Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-12-2006, 11:15 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth
one of the biggest things that bothers me about iraq is that the war is being prosecuted by so many national guard units and reservists. many are back over there on their third tours. this is so unfair. their lives are being ruined. divorces are running at very high rates.

if the war is so important our leaders should ask for a draft so that these people who are supposed to be emergency back up can be replaced by regular army. this is not being done because imho our leaders dont want to pay the political price for a more fair system.

so these folks who signed on because they needed a side job with benefits are stuck over there doing a police action with about 1/3 the number of troops that were recommended by experienced military leaders. (who said this was what was needed in the first place.)...
tom w
I have never heard of anybody in my lifetime who didn't get the enlistment terms in writing and repeatedly read to them before the signed and held up their right hand. It has probably happened a few times, but I haven't heard of it. You sign-up and take the money and take the bennies, you better be prepared for the risks because it is not your choice when to go or for what reason.

It is a hardship for some, and especially for those with families I have some sympathy. But keep in mind that they didn't squeal when things were easy.

What do you think of the article I posted immediately preceding your post? It's a cultural view of violence that I found informative.

B

  #32  
Old 07-13-2006, 02:00 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 34,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by TX76513
I had the same question(s). So I asked my daughter who is currently in Bagsdaddy (her word) for her candid views vs the media.

This is an excerpt of her e-mail:

Right now I am in no situation to be able to discuss my own personal thoughts on this state of affairs. There is a lot going on over here, and the nine times out of ten the TV is right. What we see as not correct is the number of people that are wounded or injured otherwise. I am rechecking everyday my sanity on
joining the military and still have not come up with a good enough
justification for this place. If I remember correctly I served my four years last April. We are fighting for our country right? We can't even keep the war with in our company to a minimum how the heck are we suppose to win the war with this country. We are a NG unit we have old hand-me-down for uniforms/equip - most of us have never been trained with some of the weapons/equip we are using........We have though, moved across the street from our present location. We have permanent tents with air/heat, we are able to shower everyday, hot showers,and we have some semi normal bathrooms. Here is the kicker – they brought over some young civilians (contractor) to build these new facilities (deluxe tents). They are making $306 a day and they live in RV’s that travel from camp to camp. Real moral booster................... In the mornings I get up and do PT. Ya, PT, have you ever heard of PT in a war zone....oh, that's right the war's over right? That's why soldiers die every day!! My body, mind and soul is tired, and not sure how I will ever adapt to normal living when I return. We have changed so much over here, some good, some bad. I fight
the urge to not be that person that I am turning into but can't beat it anymore. I just want to come home.....................


Just sharing
Whoa, that is sobering. Reminds me a bit of 60 Minutes piece about a young lady who was stationed at one of the lesser known prisons in Iraq. I think they ran it in '03 or '04. I didn't find this site til after this thread was all but buried, so I hadn't seen this one before.

Sure hope it turned out well.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
  #33  
Old 07-13-2006, 02:05 AM
cmac2012's Avatar
Renaissances Dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 34,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
The fraud of primitive authenticity
By Spengler

Two billion war deaths would have occurred in the 20th century if modern societies suffered the same casualty rate as primitive peoples, according to anthropologist Lawrence H Keeley, who calculates that two-thirds of them were at war continuously, typically losing half of a percent of its population to war each year. [1]
Interesting piece. I'll have to chew on it for awhile. When he speaks of modern romantasizing (sp) of primitive peoples, he has a good point -- OTOH -- "primitive people" spans a huge stretch of time. The Amer.Inds. brutalized each other at times, at other times had elaborate trading get togethers. The various Sioux nations strike me as interesting, and the Nez Perc as well. You no doubt know that Lewis and Clark and co. would have done a lot worse w/o the help of the Nez Perc.

WW2 killed a much smaller proportion of the population than in early times but devastated much more of the infrastrtucture I would imagine -- course, infrastructure was limitied way back when.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
  #34  
Old 07-13-2006, 06:58 AM
Carleton Hughes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,611
People are primitive.

Especially when the stench of spirituality is invoked....


http://www.slick.com/dmd/dancemonkeysdance.htm
__________________
  #35  
Old 07-13-2006, 08:22 AM
TX76513's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brandon, Mississippi
Posts: 5,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmac2012
Whoa, that is sobering. Reminds me a bit of 60 Minutes piece about a young lady who was stationed at one of the lesser known prisons in Iraq. I think they ran it in '03 or '04. I didn't find this site til after this thread was all but buried, so I hadn't seen this one before.

Sure hope it turned out well.
That's an old post. More sobering is that last we ever heard from her was July 7th 2004:
__________________
BENZ THERE DONE THAThttp://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/...c/progress.gif
15 VW Passat TDI
00 E420
98 E300 DT
97 E420 Donor Car - NEED PARTS? PM ME!
97 S500
97 E300D
86 Holden Jackaroo Turbo D
86 300SDL
(o\|/o)

Last edited by TX76513; 07-13-2006 at 04:17 PM.
  #36  
Old 07-13-2006, 08:38 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
I have never heard of anybody in my lifetime who didn't get the enlistment terms in writing and repeatedly read to them before the signed and held up their right hand. It has probably happened a few times, but I haven't heard of it. You sign-up and take the money and take the bennies, you better be prepared for the risks because it is not your choice when to go or for what reason...
You can say that all you want, but there is no way that the members of the National Guard and Reserves signed up for what's going on in Iraq. I'm sure their deployment meets the literal terms of their enlistment agreements, but they had the right to expect that the President would act in good faith in deploying troops.
  #37  
Old 07-13-2006, 08:42 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
You can say that all you want, but there is no way that the members of the National Guard and Reserves signed up for what's going on in Iraq. I'm sure their deployment meets the literal terms of their enlistment agreements, but they had the right to expect that the President would act in good faith in deploying troops.
You can say what you want to but there is no way anybody signs up without full knowledge that they maybe ordered into combat and that they have no choice of where, when or why.

Everybody always expects the best of their leadership. As civilians we have the luxury, right and duty to second-guess the leadership. In the military it is exactly the opposite: You go to jail for questioning the leadership.

B
  #38  
Old 07-13-2006, 08:43 AM
MedMech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBZ12
Another Blackhawk down! How many more of our men and women are going to perish in the Middle East before something drastic isn't done to resolve this conflict? The body bags are increasing by the day and all I seem to get is a business as usual attitude from our government. At what point do we finish the job??? Just frustrated to hear about our military personnel having their hands basically tied.

Totally deep man...peace

Another Blackhawk Down? please explain that one I think there should be a law against jaw jacking and using the term Blackhawk Down.

Last edited by MedMech; 07-13-2006 at 09:03 AM.
  #39  
Old 07-13-2006, 09:29 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
You can say what you want to but there is no way anybody signs up without full knowledge that they maybe ordered into combat and that they have no choice of where, when or why...
Agreed. I never said any different. What I said was that the soldiers had a right to expect the President to act in good faith. You, apparently, believe that the President owes the soldiers no duty of good faith, which is a remarkable position, to say the least.
  #40  
Old 07-13-2006, 09:34 AM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
Agreed. I never said any different. What I said was that the soldiers had a right to expect the President to act in good faith. You, apparently, believe that the President owes the soldiers no duty of good faith, which is a remarkable position, to say the least.
I don't believe I said that, you might want to check.

I reject your premise and so therefore your conclusion is also unacceptible. But I also don't want to get bogged-down into one of those pointless, endless ping-pong games and for that reason I didn't address that particular issue.

Must...resist....

B
  #41  
Old 07-13-2006, 10:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
I don't believe I said that, you might want to check.

I reject your premise and so therefore your conclusion is also unacceptible. But I also don't want to get bogged-down into one of those pointless, endless ping-pong games and for that reason I didn't address that particular issue...
If you don't want to get into a "pointless" conversation, then you should be willing to admit the logical conclusion of your statements.

The unmistakable meaning of your replies to t walgamuth and me is that the President owes no duty of good faith to the soldiers. Under your reasoning, whether the President acts with good faith and fairness doesn't matter because the soldiers gave an oath of loyalty. IMHO, that is a twisted concept of loyalty. Far from excusing the President's bad faith, the soldiers' oath of loyalty is the source of the President's duty of good faith.

I assume that you reject the notion that W acted in bad faith, but that doesn't really matter. Under your logic, whether W acted in bad faith is irrelevant.
  #42  
Old 07-13-2006, 11:40 AM
Cabernet red, actually
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Willamette Valley, OR
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by TX76513
That's an old post. More sobering is that last we ever heard from her was July 7th 2004
That's really terrible.

My heart goes out and I wish you and your family the best.
__________________
Ralph

1985 300D Turbo, CA model
248,650 miles and counting...

Last edited by Maroon 300D; 07-13-2006 at 01:17 PM.
  #43  
Old 07-13-2006, 11:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
If you don't want to get into a "pointless" conversation, then you should be willing to admit the logical conclusion of your statements.

The unmistakable meaning of your replies to t walgamuth and me is that the President owes no duty of good faith to the soldiers. Under your reasoning, whether the President acts with good faith and fairness doesn't matter because the soldiers gave an oath of loyalty. IMHO, that is a twisted concept of loyalty. Far from excusing the President's bad faith, the soldiers' oath of loyalty is the source of the President's duty of good faith.

I assume that you reject the notion that W acted in bad faith, but that doesn't really matter. Under your logic, whether W acted in bad faith is irrelevant.

Guys (not just you D, but you know my limitations on quoting), a man just shared with us he lost his daughter in this thing. Can we just close this particular thread and piss at each other on another one out of respect?
  #44  
Old 07-13-2006, 12:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Doe
Guys (not just you D, but you know my limitations on quoting), a man just shared with us he lost his daughter in this thing. Can we just close this particular thread and piss at each other on another one out of respect?
Right you are. My mistake for jumping into a thread without reading the man's post.
  #45  
Old 07-13-2006, 12:32 PM
GottaDiesel's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,564
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by axlechassis
Over a 100 people die every day in alcohol related car accidents.
and that has been going on for 30 years.
Where is the media outrage? Something drastic needs to be done right.

Over 100 women die every day from breast cancer. That has been a known fact for many years.
Again where is the media outrage? Something drastic needs to be done about it right.

Does anyone see something out of proportion here.

I'm certainly not minimizing the loss of our brave soldiers in Iraq, but the media has lost perspective right now with thier lopsided reporting of what is going on in Iraq. The media is following their own agenda. If they were sincere in hteir concern about the loss of human life they would'nt be focusing on Iraq

MBZ12.... the media is trying to manipulate you so you do something drastic, like vote for Howard Dean next fall. That is the agenda. Dont get sucked into that vortex.

Yeah, only we're trying to do things to prevent Breast Cancer (and cure it) -- same for drunk driving.

*We* went TO Iraq (with no support from other nations) and started something that we clearly will not be able to finish. WE did it. A woman doesn't say, "Hey, honey, give me a vial of something bad and let's see if I can't get breast cancer."

The example you give is sick.

I'd love to hear what your feelings toward Howard Dean are based on? Sounds like you're a Bush lover... so I guess having a balanced budget and a strong nation aren't something you would support since you don't support Dean. He's not all talk -- he actually DID thing. What has Bush done??? (Except murder 2500+ soliders...) ?

Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page