|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
BAR vs MG42...
Both are amazing guns, which one is better?
Browning Automatic Rifle - YouTube On one hand you have the BAR, which is a solid 20 pound chunk of American made steel, and ready for just about anything you can throw at it. Plus it fires the 30.06 round which is powerful as can be. When you fire a BAR, and I have, its pretty inspiring. The rifle weighs a ton, but the action is like a solid chunk of steel working. Its chunk, chunk, chunk, chunk as it cycles and fires. An extremely reassuring piece of gear. You really feel like you have a solid 20 rounds at play with a BAR. Facing the German MG-42 Machine Gun! - YouTube OTOH you have the MG42 which fires the formidable 8mm Mauser round. A very powerful and unpleasant round to be around. Hitlers buzz saw threw them out at over 1200 a minute. So in WW2 which rifle takes it? You have the German or the BAR designed by the legendary John Mosses Browning.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Depends on what you want to use it for. As a trench broom, the BAR wins. For defensive use, the 42 takes it with massively better sustained firepower. Considering the BAR got replaced with an updated version of the MG42, I'd say the 42 takes it overall.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
BAR. 1200 RPM is too freakin much.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
MG42. Physically formidable, as well as psychologically. Just thinking about that noise haunts me, let alone troopers who actually had the 'opportunity' to get personal with it. I don't think ze Germans made psych strengthening tapes about the BAR.
__________________
_______________________________________________ 1987 560SEL (210,000 miles) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Infantry weapons
Different horses for different courses.
Bar = squad level fire support for fire team fire and maneuver. Works best when coordinating with second BAR team. MG 42 Excellent defensive weapon and more of a platoon level weapon.
__________________
Anders 1995 E300 2015 VW TDI Sportwagen 15K 1977 240D (197K) 2002 Subaru Legacy L Wagon (115k) (Wife's) Gone but not forgotten: 2005 Buick LeSabre 1998 C230 1984 300D 1983 240D 1981 300SD 1974 240D 1974 Fiat 124 Spider 1968 Triumph TR250 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
x2 The question should be MG42 vs 30cal or 50cal as crew serviced machine guns or BAR vs MP40 or STG44 as squad infantry support
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Isn't it how many rounds hit the target that is important?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Let's ask those who were shot by them which they preferred.
I think the BAR was retired due to it's massive weight, in both the rifle and the gear required. Since the M-60 is simply our version of the M-42 and since that is what replaced it, I think it's the winner because imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Not when you're throwing that much lead into the air.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Isnt the BAR a world war 1 trench gun? its like a 30 year older design than the MG42 I thought. Excellent for the time, and certainly a good assault weapon with a powerful punch against bolt action rifles in a trench, but made for a different era
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
While it may have been born in the trenches, it was an incredibly effective weapon for the type of house-to-house fighting we encountered in Europe during WWII, because of the effectiveness of the 30-06 in penetrating walls. But the Garand was a 30-06 as well, so it's only real advantage was it's automatic firepower. Most soldiers saw them as just having to haul a lot of extra weight around for pretty much the same firepower as a Garand, effort that would be better spent hauling a .30 cal Browning MG, which was belt-fed and offered much greater sustained firepower over the constant clip change outs required by the BAR.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe the question should be...
VS The modern MG-3 versus the old M-60pig |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
That is an awesome weapon.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
You of all people know that the 2nd choice is not a rifle
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark Formerly... 2000 GMC Sonoma 1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021 2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels 1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles. 1984 123 200 1979 116 280S 1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille 1971 108 280S |
Bookmarks |
|
|