Originally Posted by Botnst

They are supposed to always be under ATC. Ask Iran about that.

Where I work we have an exemption that allows us to fly UAS in some particular areas that have low traffic density and high scientific remote sensing applicability. We have had no problems. I have not flown one nor have I been involved in a project that involved one.

My perspective is probably terribly skewed by the mission that I usually fly -- which is so far out of mainstream aviation that it results in a horrible bias, no question. We fly at about 120-150 ft from Sabine Pass to the Rigolets in a C185 amphib. I fly with one of 2 pilots, both of whom are amazing in their ability to totally focus on their job. Both of us keep a constant watch for power lines, towers and helicopters. And vultures and pelicans... But shyte happens awfully quick at 150 ft. The idea of some petunia-brained operator flying the UAS in my airspace is just scarey. It's bad enough that PHI pilots think they're god in an eggbeater. We usually see helicopters and evade before they spot us. I don't know what freqs they monitor but it's harder'n hell to talk to them. Imagine Petunia brain trying to talk while flying his UAS. OMG.

Maybe somebody could sing me a couple of verses of "John Henry" adapted to UAS vs manned aircraft....

Originally Posted by MS Fowler

Cynicism runs high.
Is it possible that his original intent was exactly as he stated?
Is it also possible that since he did the filibuster, and the press covered it, and they are now suggesting it made him a candidate, that he now seizes that opportunity? Would it be correct to take advantage of that opportunity? Are you able to see into his heart and mind and know his original motive?

So what to any of this? McCain's rebuke may have been the best thing to happen to conservatism in this country in a long time. Time for McCain to go quietly into retirement.