PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/)
-   -   Of course - the most sane, safe, and logical answer (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/332327-course-most-sane-safe-logical-answer.html)

TwitchKitty 12-23-2012 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3071598)
Well if you gun gets stolen out of you house and is used to murder someone I would like to see you in jail for a very very long time.

I do not understand the issue with locking up guns when they are not in use and no one is present.

Who you gonna lock up if it is a corporate owned or government owned gun?

cmbdiesel 12-24-2012 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwitchKitty (Post 3071918)
Who you gonna lock up if it is a corporate owned or government owned gun?

First in line of responsibility.

buffa98 12-25-2012 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3071598)
Well if you gun gets stolen out of you house and is used to murder someone I would like to see you in jail for a very very long time.

I do not understand the issue with locking up guns when they are not in use and no one is present.

So if someone steals your car and crashes into a crowd,killing a bunch of people,should YOU or the person that stole your car be held responsible?

Objects whether guns,cars, or knives can not do anything unless someone picks them up and uses them for evil.

cmbdiesel 12-26-2012 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buffa98 (Post 3072872)
So if someone steals your car and crashes into a crowd,killing a bunch of people,should YOU or the person that stole your car be held responsible?

Objects whether guns,cars, or knives can not do anything unless someone picks them up and uses them for evil.

OK, as long as we cannot shake the apples and oranges car comments...

If you left your keys in the car with kids in it, and they started the car and ran people over.... Do you think you have any liability?

davidmash 12-26-2012 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buffa98 (Post 3072872)
So if someone steals your car and crashes into a crowd,killing a bunch of people,should YOU or the person that stole your car be held responsible?

Objects whether guns,cars, or knives can not do anything unless someone picks them up and uses them for evil.

Cars are not guns and guns are not cars. Different rules apply. Not sure why people insist on treating them as equals.

cmbdiesel 12-26-2012 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3072898)
Cars are not guns and guns are not cars. Different rules apply. Not sure why people insist on treating them as equals.

Cars, hammers, guns.... they are all the same. Sporks too, a person who really cared could find a way to kill people with a spork....

If sporks are outlawed, only outlaws will have sporks.

Botnst 12-28-2012 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmbdiesel (Post 3071656)
When you assume....

By definition, the weapon is not in your control if you don't have the ability to take it into your hands. It may be in a controlled environment....

Would you leave the cash equivalent of your gun lying on the kitchen table when you are not home?

I know I don't.... not expecting to get broken into and burglarized, but it has happened, so I don't make it easy in case it happens again.

Locking up your weapon when you are not home is not protecting the criminal, it's protecting everyone else.

I disagree -- it is in my control as it is in my house and my house is in my control, whether or not I am present. Were that not the case I would not have to carry liability insurance. I could tell the judge, "Hey, I wasn't home when the kid locked himself in the abandoned fridge" and everything would be okay.

I don't leave cash or guns on my kitchen table. "... a place for everything..."

buffa98 12-28-2012 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidmash (Post 3072898)
Cars are not guns and guns are not cars. Different rules apply. Not sure why people insist on treating them as equals.

Then why do people(not you specifically) keep saying we have to register cars and not guns? I am only bringing up the fact that some people WON'T separate the two.

cmbdiesel 12-29-2012 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 3074096)
I disagree -- it is in my control as it is in my house and my house is in my control, whether or not I am present. Were that not the case I would not have to carry liability insurance. I could tell the judge, "Hey, I wasn't home when the kid locked himself in the abandoned fridge" and everything would be okay.

I don't leave cash or guns on my kitchen table. "... a place for everything..."

I can see your point, but if you are held liable for the abandoned fridge, do you not imagine that people will want to hold you responsible for crimes committed with your stolen guns?

There are already insurance companies that will either not insure, or raise the premiums to insure homeowners with guns.

cmbdiesel 12-29-2012 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buffa98 (Post 3074138)
Then why do people(not you specifically) keep saying we have to register cars and not guns? I am only bringing up the fact that some people WON'T separate the two.

I believe David is in favor or registering guns....

Cars are the gun freaks favorite strawman.... look at how many people they kill.... they should be banned.
But, that argument cuts both ways, as cars are registered and regulated in ways that guns are not. It's a piss poor argument, and has done nothing to further the cause of the gun owners.
How about periodic gun inspections? Just like a car? Bring it in and show that it remains in your possession, is in good working order, and has not had any illegal modifications??

jplinville 12-29-2012 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmbdiesel (Post 3074223)
I believe David is in favor or registering guns....

Cars are the gun freaks favorite strawman.... look at how many people they kill.... they should be banned.
But, that argument cuts both ways, as cars are registered and regulated in ways that guns are not. It's a piss poor argument, and has done nothing to further the cause of the gun owners.
How about periodic gun inspections? Just like a car? Bring it in and show that it remains in your possession, is in good working order, and has not had any illegal modifications??

Illegal modifications of a vehicle means you cannot operate it on public roads...would the same go for firearms?

Dubyagee 12-29-2012 08:46 AM

Handguns kill less people than fully automatic abortion clinics. Hows that for a strawman?


iPhone 4

Blue300SD 12-29-2012 09:31 AM

Funny, when people kill people its usually because of a mental health issue.
Except when they do it with a gun.
Then it becomes a constitutional issue.

I think murder is murder no matter what weapon is used.
Guns, knives, sporks, dont kill people.
Mentally ill people do.

Maybe the answer lies in mental health care, and not constitutional law ?
And keeping sporks out of the hands of the criminally insane !

Skippy 12-29-2012 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue300SD (Post 3074279)
Funny, when people kill people its usually because of a mental health issue.
Except when they do it with a gun.
Then it becomes a constitutional issue.

Not always. The mass murders are generally mental illness related, but in "normal" murders, arguments, drug deals, and robberies are popular circumstances. Read here:

FBI — Expanded Homicide Data Table 10

Quote:

I think murder is murder no matter what weapon is used.
Guns, knives, sporks, dont kill people.
Mentally ill people do.
I agree with you about murder being murder, however you don't have to be mentally ill to commit it.

Quote:

Maybe the answer lies in mental health care, and not constitutional law ?
And keeping sporks out of the hands of the criminally insane !
Given the number of crazy people I encounter on a regular basis, I think better access to mental health resources would probably be a good thing. And everyone knows no good can come from sporks.

More interesting reading here:

FBI — Expanded Homicide Data Table 8

FBI — Murder

Botnst 12-29-2012 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmbdiesel (Post 3074222)
I can see your point, but if you are held liable for the abandoned fridge, do you not imagine that people will want to hold you responsible for crimes committed with your stolen guns?

There are already insurance companies that will either not insure, or raise the premiums to insure homeowners with guns.

Fridges have low value as a tool of self-defense.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website