PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/)
-   -   Rahm Emanuel's Profitable Raping ofFreddie Mac (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/248757-rahm-emanuels-profitable-raping-offreddie-mac.html)

guage 03-28-2009 04:21 PM

Rahm Emanuel's Profitable Raping ofFreddie Mac
 
The fox sleeps with the chickens
Is congress going to demand he return his pay?

Quote:

One of those allegedly asleep-at-the-switch board members was Chicago's Rahm Emanuel—now chief of staff to President Barack Obama—who made at least $320,000 for a 14-month stint at Freddie Mac that required little effort.



Before its portfolio of bad loans helped trigger the current housing crisis, mortgage giant Freddie Mac was the focus of a major accounting scandal that led to a management shake-up, huge fines and scalding condemnation of passive directors by a top federal regulator.

One of those allegedly asleep-at-the-switch board members was Chicago's Rahm Emanuel—now chief of staff to President Barack Obama—who made at least $320,000 for a 14-month stint at Freddie Mac that required little effort.

As gatekeeper to Obama, Emanuel now plays a critical role in addressing the nation's mortgage woes and fulfilling the administration's pledge to impose responsibility on the financial world.

Emanuel's Freddie Mac involvement has been a prominent point on his political résumé, and his healthy payday from the firm has been no secret either. What is less known, however, is how little he apparently did for his money and how he benefited from the kind of cozy ties between Washington and Wall Street that have fueled the nation's current economic mess.

Though just 49, Emanuel is a veteran Democratic strategist and fundraiser who served three terms in the U.S. House after helping elect Mayor Richard Daley and former President Bill Clinton. The Freddie Mac money was a small piece of the $16 million he made in a three-year interlude as an investment banker a decade ago.

In business as in politics, Emanuel has cultivated an aggressive, take-charge reputation that made him rich and propelled his rise to the front of the national stage. But buried deep in corporate and government documents on the Freddie Mac scandal is a little-known and very different story involving Emanuel.

He was named to the Freddie Mac board in February 2000 by Clinton, whom Emanuel had served as White House political director and vocal defender during the Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky scandals.

The board met no more than six times a year. Unlike most fellow directors, Emanuel was not assigned to any of the board's working committees, according to company proxy statements. Immediately upon joining the board, Emanuel and other new directors qualified for $380,000 in stock and options plus a $20,000 annual fee, records indicate.

On Emanuel's watch, the board was told by executives of a plan to use accounting tricks to mislead shareholders about outsize profits the government-chartered firm was then reaping from risky investments. The goal was to push earnings onto the books in future years, ensuring that Freddie Mac would appear profitable on paper for years to come and helping maximize annual bonuses for company brass.

The accounting scandal wasn't the only one that brewed during Emanuel's tenure.

During his brief time on the board, the company hatched a plan to enhance its political muscle. That scheme, also reviewed by the board, led to a record $3.8 million fine from the Federal Election Commission for illegally using corporate resources to host fundraisers for politicians. Emanuel was the beneficiary of one of those parties after he left the board and ran in 2002 for a seat in Congress from the North Side of Chicago.

The board was throttled for its acquiescence to the accounting manipulation in a 2003 report by Armando Falcon Jr., head of a federal oversight agency for Freddie Mac. The scandal forced Freddie Mac to restate $5 billion in earnings and pay $585 million in fines and legal settlements. It also foreshadowed even harder times at the firm.

Many of those same risky investment practices tied to the accounting scandal eventually brought the firm to the brink of insolvency and led to its seizure last year by the Bush administration, which pledged to inject up to $100 billion in new capital to keep the firm afloat. The Obama administration has doubled that commitment.

Freddie Mac reported recently that it lost $50 billion in 2008. It so far has tapped $14 billion of the government's guarantee and said it soon will need an additional $30 billion to keep operating.

Like its larger government-chartered cousin Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac was created by Congress to promote home ownership, though both are private corporations with shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The two firms hold stakes in half the nation's residential mortgages.

Because of Freddie Mac's federal charter, the board in Emanuel's day was a hybrid of directors elected by shareholders and those appointed by the president.

In his final year in office, Clinton tapped three close pals: Emanuel, Washington lobbyist and golfing partner James Free, and Harold Ickes, a former White House aide instrumental in securing the election of Hillary Clinton to the U.S. Senate. Free's appointment was good for four months, and Ickes' only three months.

Falcon, director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, found that presidential appointees played no "meaningful role" in overseeing the company and recommended that their positions be eliminated.

John Coffee, a law professor and expert on corporate governance at Columbia University, said the financial crisis at Freddie Mac was years in the making and fueled by chronically weak oversight by the firm's directors. The presence of presidential appointees on the board didn't help, he added.

"You know there was a patronage system and these people were only going to serve a short time," Coffee said. "That's why [they] get the stock upfront."

MS Fowler 03-28-2009 05:00 PM

Public outrage depends on the party affiliation of the alleged offender.

cmac2012 03-28-2009 05:20 PM

Does sound a bit shaky to me. Not sure I would call it "raping."

It 's unfortunate that we seem to almost expect a certain amount of graft among elected officials.

mwood 03-28-2009 05:55 PM

No one will call him on it; they're all afraid he'll kill them!

Palangi 03-28-2009 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwood (Post 2153118)
No one will call him on it; they're all afraid he'll kill them!

Or send them a dead fish..... :eek:

mwood 03-28-2009 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MS Fowler (Post 2153070)
Public outrage depends on the party affiliation of the alleged offender.

You are apparently right, the left is very quiet on this.

Chris Bell 03-28-2009 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwood (Post 2153258)
You are apparently right, the left is very quiet on this.

Their still obsessing about swift boats or something.

Botnst 03-28-2009 10:40 PM

I cannot believe that a politician could be corrupt. Astonishing.

JollyRoger 03-29-2009 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwood (Post 2153258)
You are apparently right, the left is very quiet on this.

I think it would be better characterized as not "quiet" but more like "WGAS".

Botnst 03-29-2009 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JollyRoger (Post 2154172)
I think it would be better characterized as not "quiet" but more like "WGAS".

Exactly right.

JollyRoger 03-29-2009 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 2153268)
I cannot believe that a politician could be corrupt. Astonishing.

What corruption are you accusing him of?

cmbdiesel 03-30-2009 09:34 AM

It is all to common, for board members and officers of a company, to receive enormous compensation packages for doing nothing. Would that we complained about it before someone took public office. Sure, I don't like how he got that money either, but if you go after him for it, start going after the thousands of others too. Then we can even out everyone's pay, comrade.

JollyRoger 03-30-2009 10:12 AM

They pay for your connections, and Rahm is a connected guy. This looks like old fashion capitalism to me, as we can all note by Botnst's inability to answer my request for a specific example of his corruption.

JollyRoger 03-30-2009 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MS Fowler (Post 2153070)
Public outrage depends on the party affiliation of the alleged offender.

Perhaps that is because one party is looking out for your a$$, while the other is taking great care to be amorous with the buttcheeks of corporate power, thouroughly smooching when necessary.

Botnst 03-30-2009 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JollyRoger (Post 2154560)
They pay for your connections, and Rahm is a connected guy. This looks like old fashion capitalism to me, as we can all note by Botnst's inability to answer my request for a specific example of his corruption.

You got me there: He's every bit as provably corrupt as Karl Rove.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website