Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2010, 02:20 PM
benhogan's Avatar
CPA/Greasemonkey
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chapel Hill
Posts: 1,092
Afghanistan/Vietnam question

I was just watching a National Geographic documentary on the Afghanistan war.

This was is eerily similar to the Vietnam war.
1. the 'no see ums' enemy
2. the hearts and minds strategy
3. the booby traps
4. seems like it's been going on a a long time

How do you win a war if you don't know who the enemy is? I wonder if they have an exit strategy. A better question-- how do you know if you have "won"?

__________________
Ben
1987 190d 2.5Turbo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2010, 03:08 PM
buffa98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 296
Well I am the generation whose fathers were the Vietnam Vets so I can tell you what was told to me. From a military stand point we won every battle in nam. But because of the political climate at that point all the media would do was show the body counts on the news.


The other point was the hit and run tactics that the VC used were very effective destroying morale because you never knew when and where the next hit was coming from.

Kind of like where we are now: these different tribes of people have been fight for thousands of years. They dont like each other and never will right now they are united against us as the common enemy. When we pull out I have a firm belief that with in 15-20 years we will be in the same boat again.
__________________
86 300SDL. 250,xxx on #14 Head. One eye always on temp gauge.. Cruising towards 300K
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-12-2010, 03:21 PM
benhogan's Avatar
CPA/Greasemonkey
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chapel Hill
Posts: 1,092
So how do you know if you have 'won' that war?

This is the perplexing part for me.

Maybe if they can convince those poppy farmers to stop farming and open 7-11's and Days Inns instead.
__________________
Ben
1987 190d 2.5Turbo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-12-2010, 04:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
If the US had given serious thought to the experience of the French in Vietnam and the British and Russians in Afghanistan, the decision to go to war might have been different.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2010, 04:41 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,627
Its a no win situation. We wage a conventional war against an indigent guerrilla movement. they blend in and move freely. We stand out and move in large armored targets. Politically it is no win too.

Not too different from when Italy attacked Etheopia prior to WW2, or our revolutionary war against the British. it is their country, all they have to do is survive and eventually we will leave and they can go back to what they were doing before.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:12 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Neither was intended to be a "war" with the goal of defeating an enemy and capturing real estate. One was a "proxy war" that neither side wanted to escalate beyond the third world; i.e., neither side wanted to "win," they just wanted the other side to blink first (so they could move another chess piece). The other is essentially a "police action"; a hunt for bad guys in a country that does not particularly want the US there but doesn't have much choice in the matter. It's pretty obvious that in the first case the military leadership didn't understand the nature of the conflict, and in the second case they were never given sufficient resources to do the job. In both cases the results were predictable.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2010, 06:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: S. Texas
Posts: 1,237
The US news media reporting body counts in Vietnam or political pressure had NOTHING to do with the US loosing that war. The US was just plain out-fought.

The French tried to tell Eisenhower to stay out and he wouldn't listen. He was just going to put in a few 'advisors' and help the locals. A few turned into 500k. In the end it would have been cheaper to give each Vietcong a mansion in Beverly Hills and a million dollars than to kill him. I read lately that it took an average of 50k rounds of ammo to kill one Vietcong.

We should have not been in Vietnam or Somalia, both of which we lost and we sure as hell should not be in Iraq or Afghanistan, both of which we will loose.

Can you imagine the schools, medical care, infrastructure, etc. that that kind of money could buy. And in all these cases the only people who won were military equipment suppliers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2010, 06:37 PM
Fulcrum525's Avatar
Sing Blue Silver
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Its a no win situation. We wage a conventional war against an indigent guerrilla movement. they blend in and move freely. We stand out and move in large armored targets. Politically it is no win too.

Not too different from when Italy attacked Etheopia prior to WW2, or our revolutionary war against the British. it is their country, all they have to do is survive and eventually we will leave and they can go back to what they were doing before.
Guerrilla wars are nasty but they can be won, you just have to know how to do it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2nd_Boer_War#Third_phase:_Guerrilla_war_.28September_1900_.E2.80.93_May_1902.29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_warfare#Counter-guerrilla_warfare

(It's sad how you can just check off on that list all of the failures in Afghanistan)
__________________
1982 300GD Carmine Red (DB3535) Cabriolet Parting Out
1990 300SEL Smoke Silver (Parting out)
1991 350SDL Blackberry Metallic (481)

"The thing is Bob, its not that I'm lazy...its that I just don't care."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-12-2010, 06:51 PM
Skid Row Joe's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: #KeepingAmericaGreat!
Posts: 7,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by benhogan View Post
I was just watching a National Geographic documentary on the Afghanistan war.

This was is eerily similar to the Vietnam war.
1. the 'no see ums' enemy
2. the hearts and minds strategy
3. the booby traps
4. seems like it's been going on a a long time

How do you win a war if you don't know who the enemy is? I wonder if they have an exit strategy. A better question-- how do you know if you have "won"?
ANSWER:
3,000 Americans, (2) 110 story office buildings, in NYC, and (4) civilian airliners don't get killed or destroyed every few weeks on American soil - by Muslim extremists.

That's "how you know we have won......"
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-12-2010, 07:14 PM
Fold on dotted line
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SE Mich
Posts: 3,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by buffa98 View Post
Well I am the generation whose fathers were the Vietnam Vets so I can tell you what was told to me. From a military stand point we won every battle in nam. But because of the political climate at that point all the media would do was show the body counts on the news.


The other point was the hit and run tactics that the VC used were very effective destroying morale because you never knew when and where the next hit was coming from.

Kind of like where we are now: these different tribes of people have been fight for thousands of years. They dont like each other and never will right now they are united against us as the common enemy. When we pull out I have a firm belief that with in 15-20 years we will be in the same boat again.
Having trained the ARVN artillery and spent 13 months with these people, I can only speak about personal experiences. There do seem to be some big differences AND some big similarities:

1. In VietNam, the issue was who had greater influence: China+Russia (through the VietMinh) or the US + the Diem government. This is in stark contrast to the dynamic among secular vs tribal govts vs AQ-backed Taliban. A different three-way conflict.

2. In a tribe-based government, there will never be freedom. It is the crudest form of government, with littl chance for change, completely dependent on the personality of the tribal chief in power at the moment. Any government rooted in religion stays the same and strongly resists change. The religion is typically exploited to reinforce the power structure. This was true with Christian kings before; and is true now both with Taliban and NON-Taliban tribes. It's about the power and keeping it.
__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-12-2010, 07:22 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
You can't win a hearts and minds war, it just drags you into the other guys politics. The only way to win such a war is to kill enough people until the hearts and minds come to you, since you are all that's left. The Russians tried this, it doesn't work in a country like that.


The only way we could possible "win" in Afghanistan since they have no country to destroy, would be to set up camps and systematically kill off enough of the tribes so the ones that fight have no one left to fight. Than we would have to colonize them for several generations while they adopt our style of thinking.

So in other words its time to leave.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-12-2010, 07:48 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
You can't win a hearts and minds war, it just drags you into the other guys politics. The only way to win such a war is to kill enough people until the hearts and minds come to you, since you are all that's left. The Russians tried this, it doesn't work in a country like that.


The only way we could possible "win" in Afghanistan since they have no country to destroy, would be to set up camps and systematically kill off enough of the tribes so the ones that fight have no one left to fight. Than we would have to colonize them for several generations while they adopt our style of thinking.

So in other words its time to leave.
It's even worse than that. The only way to sort out Afghanistan is to sort out Pakistan at the same time because their border is non-existant and the same people that the US military is chasing are working with Pakistan on the Indian border. I don't think the US is willing to open that can of worms; definitely time to leave.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-12-2010, 07:56 PM
Fulcrum525's Avatar
Sing Blue Silver
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
It's even worse than that. The only way to sort out Afghanistan is to sort out Pakistan at the same time because their border is non-existant and the same people that the US military is chasing are working with Pakistan on the Indian border. I don't think the US is willing to open that can of worms; definitely time to leave.

Agreed. But what happens to Afghanistan when NATO pulls out?
__________________
1982 300GD Carmine Red (DB3535) Cabriolet Parting Out
1990 300SEL Smoke Silver (Parting out)
1991 350SDL Blackberry Metallic (481)

"The thing is Bob, its not that I'm lazy...its that I just don't care."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-12-2010, 08:23 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fulcrum525 View Post
Agreed. But what happens to Afghanistan when NATO pulls out?
The tribes will take over and go back to growing poppies without being harassed. The people who cooperated with the US will need to disappear. Same thing that happened after the soviets left.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-12-2010, 08:55 PM
benhogan's Avatar
CPA/Greasemonkey
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chapel Hill
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe View Post
ANSWER:
3,000 Americans, (2) 110 story office buildings, in NYC, and (4) civilian airliners don't get killed or destroyed every few weeks on American soil - by Muslim extremists.

That's "how you know we have won......"
OK. Now how long do you propose we keep doing this?

I just feel sorry for all those civilians on the documentary. They don't look like they would have anything to do with blowing up buildings. They all looked so poor begging for water from the soldiers.
Hardly the type I think but what do I know?

What do you propose?

__________________
Ben
1987 190d 2.5Turbo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page