I stopped reading at page four... people who do not believe in evolution crack me up, but not enough to continue reading.

With one MAJOR difference. The theist traces the universe back to mind (a personal mind, no less for most theists) whereas the non-theist traces it back to matter.
The role that the human mind plays in those two different universes couldn't be more different. One says the human mind was the goal of the whole process, other other says it is an accidental byproduct of non-mental change.

That's what Facebook does to you. It's the "evolution of decaying intelligence". :D

Isn't this exactly the same argument in reverse as posed by Honus, above.

What caused the Big Bang?

Although we don't have the science to explain that, I am still reluctant to believe an invisble, all knowing, anthropomorphic being in the sky caused it.

^^^ Why must it be a binary decision?

No real reason for the binary one. The anthropomorphic answer can be lined up right alongside the idea that the universe was created by a giant cockroach.

Lots of work has been poured into that question
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-theory
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0509137

I am aware of that and can summarize it thus: "I dunno".

Again, you suppose that the alternatives must be something imaginable. Why?

The version I read was, "I dunno and neither do you. In fact the whole thing is impossible, any sane person can see that."

I just happened to imagine one. I never said the alternatives had to be imaginable.

You, me and Doug Adams.

That frood really knew where his towel was.