skepticism, is a recipe for myopia and foolishness. He is less than President now, and that is appropriate. He was never very much of one."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2008, 12:42 PM
link's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 835


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2008, 04:42 PM
POS's Avatar
POS POS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,506
I don't believe the written word anymore.
__________________
- Brian


1989 500SEL Euro
1966 250SE Cabriolet
1958 BMW Isetta 600
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-02-2008, 05:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by link View Post
I think most are just numb when it comes to W. He has driven the thought from the thoughtful, the spirit from the spirited, the breath from the breathing and the vitality from the economy. He is a life sucking, lying, disgusting excuse for a human.



So are you not thoughtful, spirited, breathing or vital to the economy or have you let a guy you consider a dumbass ruin your life?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-02-2008, 06:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by POS View Post
I don't believe the written word anymore.
Are you saying that you don't believe that W gave that interview to ABC?

If you don't believe the written word, where do you get information about the world?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-02-2008, 06:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin View Post
Are you saying that you don't believe that W gave that interview to ABC?

If you don't believe the written word, where do you get information about the world?
Maybe he means the Bible.

Or throws those IRS notices in the trash before opening them like me
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-02-2008, 06:24 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
But not the wind from the windbags.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page