Yea there is supposed to be three this time, a certain sign of how its fracturing now,, the regular faction, the tea partiers and who else,, the al qaeda branch of the gop, mad dogs/ mike rodgers gang?

Anybody give a shyte what President Obama or the Three Dwarves say? Anybody?

Bueller?

I don't.

It is going to be interesting to see how he does his "executive" order deal to become our first third term prez.

__________________
Jim

Well hmm,, W was soooo good about funding scientific research instead of BS wars etc, seems like it would be worth it to pay a democratic pres some mind. juuuuust sayin.

So do you care more what the orange dude always says--pure bull sheet...... ?

Can't say I'm in love with either of the two arseclowns that have been in the Oval Orifice since 2001.

I have not given this much thought. Obama is going to do all he can to move his agenda forward and the Republicans have already said that no matter what he comes up with they will oppose it. No matter what, the Republicans have said Obama will hit their brick wall.

So I expect Obama to do all he can without their help. If they want to oppose him for issuing executive orders then it is the same as them opposing him for anything else he does. The Constitution provides a way for the president to do some things when Congress will not go along, so, given that the Republicans have already said they are going to do all they can to oppose anything and everything why would he not use any power he has to do the same to them?

The Speaker has already said he intends for the Republicans to do nothing to move the country forward this year. All the Republicans are going to do, according to the Speaker, is oppose everything and continue to cash their paychecks.

Pretty nice gig.

Ok, we got the "Bush's fault" think on record. That's always useful.

It is the constitutional prerogative, actually the intent, for the Congress to moderate the president. So they are doing their duty within constitutional limits.

Got anything else?

Yes, checks and balances. Glad you paid attention in civics class. I do not think the Constitutional intent was to stagnate government.

Got anything else?

__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.

Yeah, just one question for you:

Know the difference between "moderate" and "following a scorched earth policy as regards everything put in front of them and yet offering no viable alternatives"?

__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)

Something both sides have done quite well over the years. I believe this sort of thing gave birth to the Constitutionl Party, The Libertarian Party, etc., etc.

Looking forward to Nov. '14. Should be interesting.

__________________
Mike Murrell
1991 300-SEL - Model 126
M103 - SOHC
"Fräulein"

You do understand what the word, "checks" means?

Is it your suggestion that recalcitrance in Congress justifies the Executive to assume greater power than constitutionally authorized?

There was a speech?