Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-25-2013, 10:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
NSA spying and the Amash Amendment. Traitors: 217 Good people: 205

The Amash Amendment would have defunded widespread NSA domestic surveillance, except for people already under suspicion. It failed in the House last night, but the vote was damned close (heartening in a way). 205 honest legislators to 217 traitors. Here's the roll call. When House elections come around, remember this list well and vote accordingly...

Amash Amendment On NSA Data Collection: House Roll Call Vote

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:04 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Do you REALLY believe that the bozo's in DC can defund ANYTHING. They are spending OUR money like a teenage girl with Daddy's credit card to buy votes for themselves. They don't GAS about the people of this country. NONE OF THEM DO!
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Do you REALLY believe that the bozo's in DC can defund ANYTHING. They are spending OUR money like a teenage girl with Daddy's credit card to buy votes for themselves. They don't GAS about the people of this country. NONE OF THEM DO!
Assuming it were passed, I'm sure that the NSA could have drawn funds from "black sources", but if the activity was specifically unauthorized by Congress, it would have made it more clear that the activity was illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
The GOP sided with Obama and Nancy Pelosi sided with the GOP. Go figure.

"Traitor" seems a bit strong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:10 AM
waterboarding w/medmech
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coming to your hometown
Posts: 7,987
I'll go with traitor. what else would you call a representative of the people who betrays them?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
"Traitor" seems a bit strong.
The enemies of the US want it destroyed from within, for us to go mindless with fear and vote the freedoms that make this country great away. Enabling this to actually happen ("giving them aid") is treason in my book.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:21 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Txjake View Post
I'll go with traitor. what else would you call a representative of the people who betrays them?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:24 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
The enemies of the US want it destroyed from within, for us to go mindless with fear and vote the freedoms that make this country great away. Enabling this to actually happen ("giving them aid") is treason in my book.

If you believe that, you need to stop and take a hard look at the new US. It is now FILLED with NUMEROUS traitorous goings on. Of course, the average Joe doesn't know it. One reason is that the corrupt and biased news media consuming news time with George Zimmerman and Baby King Bull Shlt news instead of honestly reporting the important facts of what is going on in our rapidly decaying America.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-25-2013, 11:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
The enemies of the US want it destroyed from within, for us to go mindless with fear and vote the freedoms that make this country great away. Enabling this to actually happen ("giving them aid") is treason in my book.
If our only choices were the Amash Amendment or going mindless with fear, then I would agree with you. I'm pretty sure there are other ways to skin this cat. Security and liberty are often at odds. That our national security agencies are making some false steps in this time of great change should be no surprise. I don't know the answer, but the Amash Amendment looks like an attempt to do brain surgery with a chain saw. Just because someone prefers a different approach does not mean he or she is a traitor, IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
If our only choices were the Amash Amendment or going mindless with fear, then I would agree with you. I'm pretty sure there are other ways to skin this cat. Security and liberty are often at odds. That our national security agencies are making some false steps in this time of great change should be no surprise. I don't know the answer, but the Amash Amendment looks like an attempt to do brain surgery with a chain saw. Just because someone prefers a different approach does not mean he or she is a traitor, IMHO.
No: gathering 99% of phone network users' personal information and treating everyone in the US as if they were under suspicion is doing brain surgery with a chain saw. The data should stay with the individual companies unless an item is specifically requested, and there should be strict time limits for the companies keeping the data if it has NOT been requested. The former is what the Amash Amendment would have done.

Americans are generally mindless with fear. Look at the number of guns we own (to supposedly protect against crime), the majority's blind acceptance of PATRIOT Act, torture, and invasion of Iraq, our Draconian sentencing laws as compared to other countries.

Violating long-standing liberties because of ONE incident 12 years ago where one-tenth the number of people who die in traffic every year perished is frankly retarded. Times are NOT more dangerous than they were 50 or even 100 years ago. Just because we now have the technical capability to monitor everything and archive a crapload of data in one place doesn't mean we should.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
That is a strong argument, but those who disagree with you also want to protect the country. They may be misguided, but they are not traitors.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
That is a strong argument, but those who disagree with you also want to protect the country. They may be misguided, but they are not traitors.
That's like saying that a serial killer with a legitimate gripe is only misguided, and not a criminal. One can be both.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
That's like saying that a serial killer with a legitimate gripe is only misguided, and not a criminal. One can be both.
That's a weak analogy. What do you mean by "legitimate gripe"? I'm having a hard time analogizing a difference of opinion on national security with being a serial killer.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-25-2013, 12:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Central Kentucky
Posts: 1,069
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

That is the plain text. From, if you will, the master rulebook for this country. A large bunch of us consider the spying by the NSA to be a violation of that rule. Either you uphold the constitution or you do not. Most people would consider me to be a conservative, from the right-hand side of the aisle. Yet, I still consider the most of Patriot Act and the actions it has spawned to be illegal under the constitution. Yes, I think people who permit it are traitors. Not by intent per se, but by misguided (at best) actions. Some, I suspect, really are flat out for all kinds of spying on the citizens and don't care one bit where the constitution permits it or not.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-25-2013, 01:02 PM
aklim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Location: Greenfield WI, USA
Posts: 8,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
No: gathering 99% of phone network users' personal information and treating everyone in the US as if they were under suspicion is doing brain surgery with a chain saw. The data should stay with the individual companies unless an item is specifically requested, and there should be strict time limits for the companies keeping the data if it has NOT been requested. The former is what the Amash Amendment would have done.

Americans are generally mindless with fear. Look at the number of guns we own (to supposedly protect against crime), the majority's blind acceptance of PATRIOT Act, torture, and invasion of Iraq, our Draconian sentencing laws as compared to other countries.

Violating long-standing liberties because of ONE incident 12 years ago where one-tenth the number of people who die in traffic every year perished is frankly retarded. Times are NOT more dangerous than they were 50 or even 100 years ago. Just because we now have the technical capability to monitor everything and archive a crapload of data in one place doesn't mean we should.
A very well put statement if it didn't come from the guy who feels that rules should be enforced as one feels necessary or ignored when it is, in their opinion, not good. Now suddenly, you feel that by ignoring the rules and laws, it is traitorous because they felt it was necessary and you don't like it. Principles can be inconvenient, at times, no?

__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke
99 E300 Turbodiesel
91 Vette with 383 motor
05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI
06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red
03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow
04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler
11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page