Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Why does this post make me think of that song "We may never love like this again."?
|
Quote:
I think it is contrived and exaggerated. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I suppose it depends on what they are saying doesn't it? Communism was a great idea too. You just have to ignore some "pesky" issues. Same here. Will govt intervention fix the problem that we are having? Absolutely. Have we forgotten something? Could be. A mother could fix the problem of her infant going hungry by sticking her boobs in his mouth. This relationship can go on for a long time. OTOH, will the kid be self sufficient or will he constantly be at the boob when he is hungry? Same thing. What message is the govt trying to send? That every time life hands you lemons you go suck on Mommy's boobs instead of making lemonade? Do you think we are as self sufficient as we were 100 years ago? I think not. Is that a good thing? I think not. Also, lets not forget that the "fix" govt promises is only a theory based on if all the good stuff happens. Have they figured in what if things go on as usual or is the economist theory that govt intervention is best based on the notion that if the govt does all it is supposed to do and none of the bad things, such and so forth will happen? |
Quote:
Why? He uses proportionately more resources than you do or simply because he can afford it? |
Quote:
I know I use a lot of examples of democrat craziness. That is MY experience; I live in MD--a state to the left of Kennedy's MA. Democrats have total control at the State level. Many of the Counties are repub-run, but on a state-wide level, Balt, and the DC suburbs carry more weight then the rest of the land mass of the state. If I lived in a state where repubs had been running things for 40 or 50 years, I would probably have examples of repub craziness. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Both. Capitalism tends to redistribute wealth from the not-so-rich to the rich so taxation aims to reverse the process to some extent and fund national needs in the process. I have proposed doing away with the income tax and simply have a high federal sales tax but that would have its own downfalls. The redistribution effect would be somewhat smaller and the sales tax would have to be really high to maintain the same tax revenue. But most importantly it wouldn't work in our consumer-driven economy. We'd need to transition away from that to something else to maintain the same living standard. |
Quote:
How did they calculate "in the long run"? If their calculation is based off whether the business will be afloat in 5 years or not, I suspect you are right. Didn't you once make a case for alternative energy where you said the tax breaks prevented the alternative energy companies (new kids on the block) from displacing the dinosaurs (current inefficient systems)? If the companies they are bailing out cannot survive bad times on their own, why should we keep them around? So we can bail them out again when bad times come along? Or should we let them die out and someone fresh start up something else? If it was one or two major companies or simply one sector, sure. If it is all over the board, maybe it is time to start again. If my car has a bad trans, I'll fix it. If the trans, engine, rear end, AC system, lights, etc, etc are all bad, I don't see how I can support fixing it all up. |
Quote:
How high is "really high"? With all the ways they nickle and dime us with this tax, that tax and what not, we don't really know what we are paying in taxes. This way, if they need more money, they can't simply increase a tax here and there. They'd have to piss off people by showing them on their payslip exactly what they are taking out. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website