![]() |
Microsoft Office 2003 vs. 2007
I have an opportunity to buy a copy of one of these through school. I can get 2003 Professional or 2007 Enterprise. Does anyone know what the difference is?
|
A new layout....Unless you absolutely 100% need it....not worth it at all.
|
We run '03 at the office, and 'upgraded' to '07. Within a few weeks, everyone went back to '03, as we found the newer version was not kind to some of the older computers re they ran way slower. Painfully slower.
|
07 sucks.
Try OpenOffice.org - it's free and works pretty darn well. I quit using word entirely. It also handles .docx which was my initial reason for downloading it. |
Most of my work involves programming SQL server applications, we use all the versions of Access as frontends to big SQL server databases depending on what the client is using in his environment, it saves all kinds of licensing costs and adds an additional layer of security as well. Access 2003 has become somewhat of a corporate standard with all large companies, it is very stable and fairly easy to learn. 2007 is pretty much the exact opposite. There is really only one reason to migrate to it in the business world, 2007 offers a lot of hooks into Microsoft's Sharepoint product, which is being used a lot of places but as an app hasn't exactly set the world on fire. If you are in an environment where integration with Sharepoint isn't a consideration, I'd go with 2003, you can always upgrade later. Microsoft wants you to use 2007 because once you are using it, if you want to do any serious development in it you will be sending Microsoft more money to put a .Net development platform together, while 2003 uses the older VBA/VB 6 COM environment, all of which is built into Access and for which there is twenty years worth of free and/or cheap addins available along with all kinds of libraries that allow 2003 to be integrated into web apps and just about anything else you can think of. With 2007, all of what is functionally pretty much the same stuff is for sale for high prices.
|
Quote:
|
Microsoft Office 2003 vs. 2007...
About four years (bwahahahahahah)...
...like everyone already said, stay away from '07 unless you are a "hair-on-fire" accountant! Between MS Office '07, Windows 7/Vista (yada yada), seems like Microsoft is unconsciously forcing users to take a really hard look at Apple's offerings...I mean any PC box over three years old isn't going to run their newer stuff very well. So if you have to shop for a bigger mousetrap, might as well consider defecting to Apple...I know I am!! |
Quote:
who the hell uses calibri size 11 for term papers!!!! Standard MLA and APA formatting is Times New Roman size 12... every damn paper I have to go in and change it...its rather annoying(I havent gotten around to figuring out how to make the change stick) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
OK. Thanks. I guess that explains why they want twice as much money for the 2003. I have OpenOffice but it has some issues. However I have not updated it since 2007. I figured since I can get this at a student price I would give it a go. So I will go with the 2003. Thanks.
|
I use MS Office 2007 at work and I hate it. I do a lot of Word, Excel and Access stuff and the new interfaces are crap. As for Access I have ditched it in favor of SQL Server Express and either just use the SQL Manager or I build a web front end in Visual Studio.
At home I use OpenOffice 3. It is free and powerful, and yes it will save files as MS compatible .doc, and .xls files. I have used OpenOffice since it was StarOffice back in the 1990's I always liked it better, especially since it was Java based and could run on Windows, Unix, or Mac hardware |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website