Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-26-2012, 01:24 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
Plan to Disarm America?

http://www.libertygunrights.com/PL87-297WholeLaw.pdf

Freedom from War (1961)

Quote:
Globalist Plan to Disarm America:

PL87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act /
State Department Publication No.7277


by Bernadine Smith

If someday your children or grandchildren ask you how Liberty died in America and what happened that caused the demise of the Nation, read this and you will be able to answer them.
If they ask you why the Citizens have been disarmed, you'll know. If you want to know why, go to your local library, no matter where you live in the United States. Tell the librarian to show you where the 'United States Code books' are shelved. There are 25 books in the set. They are reddish-brown in color. They are printed by the Government Printing Office in Washington, DC. These hard-covered books are printed every 8-10 years. They are updated with annual soft-back supplements each year until a new hard cover issue comes out. At the present time, the 1988 hardbacks are on library shelves.
OPEN VOLUME 9. The page numbers are in the center near the middle binding. The section numbers are along the edges.
TURN TO PAGE 651. Here you will find Public Law 87-297 which calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every president since has worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you will not approve which is why they want to take away your firearms. (This is Title 22 USC section 2551)
TURN TO PAGE 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by "disarmament." The disarmament calls for the elimination of our armed forces. It also calls for the elimination of weapons of all kinds.
(This is Title 22 USC 2552 (a).
TURN TO PAGE 654. Here you will find it stated as item (a) "control, reduction and elimination of armed forces..." and as Item (d)" ...Elimination of armed forces...." What you need to know is that your armed forces are being eliminated and relinquished from national control which, in turn, wipes out our sovereignty as a nation. In two stages, we will have no more army, no more navy, no more air force. In the third stage, we shall have a "zero" military. Before Stage I closes, all citizen owned guns are to be banned.
(This is Title 22 USC Section 2571 (a).
Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the State Department Document called Publication 7277. Your librarian can also furnish you a copy. Also ask the librarian to get you a copy of "The Blue Print for the Peace Race." It is a 35-page booklet printed by the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency as Publication No. 4 - General Series 3 - Released May of 1962. Publication No. 4 is the unabridged version of State Department Document 7277.
Both of these booklets explain how our military is to be reduced to 2.1 million men. China and the Soviets are to be reduced to that level also. At this point, we are at Stage I at which time we are to transfer (on a permanent basis) one-half of our armed forces to be merged with the Russian and Chinese armies. In Stage II, the remaining one-half of our armed forces is then turned over to this same Security Council of the United Nations. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by agreement, always be a Russian. The world's smaller nations turn 100% of their armies over to the same under-secretary of the Security, Council in Stage II. President George Bush and Admiral Wm. J. Crowe [have referred] to this process as being "in transition."
TURN TO PAGE 655. On this page in Volume 9 of the United States Code, read "Policy Formation." The directives there (written in 1963 to pacify objectors) are supposedly to restrain anyone from disarmament, reducing or limiting our armaments, or taking guns away from the people unless it is pursuant to the treaty-making power of the president, or if it is authorized by further legislation by the Congress. (This is title 22, Section 2573.)
Every couple of years the House of Representatives votes to appropriate funds for this on-going program. Since P.L. 87-297 was first passed into law in 961, there have been 18 updates to it - all bad - with no deletions of these issues I lay before you now. The Congress knows that the plan includes the policing of the United States by foreign troops. (The world army they are forming in Europe.) The Congress is allowing our military bases to be closed down, except for those that will be used by the world army. You will find that plan in Publication 7277 and in "The Blueprint for the Peace Race."
If the president and Congress can promote a "Constitutional Convention" you will find yourself with two new constitutions (communist in structure) which in one states in Article VIII, Section 12: "No person shall bear arms or possess lethal weapons except the police and members of the armed forces...."
The Congress has praised these documents and is on record in Senate hearings seeking ways to install these constitutions. Ask your librarian for "Revision of the United Nations Charter - Hearings Before a Subcommittee (Foreign Relations) Feb. 2-20, 1950 U.S.Government Printing Office." Nothing has changed since. They are still viable. The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage III of the disarmament process is to "proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force...."
Anyone who doubts the truthfulness of what has been presented here is free to go to the library and go through the steps which have been outlined above. While you are at it, look up Public Law 101-216.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/guns/dos7277.htm


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2012, 01:32 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
I'm ore worried about the Amreicans.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-26-2012, 01:39 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
I've had my eyes on the actual treaty calling for the total disarmament of the United States by John F Kennedy. It is unbelievable that he was behind such bulls***. They aren't kidding, they really want one world military (to promote peace, of course). When they take old glory down from the flag pole and replace her with the flag of the United Nations you will know the end is near........

Last edited by HuskyMan; 07-26-2012 at 02:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2012, 01:53 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Yes and if B.O. & Hillary get their way, Old Glory won't be flying for very long.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2012, 02:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Hard to imagine that anyone actually believes this stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2012, 02:22 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
Go to the Library? Whoever made this screed up needs to join the 21st Century. But then, that might give away the fact this is nothing but nonsense.

If you are aware of this thing called Google you can enter United States Code and faster than you can say 'Hey-Presto!' you will be only one click away from the entire USC.

Enter anything you want on this subject into the search boxes and you will come back with.... Nothing.

I know this will mean nothing to the True Believers, but for those that can see several glaring errors in the essay right off the bat.......

Funny how this stuff always comes up around election time and it always involves Democrats.

Say......... Have you heard how the Democrats intend to return the Southwest to Mexico? Yup, the states of California, Nevada, Texas, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado; all of them are going to be turned over to Mexico as soon as the Dems control both Houses and the Prez's office. I know this is true because I received an e-mail on it. You see, there is this thing called NAFTA..........
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-2012, 03:20 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
Go to the Library? Whoever made this screed up needs to join the 21st Century. But then, that might give away the fact this is nothing but nonsense.

If you are aware of this thing called Google you can enter United States Code and faster than you can say 'Hey-Presto!' you will be only one click away from the entire USC.

Enter anything you want on this subject into the search boxes and you will come back with.... Nothing.

I know this will mean nothing to the True Believers, but for those that can see several glaring errors in the essay right off the bat.......

Funny how this stuff always comes up around election time and it always involves Democrats.

Say......... Have you heard how the Democrats intend to return the Southwest to Mexico? Yup, the states of California, Nevada, Texas, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado; all of them are going to be turned over to Mexico as soon as the Dems control both Houses and the Prez's office. I know this is true because I received an e-mail on it. You see, there is this thing called NAFTA..........
Hey Pooka, Presto! My search boxes come back full of USC.

Quote:
Title 22 USC Section 2551:

22 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2000 Edition
Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
CHAPTER 35 - ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT
SUBCHAPTER I - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 2551 - Congressional statement of purpose
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2551. Congressional statement of purpose

An ultimate goal of the United States is a world which is free from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of armaments; in which the use of force has been subordinated to the rule of law; and in which international adjustments to a changing world are achieved peacefully. It is the purpose of this chapter to provide impetus toward this goal by addressing the problem of reduction and control of armaments looking toward ultimate world disarmament.
The Secretary of State must have the capacity to provide the essential scientific, economic, political, military, psychological, and technological information upon which realistic arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament policy must be based. The Secretary shall have the authority, under the direction of the President, to carry out the following primary functions:
(1) The preparation for and management of United States participation in international negotiations and implementation fora in the arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament field.
(2) The conduct, support, and coordination of research for arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament policy formulation.
(3) The preparation for, operation of, or direction of, United States participation in such control systems as may become part of United States arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament activities.
(4) The dissemination and coordination of public information concerning arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament.
(Pub. L. 87–297, title I, §102, formerly §2, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 631; Pub. L. 94–141, title I, §144, Nov. 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 758; Pub. L. 103–236, title VII, §§703, 719(a), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 491, 501; renumbered §102 and amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1223(1), (21), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–768, 2681–772.)

Quote:
Title 22 USC Section 2552:
22 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2000 Edition
Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE
CHAPTER 35 - ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT
SUBCHAPTER I - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 2552 - Definitions
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov

§2552. Definitions

As used in this chapter—
(a) The terms “arms control” and “disarmament” mean the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement including the necessary steps taken under such an agreement to establish an effective system of international control, or to create and strengthen international organizations for the maintenance of peace.
(b) The term “Government agency” means any executive department, commission, agency, independent establishment, corporation wholly or partly owned by the United States which is an instrumentality of the United States, or any board, bureau, division, service, office, officer, authority, administration, or other establishment in the executive branch of Government.
(Pub. L. 87–297, title I, §103, formerly §3, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 631; renumbered §103 and amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1223(2), (21), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–769, 2681–772.)
Amendments

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–277, §1223(2), struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: “The term ‘Agency’ means the United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.”
Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.

Quote:
Title 22 USC Section 2571:
§2571. Research, development and other studies

The Director is authorized and directed to exercise his powers in such manner as to insure the acquisition of a fund of theoretical and practical knowledge concerning disarmament and nonproliferation. To this end, the Director is authorized and directed, under the direction of the President, (1) to insure the conduct of research, development, and other studies in the fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament; (2) to make arrangements (including contracts, agreements, and grants) for the conduct of research, development, and other studies in the fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament by private or public institutions or persons; and (3) to coordinate the research, development, and other studies conducted in the fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament by or for other Government agencies in accordance with procedures established under section 2575 of this title. In carrying out his responsibilities under this chapter, the Director shall, to the maximum extent feasible, make full use of available facilities, Government and private. The authority of the Director with respect to research, development, and other studies shall be limited to participation in the following insofar as they relate to arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament:
(a) Control, reduction and elimination of armed forces and armaments

the detection, identification, inspection, monitoring, limitation, reduction, control, and elimination of armed forces and armaments, including thermonuclear, nuclear, missile, conventional, bacteriological, chemical, and radiological weapons:
(b) Weapon detection and identification tests

the techniques and systems of detecting, identifying, inspecting, and monitoring of tests of nuclear, thermonuclear, and other weapons;
(c) Analysis of national budgets and economic indicators

the analysis of national budgets, levels of industrial production, and economic indicators to determine the amounts spent by various countries for armaments 1 and of all aspects of anti-satellite activities;
(d) Space, earth's surface and underwater regions

the control, reduction, and elimination of armed forces and armaments in space, in areas on and beneath the earth's surface, and in underwater regions;
(e) Structure and operation of international control

the structure and operation of international control and other organizations useful for arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament;
(f) Training of control system personnel

the training of scientists, technicians, and other personnel for manning the control systems which may be created by international arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements;
(g) Danger of war from accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack

the reduction and elimination of the danger of war resulting from accident, miscalculation, or possible surprise attack, including (but not limited to) improvements in the methods of communications between nations;
(h) Economic and political consequences of disarmament

the economic and political consequences of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament, including the problems of readjustment arising in industry and the reallocation of national resources;
(i) Disarmament implications of foreign and national security policies of United States

the arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament implications of foreign and national security policies of the United States with a view to a better understanding of the significance of such policies for the achievement of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament;
(j) National security and foreign policy implications of disarmament

the national security and foreign policy implications of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament proposals with a view to a better understanding of the effect of such proposals upon national security and foreign policy;
(k) Methods for maintenance of peace and security during stages of disarmament

methods for the maintenance of peace and security during different stages of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament;
(l) War prevention factors

the scientific, economic, political, legal, social, psychological, military, and technological factors related to the prevention of war with a view to a better understanding of how the basic structure of a lasting peace may be established;
(m) Other related problems

such related problems as the Director may determine to be in need of research, development, or study in order to carry out the provisions of this chapter.
(Pub. L. 87–297, title III, §31, Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 633; Pub. L. 88–186, §5, Nov. 26, 1963, 77 Stat. 342; Pub. L. 95–108, §3, Aug. 17, 1977, 91 Stat. 871; Pub. L. 97–339, §4, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1636; Pub. L. 103–236, title VII, §719(c), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 501.)
Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–236, in introductory provisions, substituted “fields of arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament” for “field of arms control and disarmament” in three places, in first sentence, inserted “and nonproliferation” after “disarmament”, and in fourth sentence, inserted “, nonproliferation,” after “arms control” wherever appearing.
1982—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–339 inserted “and of all aspects of antisatellite activities”.
1977—Pub. L. 95–108 struck out “United States” before “private” in cl. (2) of opening par.
1963—Pub. L. 88–186 inserted “United States” before “private” in cl. (2) of opening par.
Report on International Transfer of Conventional Arms

Pub. L. 92–352, title III, §302, July 13, 1972, 86 Stat. 495, directed Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, with cooperation of other agencies, to prepare a comprehensive report on international transfer of conventional arms and submit this report no later than one year after July 13, 1972, with an interim report submitted no later than six months after July 13, 1972.
Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 2579 of this title.
Funny how this stuff comes....damn looks like it's law.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-26-2012, 03:36 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudesky View Post
Hey Pooka, Presto! My search boxes come back full of USC.









Funny how this stuff comes....damn looks like it's law.

Good job Dude! Nothing like making him sick with his own medicine!
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-26-2012, 03:55 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
I was researching some things on the UN Arms Treaty that goes tomorrow and stumbled on the JFK link and kept looking. I think we have an agenda here. Like wonder what CFR talks about? I gotta hunch now.
What did Daddy Bush say about a new world order?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-26-2012, 04:06 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Goodness, I think there was an uptick in Alcoa shares today.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-26-2012, 04:19 PM
hill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Calif Sacramento
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
Goodness, I think there was an uptick in Alcoa shares today.
AA Up 2.7% yesterday
__________________
Happy Benzing
Darryl, Hill
2005 SL55 AMG Kleemanized
1984 500 SEC
1967 W113 California Coupe
[SIGPIC]
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-26-2012, 04:31 PM
elchivito's Avatar
ĦAy Jodido!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rancho Disparates
Posts: 4,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudesky View Post
Hey Pooka, Presto! My search boxes come back full of USC.

It shows up all right. Here is where it can be searched:

FDsys - Browse USCODE

Hey Doodsky, in fairness, why don't you copy and paste all the revisions and parts of that section that have been reworded or REPEALED over the years? Your so good at this. We know Larry will believe anything you post. He'd rather sprout wings and fly than actually read anything longer than a forwarded email.
__________________
You're a daisy if you do.
__________________________________
84 Euro 240D 4spd. 220.5k sold
04 Honda Element AWD
1985 F150 XLT 4x4, 351W with 270k miles, hay hauler
1997 Suzuki Sidekick 4x4
1993 Toyota 4wd Pickup 226K and counting
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-26-2012, 04:51 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by elchivito View Post
It shows up all right. Here is where it can be searched:

FDsys - Browse USCODE

Hey Doodsky, in fairness, why don't you copy and paste all the revisions and parts of that section that have been reworded or REPEALED over the years? Your so good at this. We know Larry will believe anything you post. He'd rather sprout wings and fly than actually read anything longer than a forwarded email.
Because they'll be *****ing about bandwidth.
That's why there is usually a link.
It has been amended and repealed and amended and it is still going forward.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-26-2012, 05:01 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texafornia
Posts: 5,493
uh OMG.
















Is sHERIFF jOE going to do it?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-26-2012, 05:29 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by panZZer View Post
uh OMG.













Is sHERIFF jOE going to do it?
Duh city when its US law.



And we'll all live together happily ever after.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page