Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2013, 04:55 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,416
Federal Court Rules Videotaping Police Is A First Amendment Right

Yes, you have the constitutional right, despite what individual officers say or think...

Supreme Court Upholds Legality of Videotaping Police » Courtroom Strategy by Attorney Oscar Michelen

.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2013, 05:09 PM
Can't Know's Avatar
Registered Slacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 733
Quote:
It is now technically legal to record on-duty police officers in every state in the country.
Well, no, not really.

The guy may be an attorney, but he's not a constitutional attorney.

According to his article, two circuit courts (first and seventh) have ruled that the right to free speech encompasses audio/video recording of police. The SCT denied cert on an appeal out of the seventh circuit.

That means that in the states covered by those rulings (Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Wisconsin), it is legal to record on-duty police officers.

Regardless of his use of the word "technically", the fact that the SCT denied cert on one of the cases doesn't mean it's the law everywhere in the US. Denial of cert has no legal effect whatsoever. It's the same thing as if no appeal had been submitted.

His underlying point (that you may still be arrested and harassed for doing so) is a valid one, though, and it's a sad commentary that cops don't like being taped enough to arrest someone for it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2013, 05:14 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,416
Hmm

Thank you.
I would like to understand more on how this shakes out nationally.

Having been harassed several times, it is personally interesting.

.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2013, 05:14 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texafornia
Posts: 5,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can't Know View Post
Well, no, not really.

The guy may be an attorney, but he's not a constitutional attorney.

According to his article, two circuit courts (first and seventh) have ruled that the right to free speech encompasses audio/video recording of police. The SCT denied cert on an appeal out of the seventh circuit.

That means that in the states covered by those rulings (Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Wisconsin), it is legal to record on-duty police officers.

Regardless of his use of the word "technically", the fact that the SCT denied cert on one of the cases doesn't mean it's the law everywhere in the US. Denial of cert has no legal effect whatsoever. It's the same thing as if no appeal had been submitted.

His underlying point (that you may still be arrested and harassed for doing so) is a valid one, though, and it's a sad commentary that cops don't like being taped enough to arrest someone for it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^6
all lame states anyhow.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2013, 07:46 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by whunter View Post
Yes, you have the constitutional right, despite what individual officers say or think...

Supreme Court Upholds Legality of Videotaping Police » Courtroom Strategy by Attorney Oscar Michelen

.
Good ruling.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-20-2013, 07:48 PM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by whunter View Post
Thank you.
I would like to understand more on how this shakes out nationally.

Having been harassed several times, it is personally interesting.

.
Hard to believe that a good bloke like you Roy would be harassed by the PD.
Maybe they have lowered their standards way too much on who they hire.

I have a cheap in car cam. the couple of times that I have been randomly stopped, i turn it so that it films where I will be standing on the foot path. if asked about it, I would just say it is always filming.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-20-2013, 07:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Citizen got the crap beaten out of him by cops in Denver a couple of years ago for filming them arresting someone else.

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/81072399/
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:25 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
If you are videotaping in a big city with a lot of people witnessing it or on a busy road or highway, it may not be a problem. Try videotaping the cops out on a country rural road with nobody else around and they might give you a Rodney King style beat down.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:37 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry View Post
Citizen got the crap beaten out of him by cops in Denver a couple of years ago for filming them arresting someone else.

Denver Cops Beat Another Man - Video
The man with the video should have waited for the cops to LEAVE, then make his offer of being willing to appear in court on behalf of the ticketed motorist. That way, he would have been out of ear shot of the cops and would not have been subjected to a Rodney King style beating.

In addition, if the motorist could locate any other witnesses to the traffic stop that might be willing to appear in court, better yet.

Some cops run HOT as in HOT tempered and will snap at a moment's notice. This man is very fortunate that they didn't shoot him.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-20-2013, 09:53 PM
Mölyapina's Avatar
User title not in use
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Chelmsford, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by panZZer View Post
all lame states anyhow.
Hey now .
__________________
"Senior Luna, your sense of humor is still loco... but we love it, anyway." -rickymay ____ "Your sense of humor is still loco... " -MBeige ____ "Señor Luna, your sense of humor is quite järjetön" -Delibes

1982 300SD -- 211k, Texas car, tranny issues ____ 1979 240D 4-speed 234k -- turbo and tuned IP, third world taxi hot rod

2 Samuel 12:13: "David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord.” And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die."
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-21-2013, 08:45 AM
link's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 835
Good to know. Thanks for the post.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-22-2013, 09:01 PM
macdoe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 759
Should be legal everywhere. Does Canada have this law too? Is there some way of tying taxpayor dollars to their service for the city you live in as a checks and balance system, to offer accountability, for what taxpayor dollars are being spent on in each area of police work. Is that a police commision?

Could that eliminate corruption.

The city is taping YOU with your taxpayor dollars, red light and in car cameras..... How do television shows like cops exist. If one policeman is taped, why do they think they can choose which policeman is taped? The same principle should be applied.

Do they (the police) subject themselves to a certain amount of expected public scrutiny, just as they would accept perceived heroizm, when they sign on as a police officer in the first place. I think when you sign on as a police officer then it is implied consent that we may be recording them, as well, especially now that they are recording us.

They may be recording you on a voice recorder and justify it in order to "help them with their paperwork" How do we know...guess they don't need to justify it since they already have been doing this awhile.

Should we be allowed equal opportunity to record them if we are allowed the right to an impartial trial.

Should'nt a police officer if he is using these tactics against you expect you could be using the same thing on your behalf....should the need arise.

Why if he is following the law of good conduct as a policeman need to be fearull or object to being recorded in their job in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-23-2013, 07:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Alexandria, Virginia
Posts: 5,480
Some states are very aggressive towards citizens videotaping cops.
A few years ago, Maryland state police stopped a helmet-cam wearing motorcyclist for reckless driving. Later, when the video of the plainclothes officer with his gun drawn hit YouTube, they charged the biker with felony wiretapping, with a possible 16 year sentence!
The charge was dropped after the story hit the news-media.

Happy Motoring, Mark
__________________
DrDKW
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-23-2013, 05:17 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
In the "firearm community" (quoted because it's a stupid media-invented term), people have been fighting the police about this for awhile. It's amazing just how ill-informed the police generally are. They seem to thrive on making up laws as they go, such as it being illegal to open carry a firearm when you have a CC license or permit. This debate has happened many times in many different areas of PA. Video tapes of it, and of cops being general douche bags about it have popped up all over the internet.

I love it!!
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-23-2013, 05:25 PM
kmaysob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: mesa az
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
In the "firearm community" (quoted because it's a stupid media-invented term), people have been fighting the police about this for awhile. It's amazing just how ill-informed the police generally are. They seem to thrive on making up laws as they go, such as it being illegal to open carry a firearm when you have a CC license or permit. This debate has happened many times in many different areas of PA. Video tapes of it, and of cops being general douche bags about it have popped up all over the internet.

I love it!!
i love the "we stopped you because people have called us in fear due to the pistol on your side".

__________________
have no worries.....President Obama swears "If you like your gun, you can keep it
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page