| JollyRoger |
03-29-2010 12:05 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by MercFan
(Post 2436095)
Just finished reading 'End the Fed' by Ron Paul - very interesting reading... and quite disturbing. Had some questions that after reading:
1) If FED can print all the money they ever want (discusting and dishonest) - then why does US ever need to borrow money from China - why not just print more?!
2) Are there ANY countries in the world that are stilll on Gold Standard?!
3) In a system that does not have central banking - who would print more money and what economic conditions would require it?
I strongly agree with the position Dr. Ron Paul is taking regarding the Fed's dishonest practices regarding our money - what's your opinion?!
James
|
1) More money has to be printed in order to account for the natural growth in population. But if you print too much, then interest rates have to rise, and I'm going to suggest you take a college course in economics to find out why, since I'm just not that interested in typing it all out for you.
2) Very few, if any. Some countries don't have any gold at all, perhaps they could use a "goat standard" I suppose, but most countries use the current system of valuing currency much in the way stock is valued, the net asset value of the country is what determines the value of it's currency. The current net asset value of the United States is determined in a shorthand kid of way by simply looking at the Dow Jones numbers for the day. Using that as a way to look at the situation, the Dow stands about the same place it did in 1999, which means the net asset value of the United States decreased in the last ten years in relation to population growth and inflation. This in turn is reflected in the value of our currency, which has decreased a proportional amount in that time, to reflect the realties of America most of those on the American Right refuse to see. Paul is one of them. If we went on the gold standard, we would simply just start trading gold for cheap Chinese junk and gas, nothing would really change, we would simply be setting ourselves up for the next Great Depression when the price of gold either rose out of sight or dropped like a rock as we pushed all we had on the world market to purchase our last barrel of cheap oil. The secret to solving Dr. Paul's problem is not gold, it is increasing the net asset value of the United States. That is done by having an economy that produces things the rest of the world wants to buy, something we seem unable to do.
3) In the old days, banks printed their own money, redeemable in gold at their banks. The problem is, gold simply becomes a new variable in the equation. Scarcity of gold or a sudden increase in supply cause inflationary and deflationary pressures on gold prices, causing them to increase or decrease dramatically. Since the bank is the one left holding the bag, they can fail quite easily no matter what they do, one of the reasons we got off the gold standard. Prior to 1932, the US routinely suffered severe economic dislocations called "Panics", most due to disruption in gold and silver prices that caused bank failures. When a bank fails, lots of people get hurt, especially back then when there was no deposit insurance.
And to your last question, in the modern world, Dr. Paul's ideas are insane.
|