Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-24-2002, 04:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally posted by Ashman
I still prefer innovation over copy catting what others invented.
Is the C43 still under warranty? Did you buy it used? Did the previous owner maintain it?

Let us know what kind of mileage your NSX has. Most japanese cars I have seen require lots of repairs after 100k miles
I bought the C43 new. It has 35K miles on it now. I maintain all of my cars very carefully, although I drive them very hard. The endless list of things that have broken have little or nothing to do with use or maintainance - seat controls, computers, sun roof switch, transmission control and on and on and on.

My NSX only has 85K miles on it, which is nothing for this car. Most go well over 200K miles before needing an overhaul (really just rings). I know of several with over 250K miles that are doing fine and a friend has 185K miles and just did the rings. He sprays a 150 shot of N2O on a regular basis or I'm sure it would have lasted longer. Mine runs 18 psi of boost and showed no real wear when I pulled it apart recently to put a ceramic coating on the pistons.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-24-2002, 04:46 AM
Ashman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 4,749
Sounds like you are a bonafide car man then hehe.

Also sounds to me like lots of the things are electrical gremlins or malfunctions. Btu mechanically, the car has been ok.

When I talk abotu copy catting, I mean that Japanese car makers have always looked to the germans for innovation and designs.

The lexus LS always seems to look a hell of a lot like an MB S class.

Acura at least keeps its cars mainly different styles than honda in the U.S.

Alon
__________________
'92 300CE - Sold
2004 C240 - 744 - C7 Wheels - Android Radio
2002 C320 - 816 - Sport Wagon
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-24-2002, 07:51 AM
Benzman500
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
All the problems you mentioned on camrys have not happened on my aunts 97. She ahs 139k on it and has had it since new. The love bugs took car of the paint on the front end and as for the inside well its not a benz. The worst thing so far is the timing belt you have to jack the engine up to even start the work. Personlly I hate the car its not a car for big people I fell like I gaint in there. Another complaint the front window is way to small! The stereo is pretty good.
my 2 cents
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-24-2002, 07:57 AM
Benzman500
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Along time ago I found a stie that was for Mercedes owners that hated there cars because of quality. I searched but could not find it. It even had the star with a frown in it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-24-2002, 09:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 1,080
<<
Also, not sure about US pricing, but a Camry here costs nearly as much as a C-Class.
>>

Here are the price for 2002. Apple to apples and they are all four door sedans with base prices:

2002 Mercedes Benz C Class: $30,500 - $49,900

2002 Toyota Camry: $18,970 - $25,405
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-24-2002, 10:03 AM
Eric
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There is no comparison, I drove a company car, a Camry for a few years and not only does it handle poorly, there is a rattle/squeak from the rear whenever I go over a bump which no mechanic at Toyota could fix.

In terms of handling, the MB gives much better feedback when cornering, braking and accelerating; and in a car accident, I definitely would rather be in a MB than any Toyota or Lexus. These are some of the many things I pay for when buying a solid German sedan, minor bugs in a complicated car do not bother me that much provided the dealer can fix the problems.

My experience with MBNA had been excellent. Perhaps many new MB buyers have unrealistic expectation in MBs? I know if I buy a Toyota and if it breaks down, I would go, hey, what do you expect!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-24-2002, 12:37 PM
BAd124's Avatar
German Car Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Saratoga Springs NY
Posts: 258
I think that this whole discussion in a way proves what MB is known for, quality engineering. Its the same thing in other parts of life as well, if someone that is recognized as the top athlete in thier sport misses a shot or messes up, you will hear alot more about it than if a no name does the same thing. When Jeremy McGrath didnt win a supercross race after winning all but one the season befor, ESPN didnt spend as much time covering who won that race as they did asking why Jeremy didn't. Mercedes is known for quality, though they may have let that slip a little in the past few years I believe it is still above other companies abilities in some areas. Yes Lexus builds a good car, but driving one is like driving a giant marshmellow. I understand that some people only look at one aspect to judge a car like quality or price but I would gladly spend a few more hours of work ON a car a year than have a car that I dont want to spend more than a few hours IN a year. Every company can produce lemons and you may have just gotten one. Please dont let this one incident tarnish your outlook on this brand. And if you really want to talk about $$$ repairs ask a mechanic about Jaguar and Audi.
__________________
88 300E
03 911 C4S
2008 Triumph Speed Triple

My pics --> www.BrettAdamsDesign.com
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-24-2002, 02:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally posted by Ashman
When I talk abotu copy catting, I mean that Japanese car makers have always looked to the germans for innovation and designs.
I am not sure that is entirely true. A lot of German companies are paying royalties to Japanes companies for things like balance shaft designs, etc. Also. consider my Honda - it is an all aluminum car designed and produced in 1990. All aluminum or titanium high rpm 4 valve motor with variable cams and a direct-fire ignition. What car from that era had that technology? Not Ferrari. Not Porsche. Heck, Ferrari is only now producing and all aluminum car and they had to get Alcola to show them how to do it. Not even Audi was up to speed back then. The Japanese were copy cats in the 60s and 70s, but not any more.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-24-2002, 02:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Posts: 63
pix

Quote:
Originally posted by Ashman
Got some pics of the C43 and NSX? I'd love to see em.

Alon
Here are some pix and a video of the Honda. The video is from a site that does test drives of performance cars. Keep in mind that the guy in the passenger seat yelling 'Jesus Christ!' does nothing but get rides in F-cars, P-cars, etc.

http://www.sportsnimports.com/images/fastnsx/
http://www.nextestdrive.net/internalimages/videofiles/nsx508hp_sm.mov

I don't have any of the C43, but it is bone stock, so it looks exactly like every other black C43.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-24-2002, 03:15 PM
This space for sale
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,380
All I got to say about that is.....WHOOOOOAAAAH!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-24-2002, 03:16 PM
tigerfox
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
MB build quality

Unquestionably MB build quality is not what it was,it is widely acknowledged both in Germany & UK.Engineering quality is still very good but slipping.The proof is in the huge rise in Warranty
expenditure by Daimler Chrysler which is significantly disproportionate to the increase in car sales.
Tigerfox.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-24-2002, 03:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally posted by blackmercedes
At $140,000 for an NSX, I'm glad to hear that they are made carefully. With most makes, price has no bearing on quality. With MB, the higher the price tag, generally the lower the reliability.
Huh? 1991 NSX sold for $57K. Brand new, you can drive away for less than $80K. Thanks for the compliment I guess.

By the way, in the JD Powers follow up survey (5 years after purchase), the NSX finished number one in owner satisfaction for reliability. Thats number one for ALL cars produced in 1991, not just sports cars.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-24-2002, 03:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally posted by Eric
Perhaps many new MB buyers have unrealistic expectation in MBs?
Hmmmm. Perhaps you are right; it may not be fair to hold MB to the standard I have come to expect from Honda. ; )
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-24-2002, 03:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Austin, Republic of Texas
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally posted by Ashman
I still prefer innovation over copy catting what others invented.

MB owns the patent on the first car. That says enough for me.
Alon
Did you post this from a Sperry-Univac? ; )
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-25-2002, 01:59 AM
mbz380se
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Maybe you should sell your C43 AMG and get a 500E or E500, if you are displeased with it.

The 500E is a legendary performance machine, feted by MB owners across the globe (ask anyone in the Hot-Rods forum). Plus, it is quite reliable for such a high-performance machine. A good deal faster than the C43 too, and the 500E was assembled by Porsche for M-B.

Oh yeah, and if a 500E gets in a fender-bender, hey, at least the body is made of steel.

And the M119 engine is a very common item, found in thousands and thousands of S-class sedans and SL roadsters. No problem finding reasonable fairly-priced replacement parts there.

-Sam

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MB Quality Robert Davis Tech Help 181 12-22-2010 09:29 AM
We must return to quality william rogers Off-Topic Discussion 45 06-23-2004 03:09 PM
rim quality brianw Mercedes-Benz Wheels & Tires 4 12-28-2002 11:54 PM
Uh oh! WSJ article hits MB hard Zach Maggio Off-Topic Discussion 17 06-02-2002 01:31 AM
What's happening to quality hudoff Tech Help 26 03-22-2001 12:09 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page