Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2011, 08:49 AM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 13,666
a moment of silence for the rotary engine

Seems like it was only yesterday that it was introduced.

Mazda to stop building rotary engined cars

__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2011, 09:40 AM
R Leo's Avatar
Stella!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: En te l'eau Rant
Posts: 5,393
Wankels. The way Popular Mechanics went on about them in the 60's, weren't they supposed to be the cure to all our reciprocating woes, while simultaneously solving hair loss and restoring virginity?

I had a Mazda rotary pickup in the 80's. The thing ran like a spotted-assed ape but only got about 10mpg. I'd had enough of it's 2qt/fillup oil consumption and swapped out the rotary for a 2800cc V6 out of a Mustang II. A sweet conversion, it dropped right in and bolted up to the driveshaft.

Before pulling the rotary, I went out on a drive with the intention of blowing that Wankel to Kingdom come...only then I discovered that it had a rev limiter and audible warning that went off above 9000rpm.

Drove it home smoking like a forest fire. Good riddance.
__________________
Never a dull moment at Berry Hill Farm.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2011, 09:54 AM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,370
Incredible engines, but unfortunately extremely impractical for everyday use. They burn oil by design, get poor gas mileage in relation to piston engines, make low torque (but decent hp) and at least with the Rx-8s, must be completely warmed up before shutting off (no quick trips to the store). When I was test driving the mazdaspeed3, I only kept thinking what if they put the 270hp, 290tq screamer 4banger in the RX-8 chassis! That would be one hell of a car! I'm a big fan of the wankel but can't justify getting one until the price drops considerably, hopefully they'll refine and revive it.
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2011, 10:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 833
Last I heard they were working on a larger rotary with all new geometry, better mileage, etc. Guess not.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2011, 10:13 AM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
It was a novel design that went on for too long.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-07-2011, 05:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: St. Thomas PA
Posts: 957
When I was a kid, I had the opportunity to drive an NSU Prinz, the first Wankel engined car ever available. Sometime later, I also drove a Suzuki RE-5 rotary engined bike. I would assume all of the examples of these have disappeared from the face of the earth by now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-07-2011, 05:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
In college, a friend of mine had a first-gen RX-7. It was light, quick for its time, and pretty nimble, no doubt in part to the front mid-engine location of the compact Wankel. I don't recall fuel economy being an issue, but I do have a distinct recollection of seeing an EPA mileage sticker on a then-new Mazda RX4 (a Toyota Celica-like vehicle) back in the mid-Seventies, which indicated 11 MPG city.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-07-2011, 06:00 PM
Pooka
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 664
During the early 70's I was talking to a GM wheel who told me that GM was giving up on the rotary since they could not get any more than 60,000 miles out of one. He said they had their best people working on it since they already had cars designed to take the engine and they did not want to dump all the work they had done on them, but that there was no way they could make it work.

The AMC Pacer was also supposed to debut with a rotary. I don't know what their source was to be.

I do remember him telling me GM's big problem was seal life; the seals at the edges of the rotor, that is. They even tried to design the engine so changing the seals would be a simple jobs, but then it was impossible for the average mechanic to put the case back together with the precision necessary.

I guess an engine with so few moving parts sounds good in theory. But in a practical application........
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-07-2011, 06:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooka View Post
During the early 70's I was talking to a GM wheel who told me that GM was giving up on the rotary since they could not get any more than 60,000 miles out of one. He said they had their best people working on it since they already had cars designed to take the engine and they did not want to dump all the work they had done on them, but that there was no way they could make it work.

The AMC Pacer was also supposed to debut with a rotary. I don't know what their source was to be.

I do remember him telling me GM's big problem was seal life; the seals at the edges of the rotor, that is. They even tried to design the engine so changing the seals would be a simple jobs, but then it was impossible for the average mechanic to put the case back together with the precision necessary.

I guess an engine with so few moving parts sounds good in theory. But in a practical application........
The cars in question were the 1975 Chevy Monza and its intra-division cousins. They had fairly high transmission tunnels within their interiors to accomodate the Wankel output shaft, which is usually higher than the crankshaft of a piston engine. IIRC, the Pacer was to secure their engines from GM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-07-2011, 06:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,065
Mercedes did Wankels right by never putting it into production. They decided to focus on diesels instead.
__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-07-2011, 07:01 PM
hill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Calif Sacramento
Posts: 736
I could build a 12A or 13B in one day. But after a few hundred anything gets easy. Had a R100 (think Datsun210) stuffed with a 13B, fully ported with Weber 42's, alu flywheel. Less than 2k lb. Cost me less than $3k to build with cage,seat and cell.
__________________
Happy Benzing
Darryl, Hill
2005 SL55 AMG Kleemanized
1984 500 SEC
1967 W113 California Coupe
[SIGPIC]
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-07-2011, 07:54 PM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 13,666
It was way quick too wasn't it hill?
I remember riding in the first one I had ever seen back around '72/'73 or so. It was not the RX body style. Acceleration was quite impressive back then.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-07-2011, 08:07 PM
hill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Calif Sacramento
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by engatwork View Post
It was way quick too wasn't it hill?
I remember riding in the first one I had ever seen back around '72/'73 or so. It was not the RX body style. Acceleration was quite impressive back then.
It scared a few Porches But the best part it looked like a POS with 8lb to 1hp
__________________
Happy Benzing
Darryl, Hill
2005 SL55 AMG Kleemanized
1984 500 SEC
1967 W113 California Coupe
[SIGPIC]
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-11-2011, 02:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,065
Mazda confirms development of next-generation rotary engine

Quote:
If you're a fan of the Wankel engine, chances are that there's a soft place in your heart for the Mazda Motor Corporation. It's also likely that you've been saddened at the uncertain future of Mazda's rotary engines given that the RX-8 is now completing its production run. You'd be happy, then, to read a new tweet from Mazda PR's twitter account:

We thank you all very much for the messages of support for the RX-8 and the rotary engine! It's made a deep impression on us. Currently Mazda is working to implement its breakthrough SkyActiv technology and eagerly developing a new model with a next-generation rotary engine. We look forward to your continuing support!

The wording of the Japanese makes it unclear if the new rotary engine will be branded as part of the new SkyActiv series of fuel-efficient engines from Mazda. But it's the firmest confirmation yet that Mazda will continue to develop this unique powerplant.
Mazda confirms development of next-generation rotary engine | JCarBlog

__________________
CENSORED due to not family friendly words
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page