Non-disparagement clause
 

CNN

Never eve heard about a clause like this but it's not surprising. I would think that since the clause was added after the purchase the case should be a slam dunk. I love the blow back that is happening against Kleargear.com.

Link not complete/not working...

OK, fixed it...

http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/02/tech/couple-fined-for-negative-review/index.html

If the items were never delivered as required by the contract, wouldn't Kleargear be in breach, voiding the rest of the contract?

That would probably put Kleargear in breach, but I think you would have to see the contract to know whether other parts of the contract survive.

The non-disparagement language in that case seems like it should fail for lack of consideration since it was added after the deal was struck.

It is not disparaging if they are generally regarded as scum. They can pretend but you are not obligated to share their delusions.

All publicity is good publicity?

http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/yhst-.../notice-fr.jpg

Very strange. You'd think you'd get some sort of reason why your shipment never went out, before PayPay decided that the transaction was open long enough.

Sure seems like a $h!ttY policy!

somebody needs to take a bat to the clowns at Kleargear

Their website is sketchy to say the least.