Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-12-2013, 02:23 PM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
And that is EXACTLY what I am saying. Could you not tell that from what I wrote?

It appears that there are some people who are not at all disturbed by this. I don't understand why not. Are they just turning the other way for fear of it effecting their case for abortion? I don't get it. Why is EVERYONE not outraged by it, regardless of whether they are pro life or pro choice.
I don't see how it much affects any case for or against abortion. That's why he's being tried with murder charges for babies rather than murder charges for fetuses.

__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-12-2013, 02:27 PM
Chris Bell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jorn View Post
Long live the Taliban.
Long live Mao and is other murdering socialist friends.
__________________
I'm sick of .sig files
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-12-2013, 02:29 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by neumann View Post
what is mens rea?
Mens rea | LII / Legal Information Institute
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-12-2013, 02:35 PM
jplinville's Avatar
Conservative
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dayton, Ohio region
Posts: 302
I can't believe that there are those in this world that would think that what the doctor did is proper. Listening to this argument from a Planned Parenthood rep is completely disgusting...

Video: Planned Parenthood Official Argues for Right to Post-Birth Abortion | The Weekly Standard

In essence, the doctor was doing what this lady is arguing for.

And they called Vietnam Vets, "baby-killers"...
__________________
1987 560SL
85,000 miles




Meet on the level, leave on the square. Great words to live by

Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread. - Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-12-2013, 02:45 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Didn't listen to it, but the article states that the PP official stated the position that the decision should be left in the hands of the woman and the doctor.

Not exactly what you and the Weekly Standard are claiming was said.

I know very little about this kind of thing, but how old are these babies they are discussing?
Do they actually have a viable shot at survival?
Are they incredibly damaged by the abortion attempt?
Who would provide the $$ to save these babies?

It seems to me that there's a knee jerk reaction in assuming that they are discussing the killing of perfect little 9 month old babies.... is this actually the case?
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-12-2013, 02:55 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines View Post
I don't see how it much affects any case for or against abortion. That's why he's being tried with murder charges for babies rather than murder charges for fetuses.
Duh! Did I say anything to dispute that? MAN! I think that you put way too much weight in the person WRITING the post and not enough in what I WROTE!

Do you REALLY think that I am so stupid that I don't understand that he is being tried for murder?

The ONLY issue of any political nature here is whether or not this issue is being down played by the media for fear of it being construed as an abortion issue. One that could cast a bad light on abortion.

GEEZ MAN, I know you can't stand me, but has that emotion really made you think that I'm completely and totally stupid?
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-12-2013, 02:58 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by jplinville View Post
I can't believe that there are those in this world that would think that what the doctor did is proper. Listening to this argument from a Planned Parenthood rep is completely disgusting...

Video: Planned Parenthood Official Argues for Right to Post-Birth Abortion | The Weekly Standard

In essence, the doctor was doing what this lady is arguing for.

And they called Vietnam Vets, "baby-killers"...

Yes, but you have to look at the group of people that CALLED the Vets baby killers. The youngsters of that era that participated in that are the oldsters that are protecting this kind of crap today.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-12-2013, 03:00 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmbdiesel View Post
Didn't listen to it, but the article states that the PP official stated the position that the decision should be left in the hands of the woman and the doctor.

Not exactly what you and the Weekly Standard are claiming was said.

I know very little about this kind of thing, but how old are these babies they are discussing?
Do they actually have a viable shot at survival?
Are they incredibly damaged by the abortion attempt?
Who would provide the $$ to save these babies?

It seems to me that there's a knee jerk reaction in assuming that they are discussing the killing of perfect little 9 month old babies.... is this actually the case?
Oh well... thanks for clearing this up. If the Mom says it's okay to murder the baby that is living outside of the womb, then it is okay, legal and fine.

Oh! why didn't they say that to start with? That makes it all okay.

Sure am glad my Mom didn't think I was all that ugly when I came out of the womb. Of course, if she had, it would have cheated you guys out of your daily punching bag.
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-12-2013, 03:00 PM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Duh! Did I say anything to dispute that? MAN! I think that you put way too much weight in the person WRITING the post and not enough in what I WROTE!

Do you REALLY think that I am so stupid that I don't understand that he is being tried for murder?

The ONLY issue of any political nature here is whether or not this issue is being down played by the media for fear of it being construed as an abortion issue. One that could cast a bad light on abortion.

GEEZ MAN, I know you can't stand me, but has that emotion really made you think that I'm completely and totally stupid?
Um, calm down? God forbid I agree with you for once. And I can perfectly stand you btw, not sure on vice versa given the above.

Quote:
Are they just turning the other way for fear of it effecting their case for abortion?
Did I not directly address this question?
Quote:
I don't see how it much affects any case for or against abortion. That's why he's being tried with murder charges for babies rather than murder charges for fetuses.
Perhaps I was responding to your statement rather than you

Edit: I'm not even sure how else you can expect someone to respond to that question.
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth

Last edited by tbomachines; 04-12-2013 at 03:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-12-2013, 03:02 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines View Post
Um, calm down? God forbid I agree with you for once. And I can perfectly stand you btw, not sure on vice versa given the above.


Did I not directly address this question?

Perhaps I was responding to your statement rather than you

__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 04-12-2013, 03:20 PM
Inna-propriate-da-vida
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Oh well... thanks for clearing this up. If the Mom says it's okay to murder the baby that is living outside of the womb, then it is okay, legal and fine.
Can you stop yourself after you have jumped off a bridge?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Oh! why didn't they say that to start with? That makes it all okay.
Why was the headline a deliberate mis-interpretation, rather than reflect what was actually said??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road View Post
Sure am glad my Mom didn't think I was all that ugly when I came out of the womb. Of course, if she had, it would have cheated you guys out of your daily punching bag.
Either way, we have still gotten just as many of our questions answered....
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST

1983 300SD - 305000
1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000
1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000

https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-12-2013, 03:29 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Onset MA
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines View Post
Well these cases are not abortions. This guy was killing healthy delivered babies after they're born rather than a fetus within the womb. Different issue.
So based on the reporting you're aware of and perhaps your local knowledge, Gosnell was not engaged in the abortion business and in the act of providing abortion procedures when these alleged crimes occured? Was he just hanging around delivery rooms and birthing facilities and somehow gained access to newly born children that he then fatally attacked for unknown reasons?

Seems according to all the reporting he was an abortion provider and in the course of preforming abortions, he induced or facilitated the evacuation of the wombs of his patients and then the living human being that had been formerly residing in the recently forcibly evacuated womb was with malice aforthought deliberately and purposely executed. The only deviation from the normal procedure was that Gosnell removed the living human from the womb first and then executed it, where had he followed the normal procedure wherein the living human while still residing in its mother's womb is dismembered using a scalpel and forceps and collection of dissected body parts disgarded as "tissue".

These "babies" (your words) had been forcibly removed prematurely from the womb are entitled to the protection but had they not be prematurely forceably removed from the womb are not "babies" but are fetuses not entitled to protection.

So the disticntion between protected and unprotected is nothing more than if the "baby" resides in the womb or not? By your own rational the "fetus" could be healthy, fully developed, viable, capable of living and breathing outside of the womb but yet "unborn" (forcibly or otherwise) have no protection whereas once removed from the womb instantly becomes a "baby" entitled to every protection? If the being is partially outside the womb is it a baby or a fetus, does it have to be fully outside to be a baby, or if an arm or leg remains not completely outside is it still a fetus? Can a being with only its head exposed be decapitated as a fetus? What if it is breathing and crying? One partial birth procedure involves delivering the being's body outside and the skull punctured, evacuated, and crushed while still remaining in the womb.

The difference between lawful abortion and unlawful murder is not the stage of human potential development aka viability of the being, but only the degree to which the being happens to exist "in" or "out" of a womb at the time of its execution?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-12-2013, 03:41 PM
tbomachines's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 7,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by FYVMMF View Post
So based on the reporting you're aware of and perhaps your local knowledge, Gosnell was not engaged in the abortion business and in the act of providing abortion procedures when these alleged crimes occured? Was he just hanging around delivery rooms and birthing facilities and somehow gained access to newly born children that he then fatally attacked for unknown reasons?

Seems according to all the reporting he was an abortion provider and in the course of preforming abortions, he induced or facilitated the evacuation of the wombs of his patients and then the living human being that had been formerly residing in the recently forcibly evacuated womb was with malice aforthought deliberately and purposely executed. The only deviation from the normal procedure was that Gosnell removed the living human from the womb first and then executed it, where had he followed the normal procedure wherein the living human while still residing in its mother's womb is dismembered using a scalpel and forceps and collection of dissected body parts disgarded as "tissue".

These "babies" (your words) had been forcibly removed prematurely from the womb are entitled to the protection but had they not be prematurely forceably removed from the womb are not "babies" but are fetuses not entitled to protection.

So the disticntion between protected and unprotected is nothing more than if the "baby" resides in the womb or not? By your own rational the "fetus" could be healthy, fully developed, viable, capable of living and breathing outside of the womb but yet "unborn" (forcibly or otherwise) have no protection whereas once removed from the womb instantly becomes a "baby" entitled to every protection? If the being is partially outside the womb is it a baby or a fetus, does it have to be fully outside to be a baby, or if an arm or leg remains not completely outside is it still a fetus? Can a being with only its head exposed be decapitated as a fetus? What if it is breathing and crying? One partial birth procedure involves delivering the being's body outside and the skull punctured, evacuated, and crushed while still remaining in the womb.

The difference between lawful abortion and unlawful murder is not the stage of human potential development aka viability of the being, but only the degree to which the being happens to exist "in" or "out" of a womb at the time of its execution?
Gosh, where have I heard this style and tone before?

Anyways, there's a reason late-term abortions are illegal, because the babies are viable outside the womb. TMK those, (along with the woman who died) are what he is being charged with. Conflating those with early term abortions and doctors who perform legal abortions is erroneous.

That's like equating all bankers to Bernie Madoff
__________________
TC
Current stable:
- 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL
- 2007 Saturn sky redline
- 2004 Explorer...under surgery.

Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-12-2013, 05:19 PM
waterboarding w/medmech
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Coming to your hometown
Posts: 7,987
re Planned parenthood, Margaret Seanger (sic) was a racist and she envisioned riiding the human population of it's "weeds", in her definition, blacks, asians & Indians..... sorts like Hitler, but longer lasting...
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-12-2013, 05:26 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 47,550
Is that what PP is about today? If they changed their name would that make you feel better?

__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page