|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
a moment of silence for the rotary engine
__________________
Jim |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Wankels. The way Popular Mechanics went on about them in the 60's, weren't they supposed to be the cure to all our reciprocating woes, while simultaneously solving hair loss and restoring virginity?
I had a Mazda rotary pickup in the 80's. The thing ran like a spotted-assed ape but only got about 10mpg. I'd had enough of it's 2qt/fillup oil consumption and swapped out the rotary for a 2800cc V6 out of a Mustang II. A sweet conversion, it dropped right in and bolted up to the driveshaft. Before pulling the rotary, I went out on a drive with the intention of blowing that Wankel to Kingdom come...only then I discovered that it had a rev limiter and audible warning that went off above 9000rpm. Drove it home smoking like a forest fire. Good riddance.
__________________
Never a dull moment at Berry Hill Farm. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Incredible engines, but unfortunately extremely impractical for everyday use. They burn oil by design, get poor gas mileage in relation to piston engines, make low torque (but decent hp) and at least with the Rx-8s, must be completely warmed up before shutting off (no quick trips to the store). When I was test driving the mazdaspeed3, I only kept thinking what if they put the 270hp, 290tq screamer 4banger in the RX-8 chassis! That would be one hell of a car! I'm a big fan of the wankel but can't justify getting one until the price drops considerably, hopefully they'll refine and revive it.
__________________
TC Current stable: - 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL - 2007 Saturn sky redline - 2004 Explorer...under surgery. Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Last I heard they were working on a larger rotary with all new geometry, better mileage, etc. Guess not.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles 2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed 2005 Toyota Sienna 2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible 1999 Toyota Tacoma |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
It was a novel design that went on for too long.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
When I was a kid, I had the opportunity to drive an NSU Prinz, the first Wankel engined car ever available. Sometime later, I also drove a Suzuki RE-5 rotary engined bike. I would assume all of the examples of these have disappeared from the face of the earth by now.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In college, a friend of mine had a first-gen RX-7. It was light, quick for its time, and pretty nimble, no doubt in part to the front mid-engine location of the compact Wankel. I don't recall fuel economy being an issue, but I do have a distinct recollection of seeing an EPA mileage sticker on a then-new Mazda RX4 (a Toyota Celica-like vehicle) back in the mid-Seventies, which indicated 11 MPG city.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
During the early 70's I was talking to a GM wheel who told me that GM was giving up on the rotary since they could not get any more than 60,000 miles out of one. He said they had their best people working on it since they already had cars designed to take the engine and they did not want to dump all the work they had done on them, but that there was no way they could make it work.
The AMC Pacer was also supposed to debut with a rotary. I don't know what their source was to be. I do remember him telling me GM's big problem was seal life; the seals at the edges of the rotor, that is. They even tried to design the engine so changing the seals would be a simple jobs, but then it was impossible for the average mechanic to put the case back together with the precision necessary. I guess an engine with so few moving parts sounds good in theory. But in a practical application........ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Mercedes did Wankels right by never putting it into production. They decided to focus on diesels instead.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I could build a 12A or 13B in one day. But after a few hundred anything gets easy. Had a R100 (think Datsun210) stuffed with a 13B, fully ported with Weber 42's, alu flywheel. Less than 2k lb. Cost me less than $3k to build with cage,seat and cell.
__________________
Happy Benzing Darryl, Hill 2005 SL55 AMG Kleemanized 1984 500 SEC 1967 W113 California Coupe [SIGPIC] https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
It was way quick too wasn't it hill?
I remember riding in the first one I had ever seen back around '72/'73 or so. It was not the RX body style. Acceleration was quite impressive back then.
__________________
Jim |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
It scared a few Porches But the best part it looked like a POS with 8lb to 1hp
__________________
Happy Benzing Darryl, Hill 2005 SL55 AMG Kleemanized 1984 500 SEC 1967 W113 California Coupe [SIGPIC] https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Mazda confirms development of next-generation rotary engine
Quote:
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words |
Bookmarks |
|
|