Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2009, 11:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 301
Cost of A LLC in California

My two siblings and I are joint out of state owners of a piece of commercial property in Southern California. We have retained an attorney there to negotiate a lease on the property. He has told us that we should get a LLC. He gave us an estimated cost which amounts' to 3-4 hours of his time ($335/hr) plus. I asked a good friend of mine who holds a significant amount of rental properties here in Ohio who also owns real estate in Florida and he said his cost was $200-300 dollars. I asked my BIL who aslo owns a lot of real estate in Pennsylvania and he disagrees with my friends cost and sides with the lawyers estimate.

I'm clueless and just don't want to get ripped off.

Anybody done these in California and can give me some guidance on whats reasonable?

Thanks in advance

__________________
MBlovr
'59 180 Dad's original
'59 180 Dad's 2nd one
'67 250SE Dad's last one
'59 220 SE My first one
'62 220SE Coupe second one
'89 190E 2.6 5spd third one
'06 E350 4matic (sold)
'10 E350 4matic

Last edited by MBlovr; 09-20-2009 at 11:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2009, 01:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,108
You can do it on legalzoom.com, for $150(and up). I think the fees are $600 or $800 a year. LLC's are one and Chapter X corps are the other. That's a tax to the state, not the site.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2009, 07:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 301
I guess I'm not clear as to how many attorney hours are required if I didn't do it online
Thanks
__________________
MBlovr
'59 180 Dad's original
'59 180 Dad's 2nd one
'67 250SE Dad's last one
'59 220 SE My first one
'62 220SE Coupe second one
'89 190E 2.6 5spd third one
'06 E350 4matic (sold)
'10 E350 4matic
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2009, 10:55 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
It costs a RE investor I know $1,500 a year per LLC here in CT, thats with a lawyer setting it up. Said investor has 6 plus an S or C corp.

I don't beleive in DIY in this area. Lots of areas where you can mess up and get yourself screw. Pay the lawyer.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-22-2009, 12:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 185
The last thing you want is the cheapest lawyer you can find.
__________________
2002 E320 4-Matic
2008 Subaru Outback
2009 Subaru Forester
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-22-2009, 01:18 PM
dynalow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,599
To form the LLC with the Secretary of State probadbly isn't too big of a deal. Here in NJ, you can do it online in 10 minutes. The application consists of 5 questions and payment of a fee of $200.00 iirc. BUT

Then you have to worry about the Operating Agreement. You can probably get a boilerplate version somewhere on line for cheap, but to try and cover all the bases of partner rights, duties, obligations, etc, etc. is daunting for most laymen.

I strongly advise you to create an Operating Agreement and have all the sibs sign it. Of particular concern are partner withdrawal provisions and whether the LLC will have any first rights in case any member wants to sell. Family members or not, your REALLY WANT to do this. And have expert advice in so doing. I'd say $1200-1500 isn't too big a deal. Some tax attorneys here in my small town charge 400./hr. $335 per hr. isn't too bad.


FWIW, Calif. charges an annual tax of $800.00 on LLC's. They also charge, if applicable, an annual fee depending on income. Link:
http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/misc/3556.pdf
And if you elect to be taxed as a partnership, the foreign partners are liable to pay Ca. income tax too.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-22-2009, 08:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynalow View Post
To form the LLC with the Secretary of State probadbly isn't too big of a deal. Here in NJ, you can do it online in 10 minutes. The application consists of 5 questions and payment of a fee of $200.00 iirc. BUT

Then you have to worry about the Operating Agreement. You can probably get a boilerplate version somewhere on line for cheap, but to try and cover all the bases of partner rights, duties, obligations, etc, etc. is daunting for most laymen.

I strongly advise you to create an Operating Agreement and have all the sibs sign it. Of particular concern are partner withdrawal provisions and whether the LLC will have any first rights in case any member wants to sell. Family members or not, your REALLY WANT to do this. And have expert advice in so doing. I'd say $1200-1500 isn't too big a deal. Some tax attorneys here in my small town charge 400./hr. $335 per hr. isn't too bad.


FWIW, Calif. charges an annual tax of $800.00 on LLC's. They also charge, if applicable, an annual fee depending on income. Link:
http://www.ftb.ca.gov/forms/misc/3556.pdf
And if you elect to be taxed as a partnership, the foreign partners are liable to pay Ca. income tax too.
First of all thank you kindly for your helpful response. In addition to the LLC the attorney wanted us to have a cotenancy agreement for I thought the reasons that you gave above ie if one of us wants to sell(again 3-4 hours of his time). To me it sounds like the operating agreement would cover that. What do you think? When you use the term foreign above is that equivalent to non resident?
__________________
MBlovr
'59 180 Dad's original
'59 180 Dad's 2nd one
'67 250SE Dad's last one
'59 220 SE My first one
'62 220SE Coupe second one
'89 190E 2.6 5spd third one
'06 E350 4matic (sold)
'10 E350 4matic
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-22-2009, 09:38 PM
dynalow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBlovr View Post
First of all thank you kindly for your helpful response. In addition to the LLC the attorney wanted us to have a cotenancy agreement for I thought the reasons that you gave above ie if one of us wants to sell(again 3-4 hours of his time). To me it sounds like the operating agreement would cover that. What do you think? When you use the term foreign above is that equivalent to non resident?
CA's Articles of Organization has 7 questions and has a filing fee of $70.00.
View it here.
http://www.sos.ca.gov/business/llc/forms/llc-1.pdf

By "foreign" I was indeed referring to any CA non-resident.

I do not know whether the "co-tenancy" agreement refers to an agreement between LLC members or between the landlord (LLC) and tenants under CA law. MY gut tells me it deals with tenant/landlord matters and not matters involving partner actions between themselves or between partners and the LLC. ( I am using the term partner interchangeably with member, which is the formal name for an individual or business investor/owner in an LLC.)

Hope this helps.
edit:
The more I thought about this, the more I think cotenancy agreement may relate to the way the property is titled to the several owners (as in "tenants by the entirety", "tenants in common", etc.) I think CA is a community property state and that term -- "cotenancy" -- may be common in CA legal circles or other community property states.
If this assumption is correct, a "cotenancy agreement" (whatever that is) would likely deal with legal ownership of the property. An LLC Operating Agreement would deal with the business rights, duties and obligations of the members (partmers). There may be some overlapping, but they two terms may not refer to the same legal document.

I'm not an attorney, so don't take anything I say as legal advice. That's what California lawyers are for.

Last edited by dynalow; 09-23-2009 at 10:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-23-2009, 12:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynalow View Post
partner
Member?

Right on with the Operating Agreement. LLC is pretty much useless without it if it gets sued.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:20 AM
dynalow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Doe View Post
Member?

Right on with the Operating Agreement. LLC is pretty much useless without it if it gets sued.
Laziness on my part. From a tax end, as you know, most multi member LLC's are now classified by default as partnerships under IRS guidelines, unless an election is made to be taxed as a corporation.
That being the case, it's just old habits dying hard (from a couple of pre-LLC decades in the saddle) in referring to members as partners, since the tax return (Form 1065) filed by LLC's predominately uses the term "Partner".
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynalow View Post
CA's Articles of Organization has 7 questions and has a filing fee of $70.00.
View it here.
http://www.sos.ca.gov/business/llc/forms/llc-1.pdf

By "foreign" I was indeed referring to any CA non-resident.

I do not know whether the "co-tenancy" agreement refers to an agreement between LLC members or between the landlord (LLC) and tenants under CA law. MY gut tells me it deals with tenant/landlord matters and not matters involving partner actions between themselves or between partners and the LLC. ( I am using the term partner interchangeably with member, which is the formal name for an individual or business investor/owner in an LLC.)

Hope this helps.
edit:
The more I thought about this, the more I think cotenancy agreement may relate to the way the property is titled to the several owners (as in "tenants by the entirety", "tenants in common", etc.) I think CA is a community property state and that term -- "cotenancy" -- may be common in CA legal circles or other community property states.
If this assumption is correct, a "cotenancy agreement" (whatever that is) would likely deal with legal ownership of the property. An LLC Operating Agreement would deal with the business rights, duties and obligations of the members (partmers). There may be some overlapping, but they two terms may not refer to the same legal document.

I'm not an attorney, so don't take anything I say as legal advice. That's what California lawyers are for.
Thanks again your input is very helpful. With your explanation this stuff is now beginning to make a little sense and after reading what you said and rereading what the attorney said I am beginning to read his stuff in a different light and think that he is just doing his job.

__________________
MBlovr
'59 180 Dad's original
'59 180 Dad's 2nd one
'67 250SE Dad's last one
'59 220 SE My first one
'62 220SE Coupe second one
'89 190E 2.6 5spd third one
'06 E350 4matic (sold)
'10 E350 4matic

Last edited by MBlovr; 09-23-2009 at 11:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page