|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ML 500 or Range Rover 4.4
If you had the choice of driving either an 2003 ML 500 or a 2003 Range Rover 4.4 for a long weekend, which would you choose and why?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Range Rover....
I can't think of anything that the ML does that the Range-Rover doesn't do better.... Too bad over here the Range Rovers are played out already, all you see is Cayenne's and Tuaregs..... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
The interior of the Range Rover is absolutely incredible. Range Rover hands down. Now if it was an ML 55, then I would be stumpted
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Take the ML . The RR looks like a box on wheels . Also my next door neighbor who has one says that they break down alot because of bad engineering and the time and cost in the shop is not worth it .
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
One thing about owning a real expensive SUV , are you really going to jump ditches in it ? MB , BMW , LEXUS , ACURA , INFINITY , ESCALADE , RANGE ROVER etc . Most of the people I see driving them don`t . More than anything they`re status symbols .
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
the range rover is very nice, unique, and a seriously good looking truck.
I like them. If I had to choose, it would be tough, because the mercedes is also a nice truck too. But the Range Rover to me is like the Rolls Royce of trucks, great looking, well made, not too reliable unless maintained properly, but thats how a rolls is anyway. I would choose the range rover if I had never driven one before, otherwise I would choose the ml if I hadn't driven that but had driven the rover. Either way you can't go wrong. Alon
__________________
'92 300CE - Sold 2004 C240 - 744 - C7 Wheels - Android Radio 2002 C320 - 816 - Sport Wagon |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
hehe mark, the comment about them being boxes on wheels is so true. My brother has a 93 range rover, and his mechanic actually told him... "It's a box on wheels, don't drive it like a race car..."
But my brother doesn't listen to him, and has spent over $15k on the car in 3 years maintaining it. in 2.5 years with my benz, I have no spent more than $4000 maintaining it, and a big chunk of that was rebuilding the tranny because the previous owner of my car had not changed the tranny fluid at all. I just had my tranny fluid replaced after 25k miles, and it still looked brand new. My mech was wondering why I even bothered to have it changed, but he didn't charge me for the change anyway, he only commented how the fluid looked as new. Gotta love benzes. Alon
__________________
'92 300CE - Sold 2004 C240 - 744 - C7 Wheels - Android Radio 2002 C320 - 816 - Sport Wagon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I choose neither because they are both completely pointless vehicles. The only reason for wanting one is the high seating position.
beaten up Land-Rover, or G-wagen, yes i'd gladly accept If you're going to do something, do it properly :p
__________________
190E's: 2.5-16v 1990 90,000m Astral Silver 2.0E 8v 1986 107,000m Black 2nd owner http://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall.jpghttp://www.maylane.demon.co.uk/190esmall2.jpg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Neither, get a G500! But if that cant happen then you should definately get the Rover.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
They are good!
I had a Range Rover when I was working on a project in Brazil. It never let me down and always made it through the mud without a problem. It was alos very easy to work on in the middle of the jungle.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - Robert A. Zimmerman |
Bookmarks |
|
|