Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquaticedge
(Post 3195991)
I'll also note, those lenses they used are about 2500-4500.00 and a full set runs about 25K. but they are really stunning pictures... I wish I could do it. the moving tripod is really nice, it's somewhat reasonable at about 600.00
|
The more spendy lenses are typically made for more spendy cameras. A pricer lens will 1) be faster (have a bigger max aperture); 2) often produce less vignetting at max aperture; 3) be longer lenses - that is, provide more magnifying power; and most importantly, be serious camera bling.
You can get a perfectly workable name-brand telephoto lens up to about 300 MM for a couple of hundred $$. These are great things to buy used at pawn or used camera shops.
You can mostly eliminate vignetting problems by using F8 or F11 so that the middle portion of the lens is used. Most vignetting and other aberrations occur at the outside part of the glass used in lenses. The downside of stopping down the lens is that it requires a longer exposure or higher ISO. If you crank the ISO up, you introduce noise, and of course, you need a good tripod and astronomical mount to track star motion without blurring.
The thread I posted will provide nearly everything you or anyone needs to produce amazing results.
|