Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst
make more laws!!???
|
It is interesting that virtually the same constituency that is perfectly accepting of and advocates for cognative infiltration/mass behavior modification efforts using any means at their disposal, as has been and continues to be done with say tobacco and smokers, and how in another recent thread similar effort is being championed as a perfectly legitimate and proper effort to be directed at "less than I have determined the responsibility threshold to be" gun owners.
And this is being considered in response to what is a statistically insignificant number of gun related annual fatalities.
While in the US 1.3 million abortion fatalities anually are immune from any such similar government sponsored and implimented behavior modification efforts, to in any way negativize the industrial extermination of the not yet birthed is verboten. In fact, doing it in certain places is a felony!
Likewise HIV/AIDS infections aare 50,000 annualy, and HIV/AIDS deaths are 20,000 annually, and the result is little more than human dancing condoms passing out prophalactics at gay pride events! Safe sex is fun, normal and natural!
Anyone think that the propaganda that will directed at guns will mirror the same tone, Safe gun ownership and use is fun, normal, and natural,?
More likely is will something along the lines of, What is wrong with you that you desire the capacity to possess objects only designed to harm innocents which no normal balanced and compassionate human would ever desire, repent surrender your killing tool, inform on others who won't surrender and repent there killing tools, if you don't you are personally responsible anytime any human innocent or guilty is harmed by guns, particularly those who suffer distress and fear that guns even exist, why do you hate, stop the hate, surrender guns, repent!!!!! Surrender! Repent!
Smokers and smoking have been pilloried and villified in everyway imaginable, so effective and to such an extent that it has become perfectly acceptable to criminalize the use of that legal product in open public spaces such as the effing beach, with the argument that the existence of second hand smoke of any imaginable quantity is a threat to someone and that the use of legal tobacco products in public spaces can be construed as an unacceptable and therefore impermissable tacit endorsement of tobacco by irresponsible civil authority. There is no expense or other limitation to the shaming, ostracizing, demonising, criminalization of the right and freedom of individuals who choose to use a legal product.
Make no mistake, it has already been stated soon after Newtown, liberals intend to shape the narrative to effect and to an end where their vision of a society where gun ownership is viewed as every bit as hated and pilloried as tobacco usage is the ultimate goal. They have no qualms about using Hollywood/media, government authority, and lawfare to achieve that end, all the while exterminating the not yet birthed and celebrating the culture of free fatal STDs, without eminating even a hint of irony and hipocricy.