http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/spiritual/pictures/news.php?q=1254861706

THEY WON

__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)

If you want to see how really, really, really bad Detroit is, go to google maps satellite view and do the street view. Click almost any street in the city N,S,E or W and you can see abandoned houses or empty lots. The Packard plant still stands as a sad symbol of the decay, about sixty years after Packard went out of business.

Someone here suggested a while back that there ought to be a national contest of city planners to come up with ideas for rebuilding Detroit from the ground up. Not a bad idea. Put all Michigan's unemployed to work with dozers and shovels and level the city. Start with a clean slate. Wouldn't that be better than just sending checks to stay home and go down to the unemployment office once a month.

The future in Detroit must begin with massive demolition.

Youtube has a few tour videos. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6WKMNmFsxM

Sure you're not talking about New Orleans? Where is the money gonna come from to pay people to destruct things?

Sad,,, real sad. Looks like a war zone.

__________________
95 SL500 Smoke Silver, Parchment 64K
07 E350 4matic Station Wagon White 34K
02 E320 4Matic Silver/grey 80K
05 F150 Silver 44K

From the same place the "extended unemployment benefits" come from. Washington. AKA: deficit spending!
You know, borrowing from China.

Well we certainly could borrow a couple of hundred billion dollars and do that but once you've rebuilt Detroit what happens next?

Without some sort of underlying economic structure its going to be right back where it started in, oh I'd guess 8-10 years. What supports Detroit after the rebuilding is competed? Government welfare checks? Or maybe some Casinos?

Our leaders today seem to constantly address the symptom of the problems without ever addressing the root causes of the decay. From my perspective the root cause of the problem is the de-industrilization of America - and the loss of hundreds of thousands of high paying value added jobs that built and sustained the middle class in Detroit.

__________________
98 Dodge-Cummins pickup (123k)
13 GLK250 (135k)
06 E320CDI (323K)
16 C300 (62K)
82 300GD Gelaendewagen (54K)

Agreed, U.S. manufacturing is long gone and not coming back. The rust belt cities are going to have to figure out how to reinvent themselves for this century. This has be obvious for the last 30 years, a little planning would have been nice. It can be done, Pittsburgh did it in the 80s/90s and is now doing pretty well.

The "hundreds of thousands of high paying value added jobs that built and sustained the middle class" were a large part of the problem. Domestic manufacturing companies never learned to control their labor cost, so they're gone. The real "value added" isn't in the manufacturing, that can be done anyplace.

Those pics of Detroit are really disheartening. They were the hustle and bustle of midwestern industry 30 years ago. On a side note, those pics of modern day Hiroshima are almost surreal. Such a colorful environment. Makes for a REAL view if you can afford a penthouse in that rainbow environment.

__________________
1989 300E 144K

Then why can't it be done in Detroit again? I think it could if we established an environment that permitted it to happen.

Everyone seems to think that the de-industrilization of America is just a "change" in the way our economy operates. Their view is that a service based economy is just as good and can build long-term wealth and prosperity equally effectively as an economy based upon manufacturing value added products.

I'm not sure I agree with this view, can you name a modern country that has ever survived as a world power that didn't have a vibrant manufacturing base?

If our view about service based economies is correct, and that those economies are better and more stable than one based on manufacturing, why isn't China and the other emerging economies pursuing the "service based" model of economic development?

__________________
98 Dodge-Cummins pickup (123k)
13 GLK250 (135k)
06 E320CDI (323K)
16 C300 (62K)
82 300GD Gelaendewagen (54K)

They're using stupid photography to make Hiroshima look like a carnival or something. I've been to both cities, Hiroshima is the dirtiest city in Japan, but cleaner than any in the United States. The atomic memorial is sweet too.

All of Detroit looks like Hiroshima's atomic bomb building. It sort of happens when your population is half of what it once was. Detroit should just make half of the city unincorporated so the hundreds of people who still live there don't have to pay to attempt to maintain a half empty city.

__________________
1980 240d
1999 SL500

urban decay....someone just punched the air out of my lungs.

__________________
"It's normal for these things to empty your wallet and break your heart in the process."
2012 SLK 350
1987 420 SEL

Sure, we can still do manufacturing in Detroit if we can do it better/cheaper than the rest of the world. At the moment that means significantly reduced labor costs. Do we really want to participate in this "race to the bottom"?

If/when the economies and wages of the rest of the world catch up with the U.S./EU it might make sense. In the mean time, if you want a higher wage job than someone in china, you need to be able to do something that they are not able to do (yet). If you want to keep you wages higher than you counterpart in china, you need to innovate faster than they do. Look at the computer industry, they outsource all their manufacturing while keeping all the value added work at home (U.S. or Japan). This only works because they are innovating very quickly.

I don't think the historical argument works in this case, it's not applicable to the smaller/flatter world. I'm sure someone said "no one has every won a war without a strong calvary" at the beginning of WW1. Also, I don't even know what "world power" will mean in 50 years, but I doubt it will have anything to do with having steel mills and making the most jeeps.

I think the emerging economies will transfer to a "service based" model much more quickly than the west did. As soon as their labor costs are not competitive, they will start outsourcing. I read someplace that some industries in china are now outsourcing labor to african countries. Eventually, world economies will become more level and the rate of outsourcing will be reduced; but as long as they are inequities in the labor market, they will be exploited.

The job base is gone, Detroit needs to figure out how to get companies to move their. From the videos I have seen online of the city meetings thats not going to happen.

Unless something changes in 100 years Detroit is going to be mostly farms.

__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200