tbomachines |
07-23-2013 10:26 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jooseppi Luna
(Post 3181061)
What did you not like about it? The car strikes me as eminently useful, reliable, and cheap to own.
I think it does, but all else hasn't failed yet, so I haven't read the instructions!
|
Alternator cut out time after time even after checking everything downstream, bits and pieces would come loose and fell off the interior, wiring issues, wood grain was impossible to keep clean ("grain"), so isolated from the road you wouldn't even know you're moving until you get sick from the somewhat-insulated bounciness, crappy mileage, not even remotely powerful nor fun to drive. It was an exercise in mediocrity. It was also immensely ugly, an area in which it excelled and probably didn't play in my brother's favor in college. Useful, reliable, and cheap to own are all things that other cars do better nowadays IMO.
Being handed one for free changes things a lot, but I wouldn't go out and buy one unless someone was on a hard budget and looking strictly for cheap and reliable (and lets be honest a lot of people are looking for that). I can understand the draw but hope I don't have to in the future. Grandpa clearly thought differently with his collection though. My first regular car (when I was 16, not the first I bought) was an '89 Celebrity wagon from the same collection when he passed. Great for hauling my drums from venue to venue but awful at everything else. We sold it after 5k of our ownership when the coils went at the same time as the fuel pump and ECU...to a guy who used it as a doghouse. He was meticulous with maintenance too, being a mechanical engineer and an all-things proper DIY guy.
|