Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

View Poll Results: Is high speed rail the answer?
Yes 4 50.00%
No, I'll take my car on regular rail 3 37.50%
No, I'll fly with my car like Auric Goldfinger and Simon Templar 1 12.50%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-16-2011, 02:36 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
The tax rates of 10 years ago weren't the "Leave it to Beaver" days. They were equitable and allowed for a more-or-less balanced budget without high inflation. I'm talking about going back to the Clinton days, not the 50s!

Nah, just fumigate the house with cyanide to get rid of an infestation of venomous scorpions.
I'd go with less as far as the balanced budget goes. We were running a deficit for a long time before Clinton came on the scene and that was with a better economy.

Assuming your cyanide doesn't leak out or get into something you don't want, it works for the moment. Call it unintended side effects. They usually are present with any action. But lets say you get the easy part done. What next? If you insist on bring scorpions back, you are back to square 1, aren't you? Saying "You're FIRED" is easy and satisfying. Hiring the right replacement is going to be more tricky considering the pool of candidates that will submit their names for the job. Ideally you want a strong benevolent dictator who can do what is necessary to get the job done without worrying about the political fallout. It would be much easier to build yourself a 10 lane expressway from California to Hawaii than to find such an impossibility. Even getting the sun to rise in the West might be easier.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-16-2011, 02:38 PM
iwrock's Avatar
roflmonster
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hella NorCal
Posts: 3,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
But can you do it consistantly? Besides, on most European (except for Spain and the Chunnel) and American (read: Northeast Corridor) high-speed trains, there is little security. You can show up at the station 10 min before the train leaves and it would work fine.
Yes, I could do this consistently.
__________________
-Justin

91 560 SEC AMG - other dogs dd
01 Honda S2000 - dogs dd
07 MB ML320 CDI - dd
16 Lexus IS250 - wifes dd

it's automatic.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-16-2011, 02:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Where's the option for, "I'll just drive"?

A car will consistently beat a plane for trips up to about 200 miles or so, and it's not until about 300 miles that the plane is clearly a quicker way to travel. If we reformed speed limits the car would probably win out to 300+ miles.

The idea of taking my car on a train and having it to drive at my destination sounds somewhat appealing, but I wonder how the cost would compare to flying and then renting a plastic POS.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-16-2011, 04:45 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texafornia
Posts: 5,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by gatorblue92 View Post
I took my 240D on that about 6 years ago when I brought the car from Miami to Philly where I was living at the time. It was a fun trip but I would have arrived faster if I had driven. The train was scheduled to arrive in DC at 8 am but we got there after lunch. The problem with Amtrak is they don't own the lines so CSX trains get priority.
What was the tab to amtrak haul the car form Miami to philly?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-16-2011, 05:17 PM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Now that the cost has ballooned greatly past what was represented to the electorate, I think it needs to go back on the ballot. People need to understand that they were lied to about the actual cost and to understand that at this point what they approved won't even get them to the Grapevine (from either direction).


I do like that they are starting it in the middle of nowhere. That way when funds run out, it will be completely useless, other than as a testament to government boondoggles.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-16-2011, 05:36 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post
Now that the cost has ballooned greatly past what was represented to the electorate, I think it needs to go back on the ballot. People need to understand that they were lied to about the actual cost and to understand that at this point what they approved won't even get them to the Grapevine (from either direction).


I do like that they are starting it in the middle of nowhere. That way when funds run out, it will be completely useless, other than as a testament to government boondoggles.
To what end? Even if there is a testament, nobody will listen. It is always the video game mentality. Put another quarter and the game starts all over again. If not, people have to become more skeptical and not get so easily entranced by vague promises. Right now, they can promise the world, the voters can sit back happy knowing that they didn't scam their kids into paying for their own goodies. It's not that we don't learn. We don't want to learn. The truth sucks. If they learned the truth, they will not be able to ask for goodies. This way, they can honestly tell their kids "Well, I'm sorry that this bunch of BS hit you but when we approved it at the time, we honestly thought it was going to be good."
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:11 PM
mgburg's Avatar
"Illegal" 3rd Dist. Rep.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Onalaska, WI.
Posts: 221
Unhappy * It sucks when you have to do without... *

Amtrash's issues are myriad...subsidation isn't/hasn't been the answer. And when they're using someone else's tracks, considering the fact that many areas are so under-maintained, you're lucky they even allow passenger-carrying cars through those areas.

NOW, AS FOR THE HSR-FLIM-FLAM SHOW...

Wisconsin got a Governor that did the right thing and $h!t-canned that black-hole of a project.

1st off, the HSR was an "$800M" shot in the tax-payers' @$$ because it only connected the SE corner of Wisconsin with Madison...they hadn't decided if the the rest of the route was to go through either La Crosse or Eau Claire before it terminated in Minneapolis. Currently, Amtrash has a route through La Crosse onward toward the West, following up the Mississippi River through Winona and Red Wing, but that's it on the Wisconsin Western front.

Secondly, NOTHING was ever mentioned about the rest of the costs concerned with connecting the HSR to Minneapolis from Madison...we had a dog-damned debate about how the route should go from either Madison to La Crosse, or from Madison to Minneapolis-via-Eau Claire. The La Crosse route favored using the current Amtrash corridor and the Eau Claire alternative would have resulted in a whole new rail corridor...probably along the I-System route. Needless to say, it's a moot point now.

Third, but MOST IMPORTANTLY: The Maintainance/Infrastructure Issues: NO MENTION OF IT, WHATSOEVER. Hell, sweep that baby under the dirt after the bathwater and kid have been thrown out the back door during the "Smoke-filled Union/Kickback Back-Room" meetings have all been completed. AAMOF, try to ask that question N O W and see what kind of "politi-speak" response you're going to get. It will be, at least, enough pablum to drown an experienced swimmer in an Olympic-sized pool.

AND, if someone is stupid and dumb enough to attempt to put some numbers out there, I can ALMOST guarantee you that the numbers will be about 1/10 (I'm trying to be conservative with that fraction...) of what the actual costs will end up to be. NO WHERE have we seen ANY GOVERNMENTAL PROJECT come in at, near or even within a moon-shot of the original cost-estimates. Hell, even the $800M that was being bandied about for the Chicago/Milwaukee/Madison fiasco would have ended up running closer to $2B...and I'm probably about $1B short on that amount.

Trains are quaint little items for the old folks and those on pensions being funded by those still working. They're OK west of Chicago, slower than frick east of the Windy and Only-Dog-Knows how shakey anywhere else. HSR might work just fine in a country like Japan where a "motel" is nothing more than a bee-hive worth of tubes stacked on one another and in European countries, each countries' borders are no more than "Ohio-sized" in width and length.

But, in the US, where we haven't TOTALLY sunk the family budget into snake-oil mono-rail scams and we haven't been told (yet! ) that we're seeking multi-billion $$$$ loans from the IMF to keep the International bankers in gold-plated homes, it makes more sense to $h!t-can these debacles before they get a hound-dog's hold on the leg of common sense and responsible spending.

Simply put...

They are not needed.

Fix what you have. Bank for the future.
__________________
.

.
M. G. Burg
'10 - Dakota SXT - Daily Ride / ≈ 172.5K
.'76 - 450SLC - 107.024.12 / < .89.20 K
..'77 - 280E - 123.033.12 / > 128.20 K
...'67 - El Camino - 283ci / > 207.00 K
....'75 - Yamaha - 650XS / < 21.00 K
.....'87 - G20 Sportvan / > 206.00 K
......'85 - 4WINNS 160 I.O. / 140hp
.......'74 - Honda CT70 / Real 125

.
“I didn’t really say everything I said.”
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Yogi Berra ~
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:18 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgburg View Post
Fix what you have. Bank for the future.
Yep. Just like the cheating spouse that has been doing it since the beginning and now promises "But Honey. This time it will be different." Sure.
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-16-2011, 07:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
100 mph ... pbbbbbt. Proper high-speed rail is 120+ mph, and just try averaging 100 mph on an Interstate, regardless of police presence. Traffic, curves, stops for fuel and other things. Not gonna happen on a consistent basis.

And yeah, I've done 110 in a rental car between Phoenix and LA. Passed a trooper -- the guy didn't even blink. Must have been asleep
Back in 1979 two guys named Dave managed to average 87 mph from New York to LA in spite of the 55 mph speed limit. Read about it here: Cannonball Baker Sea-To-Shining-Sea Memorial Trophy Dash - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-16-2011, 07:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgburg View Post
Trains are quaint little items for the old folks and those on pensions being funded by those still working. They're OK west of Chicago, slower than frick east of the Windy and Only-Dog-Knows how shakey anywhere else. HSR might work just fine in a country like Japan where a "motel" is nothing more than a bee-hive worth of tubes stacked on one another and in European countries, each countries' borders are no more than "Ohio-sized" in width and length.
They may not work well in flyoveria, and no one is seriously proposing building a high-speed rail line across the country. They work fine in populated corridors -- Boston <-> NYC <-> DC and SF <-> LA <-> San Diego are actually perfect for them since the population density is similar to Europe over a fairly large area.

And actually, they're pretty fast east of Chicago as well -- I can either drive to my family's place in Virginia or take the train from NYC. The train takes about a half hour to an hour's less time (including the engine change at DC Union station, would be even faster if the line were electrified south of DC) plus I can do work or read on the train. The car ride via the mountains is fun and interesting, but gets old after the first few times.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 11-16-2011, 07:56 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
Why would you want to take your car with you? Just rent one at your destination.
I don't travel much. The last time I arrived at an airport and took transit was in Mexico City. Now that's a system to envy. Try that at SFO and you have to take a tram to San Bruno then BART to Millbrae and you're still within a mile of the airport! Everywhere I go in SoCal isn't convenient for transit. Many times we're a big group and they don't have enough Suburbans and full size vans. And hey, there's a perfectly good Suburban sitting in my driveway. This oversimplifies it but California high speed rail is over $90B now without a foot of track laid and remains unappealing to me. A ramp and a rail car would get me off I-5.

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-16-2011, 08:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
You're closer to SoCal than I am, and even I just get in my car and drive if I need to go there. I was making it to NAB Coronado from my house in 9 hours in a 240D when I was working down there. The trip back uphill took a little longer.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-17-2011, 11:10 AM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Raise taxes to appropriate levels, revoke all of the retard-chimp-era tax cuts immediately, and arrest everyone who voted for them for treason. (Yes, I'm willing to pay more to have a country with decent infrastructure and social services.)

Cut the murder/defense budget to half of its current size. Put a surtax on all liquid fossil fuels where the revenue goes into a trust fund to pay for alternative energy (incl nuclear) power plants, electric vehicle/hydrogen infrastructure, and both passenger and freight rail electrification.

Oh, and charge appropriate fares. If we're comparing to the Chunnel, the Chunnel is (now) largely self-sustaining.

The US is broke because the f***ing retards running the asylum want it to be broke, not because it needs to be broke.
Your point could have been well made without resorting to the "retard" cracks.
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-17-2011, 11:15 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampYankee View Post
Your point could have been well made without resorting to the "retard" cracks.
Well, they've acted like they lack something in the brain. What should I call them -- "geniuses on par with Einstein and Curie?"
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-17-2011, 11:40 AM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Well, they've acted like they lack something in the brain. What should I call them -- "geniuses on par with Einstein and Curie?"
IF they are retarded, what does that say of the voters? After all, they got elected legally.

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page