Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2009, 09:42 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Another Airbus tries to water ski....

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31638822/ns/world_news-africa

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:41 AM
LUVMBDiesels's Avatar
Dead on balls accurate...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Red Lion,Pa
Posts: 2,207
Put MY butt in a 747!
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy"

Current
Monika '74 450 SL
BrownHilda '79 280SL
FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban
Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee
Krystal 2004 Volvo S60
Gone
'74 Jeep CJ5
'97 Jeep ZJ Laredo
Rudolf ‘86 300SDL
Bruno '81 300SD
Fritzi '84 BMW
'92 Subaru
'96 Impala SS
'71 Buick GS conv
'67 GTO conv
'63 Corvair conv
'57 Nomad
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:50 AM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
? Airbus are plenty reliable....tons of Boeings have crashed too.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-30-2009, 02:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
? Airbus are plenty reliable....tons of Boeings have crashed too.
Yeah. But Boeings don't typically tend to break apart in flight, which seems like it could possibly be a burgeoning problem with Airbusses. Although this particular incident looks like it could simply be bad weather and not necessarily the planes fault.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj67coll View Post
Yeah. But Boeings don't typically tend to break apart in flight, which seems like it could possibly be a burgeoning problem with Airbusses. Although this particular incident looks like it could simply be bad weather and not necessarily the planes fault.

- Peter.
I sure hope its not a growing problem. Everyone is flying those things now.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:09 PM
G-Benz's Avatar
Razorback Soccer Dad
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas/Fort-Worth
Posts: 5,711
The pilots of both Airbus jetliners attempted to negotiate flying in bad weather...

...perhaps that is more of an issue than the structural integrity of those planes?
__________________
2009 ML350 (106K) - Family vehicle
2001 CLK430 Cabriolet (80K) - Wife's car
2005 BMW 645CI (138K) - My daily driver
2016 Mustang (32K) - Daughter's car
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Benz View Post
The pilots of both Airbus jetliners attempted to negotiate flying in bad weather...

...perhaps that is more of an issue than the structural integrity of those planes?
If you're attempting to land on an island in bad weather, you may not be able to avoid it. Not like you can just divert across the ocean. However if your plane has a design flaw, like a weakness in the tail the means the tail will break under severe weather conditions, that is a problem. There are now three cases of Airbus tales coming off their plans. The American airlines crash in NY some years back. The Air France crash where the tail has been found floating a long way from the rest of the wreckage and the Air Carribes' which lost it's rudder, though thankfully not the whole tail and managed to get on the ground without loss of life.

And of course we don't yet know exactly what caused this Yemenia plane to go down.

Boeing has it's fair share of problems but nothing like such a spate of tail incidents that points to a possible serious structual problem with the basic design.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:43 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
I still rather fly on a nice American made Boeing, and not some EU Airbus.

Lately thats looking to be a good plan.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:51 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
it does give one pause concerning possible design issues with the Airbus. also, didn't Airbus offer some of the U.S. airlines a better "deal" than Boeing on some aircraft purchases? sometimes you DO get what you pay for....buy extra life insurance before boarding one of these babies......
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-30-2009, 04:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
51,900 hours on the one that went down. I wonder if that had something to do with it.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-30-2009, 04:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Some of you guys are jumping to uninformed conclusions. The investigation thus far into the Air France crash points to a faulty speed meter. Any airplane will break apart if flown too fast, doesn't matter where it's made. And about this latest crash we don't really know what happened yet. From my news readings I remember more Boeing 737 crashes than anything else.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-30-2009, 07:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: los angeles
Posts: 451
uh, i think that airbus is using a lot of synthetic materials that aren't holding up. they're trying to save on weight, but..

(and no, i'm no "true believer" in boeing either, tho i believe their big problem was planes staying in service longer than they were designed for.)
__________________
"The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-30-2009, 07:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselAddict View Post
Some of you guys are jumping to uninformed conclusions. The investigation thus far into the Air France crash points to a faulty speed meter. Any airplane will break apart if flown too fast, doesn't matter where it's made. And about this latest crash we don't really know what happened yet. From my news readings I remember more Boeing 737 crashes than anything else.
I've been looking at an aviation forum where the AF crash has been discussed a lot recently. Frankly the evidence is far to incomplete to indicate what really happened. However there have been a lot of problems associated with faulty speed sensors on Airbus planes recently, far more than on Boeing although there was one incident on a Boeing recently.

I had no idea just how little margin for error there is at high altitudes. FL350 etc. The coffin corner it's called. If the plane goes to fast or to slow at that height it becomes aerodynamically unstable and extreme buffetting occurs, similar to severe turbulence. I'm paraphrasing here but I'm no expert.

If a plane is too weak such buffetting can cause it to break apart. As I've pointed out three Airbuses lost their tails, or portions of their tails and there is concern that composite technology is not yet mature enough to handle the stresses concerned. Or that Airbus is not implementing it properly.

As I've said, while I'm aware Boeing has it's share of problems structural integrity does not appear to be one of them.

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-30-2009, 08:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj67coll View Post
I've been looking at an aviation forum where the AF crash has been discussed a lot recently. Frankly the evidence is far to incomplete to indicate what really happened. However there have been a lot of problems associated with faulty speed sensors on Airbus planes recently, far more than on Boeing although there was one incident on a Boeing recently.

I had no idea just how little margin for error there is at high altitudes. FL350 etc. The coffin corner it's called. If the plane goes to fast or to slow at that height it becomes aerodynamically unstable and extreme buffetting occurs, similar to severe turbulence. I'm paraphrasing here but I'm no expert.

If a plane is too weak such buffetting can cause it to break apart. As I've pointed out three Airbuses lost their tails, or portions of their tails and there is concern that composite technology is not yet mature enough to handle the stresses concerned. Or that Airbus is not implementing it properly.

As I've said, while I'm aware Boeing has it's share of problems structural integrity does not appear to be one of them.

- Peter.
What about that Qantas plane that recently blew a hole in its luggage compartment, wasn't that a 747? Also I remember some incident near Hawaii or involving Hawaiian Airlines where the plane blew a hole in the passenger cabin and a flight attendant got sucked out. It was probably a Boeing too.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-30-2009, 09:04 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Bottom Line: When it's your time, it's your time.

also, what goes up must come down.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page