PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/)
-   -   Bought a new daily driver (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/off-topic-discussion/372622-bought-new-daily-driver.html)

gatorblue92 10-16-2015 01:35 PM

Bought a new daily driver
 
It's not a Mercedes and it has twin turbos. It's also brand new and gets over 23 MPG on the highway on RUG. Any guesses on what it is :D

P.C. 10-16-2015 01:44 PM

Ford F150 with the 2.7 Ecoboost - which I would run on at least mid-premium.

gatorblue92 10-16-2015 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P.C. (Post 3529664)
Ford F150 with the 2.7 Ecoboost - which I would run on at least mid-premium.

Right on the first guess! According to all of the reports on the F150 forums it's fine on RUG unless you are towing.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...psoavnlzfv.jpg

MTI 10-16-2015 02:27 PM

Runs fine, or is the engine retarding the ignition at the expense of performance/mpg?

P.C. 10-16-2015 02:30 PM

Ok. I'm a little paranoid about turbo engines under load and their octane requirements, and run my 3.5 Ecoboost on 93 octane, which is maybe a little more than a bit of overkill.

Beautiful truck! Does it have the 2.7 heavy duty package?

KarTek 10-16-2015 02:31 PM

Nice! Great color too. I would totally get one of these if I was in the market for a truck again.

P.C. 10-16-2015 02:32 PM

There is some performance advantage available running on premium fuel, but it's not substantial. I think that you may increase horsepower on the Ecoboosts by high single-digits.

P.C. 10-16-2015 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gatorblue92 (Post 3529674)
Right on the first guess! According to all of the reports on the F150 forums it's fine on RUG unless you are towing.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...psoavnlzfv.jpg

The 2.7 is a very good performer. It's almost amazing that such a large truck can perform well with a powerplant offering less displacement than the base engine on a 1960 Falcon.

benhogan 10-16-2015 03:40 PM

is this the Body by Alcoa version?

gatorblue92 10-16-2015 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P.C. (Post 3529677)
Ok. I'm a little paranoid about turbo engines under load and their octane requirements, and run my 3.5 Ecoboost on 93 octane, which is maybe a little more than a bit of overkill.

Beautiful truck! Does it have the 2.7 heavy duty package?

No its just the regular package. I was planning on getting the 5.0 but after driving both the 3.5 and the 2.7 I was hooked on the EcoBoost. I couldn't justify the nearly $2000 premium on the 3.5 since I'm not doing any heavy towing aside from the occasional w123/w124 parts car :eek: I have wanted a full size truck for 10 years now and I decided it was finally time.

I sold the 400E so the 300TE and 240D are now going to be garage queens.

gatorblue92 10-16-2015 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benhogan (Post 3529713)
is this the Body by Alcoa version?

LOL yes it is.

Mölyapina 10-16-2015 05:22 PM

The father of a friend of mine recently got one of these, and boy, is it nice! Quiet, comfy, and nice and high off the road... I really loved it. So much more refined than our Corolla :P.

Does the aluminum bodt mean no rusty tailgates or cab corners? I'm really excited about the prospect one of one of these 10-15 years from now...

super SEC 10-16-2015 05:54 PM

Really nice truck, congrats.

carl177 10-16-2015 08:07 PM

Bought a new daily driver
 
Very nice truck. Congratulations.


cm

Robert W. Roe 10-16-2015 08:11 PM

Nice truck. I would probably run at least 89 octane or at least give it an occasional treat of a few gallons of premium.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website