Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2012, 05:55 PM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Not really quite the "R" word...

For about the past two weeks on a local radio station I've heard a political radio spot supporting a couple of candidates in a bay area city race. Near the end of it, the spot says, "And after we vote for progress nationally, let's elect strong African-American leaders for our own community." (To the extent it's relevant, the City in question is Richmond, which has a large African-American population.)

To be honest, I didn't really think much about it the first time I heard it, but after hearing it several times I then started thinking about it in a different context.

What if you instead said, "let's elect strong White leaders" or "strong Mexican-American leaders" or "strong Jewish Leaders"...etc.

I don't really want to call it racism, since I'm not sure that was the ad's intent. But if you did stick "white" in there, boy, the outcry would be unbelievable.

In any event, considering that this is an American city that is located (duh) in the United States, what's so wrong about trying to elect strong "American" leaders...and ignoring skin color, creed and other factors that should be irrelevant?

In the end, if skin color is the deciding factor when you mark your ballot, haven't you just turned the clock back fifty years?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-02-2012, 06:02 PM
Dubyagee's Avatar
All fields are required
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE
Posts: 8,722
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post
For about the past two weeks on a local radio station I've heard a political radio spot supporting a couple of candidates in a bay area city race. Near the end of it, the spot says, "And after we vote for progress nationally, let's elect strong African-American leaders for our own community." (To the extent it's relevant, the City in question is Richmond, which has a large African-American population.)

To be honest, I didn't really think much about it the first time I heard it, but after hearing it several times I then started thinking about it in a different context.

What if you instead said, "let's elect strong White leaders" or "strong Mexican-American leaders" or "strong Jewish Leaders"...etc.

I don't really want to call it racism, since I'm not sure that was the ad's intent. But if you did stick "white" in there, boy, the outcry would be unbelievable.

In any event, considering that this is an American city that is located (duh) in the United States, what's so wrong about trying to elect strong "American" leaders...and ignoring skin color, creed and other factors that should be irrelevant?

In the end, if skin color is the deciding factor when you mark your ballot, haven't you just turned the clock back fifty years?
Exactly.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-02-2012, 06:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post
For about the past two weeks on a local radio station I've heard a political radio spot supporting a couple of candidates in a bay area city race. Near the end of it, the spot says, "And after we vote for progress nationally, let's elect strong African-American leaders for our own community." (To the extent it's relevant, the City in question is Richmond, which has a large African-American population.)

To be honest, I didn't really think much about it the first time I heard it, but after hearing it several times I then started thinking about it in a different context.

What if you instead said, "let's elect strong White leaders" or "strong Mexican-American leaders" or "strong Jewish Leaders"...etc.

I don't really want to call it racism, since I'm not sure that was the ad's intent. But if you did stick "white" in there, boy, the outcry would be unbelievable.

In any event, considering that this is an American city that is located (duh) in the United States, what's so wrong about trying to elect strong "American" leaders...and ignoring skin color, creed and other factors that should be irrelevant?

In the end, if skin color is the deciding factor when you mark your ballot, haven't you just turned the clock back fifty years?

The true Words Allways Hurt the MOST ;
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2012, 06:38 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post

I don't really want to call it racism............
............although that is exactly what it is.


You've been programmed to accept this sort of racism and also programmed to reject the same racism if the word "white" was placed in the same sentence.

In reality, you should not have needed to ponder the question.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2012, 06:49 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 47,537
Look at it from the other perspective. Look at the presidents of the past 200 years. Not a single woman, not a single non-christian white male till 2008. Look at the leadership of the US in general. There are more women but women make up 50% of the population. Look at minorities (some of whom are too minor any more) and look at their representation in government. Yes it is better then it was in the 1920's or 1960's but to think that we have a representative government I think it a bit optimistic.

Perhaps instead of saying lets elect a "X" person they should have said lets elects someone who represents us and will represents us.

Most of here have a MB. Would you go to a BMW specialist to work on your car or a MB specialist? I am not saying that a white person cannot represent the interests of a black person or Mexican or Muslim or what ever other group but I do think a black person is more capable (all other things being equal) of representing black interests.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-02-2012, 07:01 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
are we talking about in-group preference or racism?
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-2012, 07:10 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
.............. but I do think a black person is more capable (all other things being equal) of representing black interests.
Turn it around.

I want a white President because he's more capable of representing white interests.


How about if I posted that on the forum? I already know what you'd say to it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-02-2012, 07:14 PM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
............although that is exactly what it is.


You've been programmed to accept this sort of racism and also programmed to reject the same racism if the word "white" was placed in the same sentence.

In reality, you should not have needed to ponder the question.
Well, perhaps you'll pardon the expression, but I can't really see it quite so black and white as you seem to.

It may be that something in my makeup has made me a little more sensitive to the plight of African-American people in this country, and I can comprehend what often seems to be their distrust of the white man, the same as I can for the American Indians.

Nor can I blame those who may think that a "fellow" person of color might be more understanding and sympathetic to their situation. Of course at the national level that's utter nonsense, because neither BO nor MR has a good grasp of the commoner in our society, regardless of the commoner's skin color. But at the local level, yeah, I suppose it might make some manner of sense that the local guy who looks like you and talks like you (and presumably thinks like you) may have something else in common with you, too.

I suppose the real problem I have with it, after you peel back the "R" label, is that it just reinforces the old stereotypes. If at their core your beliefs about another person stem from the color of their skin, then that's really a bad sign, regardless whether your beliefs about them are positive or negative.

At the same time, however, we are talking in this discrete context about politicians. If you're trying to decide which liar you can trust more, I suppose skin color is as good a line of demarcation as any.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-02-2012, 07:20 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 47,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
Turn it around.

I want a white President because he's more capable of representing white interests.


How about if I posted that on the forum? I already know what you'd say to it.
Is that not what has been happening for the past 200+ years? I believe quite a few voters base their decision at least in part on race and gender. I do not think it needs to be posted because the voting history already seems to substantiate that American voters seem to prefer white candidates. The trend is shifting but I think it still is a large factor in US politics.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-02-2012, 07:49 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post
Well, perhaps you'll pardon the expression, but I can't really see it quite so black and white as you seem to.

It may be that something in my makeup has made me a little more sensitive to the plight of African-American people in this country, and I can comprehend what often seems to be their distrust of the white man, the same as I can for the American Indians.
It is, if you'll pardon the expression, "black and white".

Nothing wrong with being sensitive to the plight of minorities. However, when a minority or a majority decides that they need to favor a group due to their plight, that's racism.

You can be sympathetic to racism if you so choose, but don't try to hide behind oppression as an excuse to continue it.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-02-2012, 07:52 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash View Post
Is that not what has been happening for the past 200+ years? I believe quite a few voters base their decision at least in part on race and gender. I do not think it needs to be posted because the voting history already seems to substantiate that American voters seem to prefer white candidates. The trend is shifting but I think it still is a large factor in US politics.
Of course that's what has been happening.

Doesn't make it any less racist.........no matter which way you turn it.

I'll hazard a guess to say that all people are racist to some degree...........even those that vehemently deny it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-02-2012, 08:52 PM
Jorn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TheFlyingDutchManInHollywood
Posts: 6,865
The ones that deny being it are the worst.

__________________
1979 Black on Black, 300CD (sold), 1990 Black 300SE, Silver 1989 Volvo 780, 1988 300CE (vanished by the hands of a girlfriend), 1992 300CE (Rescue).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page