Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-31-2008, 06:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuan View Post
With vinyl you have the full waveform, with some distortion of course. With a CD you have two points and the best approximation of what's in between the two points. Depending on the sampler chip and the algorithm of the period that could be a straight line or a slightly curved best guess. So if you have vocals or other stuff with lots of high frequency harmonics like trumpets or violins the original waveform is significantly altered with digital.

In the 80's and early 90's most multitrack recordings were still done via analog. They were mastered to digital later. That means they were record with all the distortion of analog and later that distortion was once again approximated during the mastering process. Of course that could be minimized with good equipment like good mixing boards and good reel to reel multitrack recorders, but still, one channel biased a little hot or a drunk studio intern could severely impact the recording.

Anyway in general, CD's are better for techno like stuff with heavy bass. Vinyl is better on vocals and acoustic instruments.
I don't know what the sampling rates are but if high enough it really shouldn't matter

__________________
MBlovr
'59 180 Dad's original
'59 180 Dad's 2nd one
'67 250SE Dad's last one
'59 220 SE My first one
'62 220SE Coupe second one
'89 190E 2.6 5spd third one
'06 E350 4matic (sold)
'10 E350 4matic
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-31-2008, 06:52 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
The debates over "high fidelity" have been a staple since the "Mary Had a Little Lamb" recordings by Edison . . . frankly, if you're worried about sonic interpretation on most modern music, you're just not drinkin' enough . . .

$9.500 will get this little jewel:



62 lb with magnetic bearing (yes, it levitates) to isolate the 8mm thick platter from vibrations.
droooooool
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-31-2008, 06:55 PM
Medmech's Avatar
Gone Waterboarding
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 117
So Kuan do you think Kuan Jr. was imitating daddy's needle cleaning ritual except instead of using the extra fine oogkajooba hair stylus brush he used his Bob the builder hammer?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-31-2008, 06:57 PM
Kuan's Avatar
unband
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At the Birkebeiner
Posts: 3,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howitzer View Post
So Kuan do you think Kuan Jr. was imitating daddy's needle cleaning ritual except instead of using the extra fine oogkajooba hair stylus brush he used his Bob the builder hammer?
When all you have is a Bob the Builder hammer, everything looks like a nail.
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-31-2008, 07:17 PM
BENZ-LGB's Avatar
Strong, silent type
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuan View Post
Wife and kid are gone. I pick out two albums to go with my steak and wine and find out...

THE KID BUSTED MY SUMIKO BLUE POINT SPECIAL NEEDLE!
Always remember that your kid will get to pick your retirement home. Be nice to him...
__________________
Current Benzes

1989 300TE "Alice"
1990 300CE "Sam Spade"
1991 300CE "Beowulf" RIP (06.1991 - 10.10.2007)
1998 E320 "Orson"
2002 C320 Wagon "Molly Fox"

Res non semper sunt quae esse videntur

My Gallery

Not in this weather!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-31-2008, 08:42 PM
Kuan's Avatar
unband
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: At the Birkebeiner
Posts: 3,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by BENZ-LGB View Post
Always remember that your kid will get to pick your retirement home. Be nice to him...
He's not 18 yet. The way things are going I'll need to be in one before he's of legal age.
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-31-2008, 09:18 PM
LaRondo's Avatar
Rondissimo
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Coast
Posts: 162
That's a real bummer, I can imagine your pain. What an inopportune moment, not that I wanted to suggest that there is ever a good time for such an unholy finding, when trying to play a record.

This is how playing vinyl records came to sudden end for me, when somehow the diamond tip on the (back then) $800 Yamaha whatever it was, vanished.

That SME 3012 I had on the Micro Seiki RX1500 was just too light, you could blow it across the groove from more than 2 yards distance.

Based on the circumtance, I decided to throw my money at CD's and qualified players.

It is what it is. You can start with a good CD player and connect it to your system, or even try a DVD player, which could give you a higher bitrate when reading discs.

I second Marty's advice as an immediate pain killer.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-31-2008, 09:26 PM
Chris Bell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
This does not follow. These digital samples are not created by playing an actual instrument across its entire range and recording it. They are created by playing just a few notes, noting the composition of the signal (whether through Fourier analysis or Wavelet analysis or something else) and then extrapolating to get the entire range. And this doesn't even get into the fact that the same frequency can be generated MANY ways on an actual instrument.

There is nothing in this example which applies to the vinyl/CD accuracy debate.



10Khz? Where does this come from? And interpolation doesn't matter if the effects are beyond the range of your hearing. 22Khz is apparently well beyond mine.
So...Where do MP3 players fit in here. Don't they basically sample a sample?
__________________
I'm sick of .sig files
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-31-2008, 09:53 PM
LUVMBDiesels's Avatar
Dead on balls accurate...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Red Lion,Pa
Posts: 2,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Bell View Post
So...Where do MP3 players fit in here. Don't they basically sample a sample?
When analog information is converted to digital it loses information.
MP3 players compress the digital file losing even more information.

The best way to listen to music is on a turntable (all the analog informaiton is there) on a nice tube driven amplifier as transistors also effect the music.

I had a beautiful set of Marantz turntable preamp and amplifier all vintage stuff from the 1960's

I made a BIG HUGE CRAZY mistake in 1986 when I bought a high end (at the time) CD player. I GAVE ALL MY RECORDS AND THE HI FI AWAY!

After years of kicking myself in the @ss I found ebay.
Now I have the same turntable but a fairly decent Kenwood amp from the late 1970's

I also have the old CD player, which still works, attached to a high watt Yamaha integrated amp.
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy"

Current
Monika '74 450 SL
BrownHilda '79 280SL
FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban
Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee
Krystal 2004 Volvo S60
Gone
'74 Jeep CJ5
'97 Jeep ZJ Laredo
Rudolf ‘86 300SDL
Bruno '81 300SD
Fritzi '84 BMW
'92 Subaru
'96 Impala SS
'71 Buick GS conv
'67 GTO conv
'63 Corvair conv
'57 Nomad
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-31-2008, 10:05 PM
LaRondo's Avatar
Rondissimo
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Coast
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUVMBDiesels View Post
When analog information is converted to digital it loses information.
MP3 players compress the digital file losing even more information.

The best way to listen to music is on a turntable (all the analog informaiton is there) on a nice tube driven amplifier as transistors also effect the music.

I had a beautiful set of Marantz turntable preamp and amplifier all vintage stuff from the 1960's

I made a BIG HUGE CRAZY mistake in 1986 when I bought a high end (at the time) CD player. I GAVE ALL MY RECORDS AND THE HI FI AWAY!

After years of kicking myself in the @ss I found ebay.
Now I have the same turntable but a fairly decent Kenwood amp from the late 1970's

I also have the old CD player, which still works, attached to a high watt Yamaha integrated amp.
Marantz makes some good CD players as well. One can get into it for $500 or less.

I made a similar mistake with I call the 1st generation of my LP's. I sold them on a single day at a swap meet for about an apple and an egg.

Many of the records are not available anymore, on neither media.

Funny though, how I was able to recover many of the vinyl records, when the stores where selling them cheap, because the Compact Disc was moving in.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 12-31-2008, 11:50 PM
Chris Bell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 901
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUVMBDiesels View Post
When analog information is converted to digital it loses information.
MP3 players compress the digital file losing even more information.

The best way to listen to music is on a turntable (all the analog informaiton is there) on a nice tube driven amplifier as transistors also effect the music.

I had a beautiful set of Marantz turntable preamp and amplifier all vintage stuff from the 1960's

I made a BIG HUGE CRAZY mistake in 1986 when I bought a high end (at the time) CD player. I GAVE ALL MY RECORDS AND THE HI FI AWAY!

After years of kicking myself in the @ss I found ebay.
Now I have the same turntable but a fairly decent Kenwood amp from the late 1970's

I also have the old CD player, which still works, attached to a high watt Yamaha integrated amp.
Funny you should mention that...I've been hunting Ebay and craigslist for a good Marantz 2285B or seperates. I love that late 70's Marantz equipment, they sound great and look better. I would like to buy a good Marantz tube amp. But there's just not that many of them around and the one's I have seen are all way out of my price range.
__________________
I'm sick of .sig files
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:22 AM
johnathan1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Downey, SoCal
Posts: 1,190
True audiophiles know that vinyl is the best recording medium.
__________________
Current cars:
2000 ML55 AMG, 174k miles
2003 C240 T-Modell, 202k miles
1995 S320, 207k Miles
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-01-2009, 01:04 AM
LaRondo's Avatar
Rondissimo
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Coast
Posts: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnathan1 View Post
True audiophiles know that vinyl is the best recording medium.
I wouldn't say it is the best. Depending on the level of quality, it has properties preferred by some, while other prefer the properties of high quality DDD recordings.

Usually, before vinyl gets pressed, the recording is captured on tape.
Here it depends how good the musicians are, to get it right the first time, as with everytime the tape runs over the heads, abraision will reduce the quality.

Ofcourse, you can do direct cut recording, but that certainly is extremely tidious and way too costly for commercial purposes.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-01-2009, 11:32 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUVMBDiesels View Post
When analog information is converted to digital it loses information.
This falls under the mathematical information theory, which is a fairly well-understood area. There is an easily-stated relationship between bit-rate and signal-to-noise ratio. This was established in the late 40's by Shannon and Weaver in their famous book, "The Mathematical Theory of Communication."
Quote:
MP3 players compress the digital file losing even more information.
Most of the time. There are lossless compression methods that some "MP3" players can handle. These work by removing redundancy. I don't know the algorithm used, but if it isn't LZ, it's something similar.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-01-2009, 09:43 PM
Monomer's Avatar
Colonel Blitz
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kuan View Post
It's not very practical. You can recognize the "digital" canons on Telarc's 1812 release by the pit in the record. If you didn't know better you'd think it was damaged.
my 400 deep collection sounds just fine.



Usually only truly good releases will make it to vinyl; as pressing is $$ compared to a digital release.

.wav is the only way to go for digital recording. .mp3 is only popular because of little space the compressed file takes up. With high capacity solid state drives and more power than ever before make .mp3 obsolete.



I do plan on using a DVS system in the future, but only for house parties. Carrying a crate of a couple hundred records gets to be back breaking.

__________________
-1983 VW Rabbit LS Diesel (5speed, VNT/Giles build)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page