|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cost of A LLC in California
My two siblings and I are joint out of state owners of a piece of commercial property in Southern California. We have retained an attorney there to negotiate a lease on the property. He has told us that we should get a LLC. He gave us an estimated cost which amounts' to 3-4 hours of his time ($335/hr) plus. I asked a good friend of mine who holds a significant amount of rental properties here in Ohio who also owns real estate in Florida and he said his cost was $200-300 dollars. I asked my BIL who aslo owns a lot of real estate in Pennsylvania and he disagrees with my friends cost and sides with the lawyers estimate.
I'm clueless and just don't want to get ripped off. Anybody done these in California and can give me some guidance on whats reasonable? Thanks in advance
__________________
MBlovr '59 180 Dad's original '59 180 Dad's 2nd one '67 250SE Dad's last one '59 220 SE My first one '62 220SE Coupe second one '89 190E 2.6 5spd third one '06 E350 4matic (sold) '10 E350 4matic Last edited by MBlovr; 09-20-2009 at 11:53 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
You can do it on legalzoom.com, for $150(and up). I think the fees are $600 or $800 a year. LLC's are one and Chapter X corps are the other. That's a tax to the state, not the site.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I guess I'm not clear as to how many attorney hours are required if I didn't do it online
Thanks
__________________
MBlovr '59 180 Dad's original '59 180 Dad's 2nd one '67 250SE Dad's last one '59 220 SE My first one '62 220SE Coupe second one '89 190E 2.6 5spd third one '06 E350 4matic (sold) '10 E350 4matic |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
It costs a RE investor I know $1,500 a year per LLC here in CT, thats with a lawyer setting it up. Said investor has 6 plus an S or C corp.
I don't beleive in DIY in this area. Lots of areas where you can mess up and get yourself screw. Pay the lawyer.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The last thing you want is the cheapest lawyer you can find.
__________________
2002 E320 4-Matic 2008 Subaru Outback 2009 Subaru Forester |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
To form the LLC with the Secretary of State probadbly isn't too big of a deal. Here in NJ, you can do it online in 10 minutes. The application consists of 5 questions and payment of a fee of $200.00 iirc. BUT
Then you have to worry about the Operating Agreement. You can probably get a boilerplate version somewhere on line for cheap, but to try and cover all the bases of partner rights, duties, obligations, etc, etc. is daunting for most laymen. I strongly advise you to create an Operating Agreement and have all the sibs sign it. Of particular concern are partner withdrawal provisions and whether the LLC will have any first rights in case any member wants to sell. Family members or not, your REALLY WANT to do this. And have expert advice in so doing. I'd say $1200-1500 isn't too big a deal. Some tax attorneys here in my small town charge 400./hr. $335 per hr. isn't too bad. FWIW, Calif. charges an annual tax of $800.00 on LLC's. They also charge, if applicable, an annual fee depending on income. Link: http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/misc/3556.pdf And if you elect to be taxed as a partnership, the foreign partners are liable to pay Ca. income tax too. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
MBlovr '59 180 Dad's original '59 180 Dad's 2nd one '67 250SE Dad's last one '59 220 SE My first one '62 220SE Coupe second one '89 190E 2.6 5spd third one '06 E350 4matic (sold) '10 E350 4matic |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
View it here. http://www.sos.ca.gov/business/llc/forms/llc-1.pdf By "foreign" I was indeed referring to any CA non-resident. I do not know whether the "co-tenancy" agreement refers to an agreement between LLC members or between the landlord (LLC) and tenants under CA law. MY gut tells me it deals with tenant/landlord matters and not matters involving partner actions between themselves or between partners and the LLC. ( I am using the term partner interchangeably with member, which is the formal name for an individual or business investor/owner in an LLC.) Hope this helps. edit: The more I thought about this, the more I think cotenancy agreement may relate to the way the property is titled to the several owners (as in "tenants by the entirety", "tenants in common", etc.) I think CA is a community property state and that term -- "cotenancy" -- may be common in CA legal circles or other community property states. If this assumption is correct, a "cotenancy agreement" (whatever that is) would likely deal with legal ownership of the property. An LLC Operating Agreement would deal with the business rights, duties and obligations of the members (partmers). There may be some overlapping, but they two terms may not refer to the same legal document. I'm not an attorney, so don't take anything I say as legal advice. That's what California lawyers are for. Last edited by dynalow; 09-23-2009 at 10:00 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Member?
Right on with the Operating Agreement. LLC is pretty much useless without it if it gets sued. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That being the case, it's just old habits dying hard (from a couple of pre-LLC decades in the saddle) in referring to members as partners, since the tax return (Form 1065) filed by LLC's predominately uses the term "Partner". |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
MBlovr '59 180 Dad's original '59 180 Dad's 2nd one '67 250SE Dad's last one '59 220 SE My first one '62 220SE Coupe second one '89 190E 2.6 5spd third one '06 E350 4matic (sold) '10 E350 4matic Last edited by MBlovr; 09-23-2009 at 11:05 PM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|