Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2011, 11:42 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
BAR vs MG42...

Both are amazing guns, which one is better?

Browning Automatic Rifle - YouTube
On one hand you have the BAR, which is a solid 20 pound chunk of American made steel, and ready for just about anything you can throw at it. Plus it fires the 30.06 round which is powerful as can be.

When you fire a BAR, and I have, its pretty inspiring. The rifle weighs a ton, but the action is like a solid chunk of steel working. Its chunk, chunk, chunk, chunk as it cycles and fires. An extremely reassuring piece of gear. You really feel like you have a solid 20 rounds at play with a BAR.

Facing the German MG-42 Machine Gun! - YouTube
OTOH you have the MG42 which fires the formidable 8mm Mauser round. A very powerful and unpleasant round to be around. Hitlers buzz saw threw them out at over 1200 a minute.

So in WW2 which rifle takes it? You have the German or the BAR designed by the legendary John Mosses Browning.

__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2011, 11:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Depends on what you want to use it for. As a trench broom, the BAR wins. For defensive use, the 42 takes it with massively better sustained firepower. Considering the BAR got replaced with an updated version of the MG42, I'd say the 42 takes it overall.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-25-2011, 12:05 AM
Ara T.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,075
BAR. 1200 RPM is too freakin much.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-25-2011, 12:30 AM
Solid Snake's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 327
MG42. Physically formidable, as well as psychologically. Just thinking about that noise haunts me, let alone troopers who actually had the 'opportunity' to get personal with it. I don't think ze Germans made psych strengthening tapes about the BAR.
__________________
_______________________________________________

1987 560SEL (210,000 miles)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-26-2011, 06:14 PM
Anders
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 412
Infantry weapons

Different horses for different courses.

Bar = squad level fire support for fire team fire and maneuver. Works best when coordinating with second BAR team.

MG 42 Excellent defensive weapon and more of a platoon level weapon.
__________________
Anders

1995 E300
2015 VW TDI Sportwagen 15K
1977 240D (197K)
2002 Subaru Legacy L Wagon (115k) (Wife's)
Gone but not forgotten:
2005 Buick LeSabre
1998 C230
1984 300D
1983 240D
1981 300SD
1974 240D
1974 Fiat 124 Spider
1968 Triumph TR250
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-27-2011, 09:21 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by andersbenz View Post
Different horses for different courses.

Bar = squad level fire support for fire team fire and maneuver. Works best when coordinating with second BAR team.

MG 42 Excellent defensive weapon and more of a platoon level weapon.

x2

The question should be MG42 vs 30cal or 50cal as crew serviced machine guns

or BAR vs MP40 or STG44 as squad infantry support
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-27-2011, 09:52 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
Isn't it how many rounds hit the target that is important?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-27-2011, 10:20 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Let's ask those who were shot by them which they preferred.

I think the BAR was retired due to it's massive weight, in both the rifle and the gear required. Since the M-60 is simply our version of the M-42 and since that is what replaced it, I think it's the winner because imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-27-2011, 10:21 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
Isn't it how many rounds hit the target that is important?
Not when you're throwing that much lead into the air.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-27-2011, 10:29 AM
JB3 JB3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 7,246
Isnt the BAR a world war 1 trench gun? its like a 30 year older design than the MG42 I thought. Excellent for the time, and certainly a good assault weapon with a powerful punch against bolt action rifles in a trench, but made for a different era
__________________
This post brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-27-2011, 10:46 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
While it may have been born in the trenches, it was an incredibly effective weapon for the type of house-to-house fighting we encountered in Europe during WWII, because of the effectiveness of the 30-06 in penetrating walls. But the Garand was a 30-06 as well, so it's only real advantage was it's automatic firepower. Most soldiers saw them as just having to haul a lot of extra weight around for pretty much the same firepower as a Garand, effort that would be better spent hauling a .30 cal Browning MG, which was belt-fed and offered much greater sustained firepower over the constant clip change outs required by the BAR.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-27-2011, 03:45 PM
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Nicht verantwortlich
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 911
Maybe the question should be...

VS

The modern MG-3 versus the old M-60pig
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-27-2011, 04:24 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
That is an awesome weapon.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-27-2011, 07:58 PM
Fulcrum525's Avatar
Sing Blue Silver
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
So in WW2 which rifle takes it? You have the German or the BAR designed by the legendary John Mosses Browning.
You of all people know that the 2nd choice is not a rifle
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-27-2011, 10:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by andersbenz View Post
Different horses for different courses.

Bar = squad level fire support for fire team fire and maneuver. Works best when coordinating with second BAR team.

MG 42 Excellent defensive weapon and more of a platoon level weapon.
Not really. The German philosophy was not defensive in 1934 when the MG34 was instituted. The weapon was a GPMG, that is general purpose machine gun. Used on a bipod from prone, or a tripod for long distance, or just held in the hands for close quarters. The German infantry squad was centered on the MG34/42 and the riflemen were there to support the machine gun, not vice versa.

- Peter.

__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page