Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-02-2013, 09:19 PM
ILUVMILS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,067
The engineer is gonna' be in deep s**t. Eighty two MPH? He claims the brakes failed. We'll see.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-02-2013, 09:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVMILS View Post
The engineer is gonna' be in deep s**t. Eighty two MPH? He claims the brakes failed. We'll see.
80 mph isn't unusual for trains, but obviously he should have braked for the curve earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-02-2013, 09:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Track had 70mph limit from what I heard.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-03-2013, 07:44 AM
Admiral-Third World Fleet
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,069
Oddly enough, we couldn't find anything better on TV last night ( and we DON'T have cable etc) so we watched an old flick "Falling in Love " with DeNiro/Streep..

Falling in Love (1984) - IMDb

and there is a scene in the movie when the train goes around THAT fateful curve...and it doesn't seem to be going 35 to me....spooky
__________________
80 300SD (129k mi) 82 240D stick (193k mi)77 240D auto - stick to be (153k mi) 85 380SL (145k mi) 89 BMW 535i 82 Diesel Rabbit Pickup (374k mi) 91 Jetta IDI Diesel (155k mi) 81 VW Rabbit Convertible Diesel 70 Triumph Spitfire Mk III (63kmi)66 Triumph TR4a IRS (90k mi)67 Ford F-100 (??)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-03-2013, 08:08 AM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Very sad. Have a number and friends and family members who commute that way during the week.

Sure sounds like the engineer dropped the ball big time.
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-03-2013, 08:18 AM
elchivito's Avatar
ĦAy Jodido!
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rancho Disparates
Posts: 4,075
speeding. I am SHOCKED!
brakes failed AFTER the 9 successful stops the train had already made. uh huh
__________________
You're a daisy if you do.
__________________________________
84 Euro 240D 4spd. 220.5k sold
04 Honda Element AWD
1985 F150 XLT 4x4, 351W with 270k miles, hay hauler
1997 Suzuki Sidekick 4x4
1993 Toyota 4wd Pickup 226K and counting
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-03-2013, 08:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerry View Post
Not disputing the safety of trains, just that simple technology could make them safer.
If only we could get RID of some other antiquated safety standards while we're at it. The US has idiotically high crash strength standards for new rail cars, which is why we can't use a lot of more efficient and more stable overseas rail equipment, and why upgrading railcars in the US is 5x as expensive as everywhere else.

Anyway, Metro North is safe. One instance of passenger death. In. 30. Years. Try that with a bus line, a road, or even most airlines. Fix the problem if one exists, lock up the engineer if he's at fault, move on.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-03-2013, 10:10 AM
dynalow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,599
That guy better lawyer up. NOW!!

Heard on Morning Joe that they were planning to install some sort of fail safe braking mechanisms....in a couple of years.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-03-2013, 10:19 AM
A Talent for Obfuscation
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In the Deep State
Posts: 17,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVMILS View Post
The engineer is gonna' be in deep s**t. Eighty two MPH? He claims the brakes failed. We'll see.
Well, he applied the brakes five seconds before entering the curve, with the apparent hope of reducing his speed by 52 mph within those five seconds. Doable in something like a Ferrari California, so by those standards, the brakes did indeed fail...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-03-2013, 11:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by dynalow View Post
Heard on Morning Joe that they were planning to install some sort of fail safe braking mechanisms....in a couple of years.
The later the better, hopefully. I'd rather see spending on more public transit and better-maintained tracks than braking mechanisms designed for a one-in-a-billion event (apparently cost of positive train control rollout is something like $20-25 BILLION nationwide). Baby steps.

Bet more accidents are caused by maintenance (or lack thereof) than engineer error. Not to mention level crossings, which should be eliminated at busy roads.

Again: other than people being hit by trains, there has been ONE fatal Metro North accident in its 30-year history. I'd say that was a pretty damn good safety record. Why freak out about a safety problem when none exists?

Last edited by spdrun; 12-03-2013 at 11:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-03-2013, 11:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by spdrun View Post
Again: other than people being hit by trains, there has been ONE fatal Metro North accident in its 30-year history. I'd say that was a pretty damn good safety record. Why freak out about a safety problem when none exists?
Because we're Americans! It's what we do. We think of the children. Why do you hate America so much?

Won't somebody think of the children!?

MV
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-03-2013, 04:15 PM
Redefining normal daily
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 445
Ooops.

"I was in a daze"
__________________
1961 220b: first project car - sold.
2000 CLK 430: first modern Benz - sold.
2001 CLK 55: OMG the torque!!! - sold
1972 280SE 4.5: Baby Gustav
1991 300TE 4Matic: Gretel the Snow Bunny - sold
1978 300SD: Katz the Free Man - given away
1980 Redhead: Darling Wife
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-03-2013, 06:09 PM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 13,667
Back in the day before reliable pocket watches train wrecks were big news, happened often and typically resulted in fatalities. Then too you had to deal with the exploding boilers on occasion.

Riding the train was a lot more exciting back then.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-03-2013, 06:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by engatwork View Post
Back in the day before reliable pocket watches train wrecks were big news, happened often and typically resulted in fatalities. Then too you had to deal with the exploding boilers on occasion.

Riding the train was a lot more exciting back then.


Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-03-2013, 06:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 18,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by engatwork View Post
Back in the day before reliable pocket watches train wrecks were big news, happened often and typically resulted in fatalities. Then too you had to deal with the exploding boilers on occasion.

Riding the train was a lot more exciting back then.

One of the reasons we have uniform time zones now as opposed to local solar time.

__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08
1985 300TD 185k+
1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03
1985 409d 65k--sold 06
1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car
1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11
1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper
1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4
1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page