Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2006, 05:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Derby, England, UK
Posts: 39
First pics 5.0 M117 into 190e (UK)

Thought I'd share the first pics of my project with you, I'm currently putting an M117 5.0 V8 (out of my old 1990 500se that caught the rust bug!) into my 190e.

Just lining it up as it is now, it looks like I'll be able to retain the steering box etc. I'm currently working on fabricating the engine and gearbox mounts, then I'll start on the wiring! The only mod I've had to make so far is the metal around the fusebox had to be hammered back a little as it was in the way of the cylinder bank.

I'll keep the post updated with pics and information every now and then as I'm working through the project. Although with dark nights and a family, time is short!!



__________________
1990 420SEL 217k Miles
1975 Chevy K10 400ci SBC power!
1995 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 Limited
1997 Suzuki GSXR750 SRAD
1989 Kawasaki GT550G4

Last edited by bladerunner30; 01-25-2006 at 05:52 AM. Reason: Title change
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2006, 06:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 182
Nice fit!

In a few months (this year for sure) i will start also with putting a V8 (32valve m119) in a 190, so maybe we can help each other!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2006, 05:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Derby, England, UK
Posts: 39
That's gonna be an even tighter squeeze than the M117. There's a guy on www.mbcoupes.com who put an M119 in a W126 SEC, looked snug even in that.

Good luck though, and let me know how you get on - I'll hopefully have my engine properly mounted by mid next week, so at least I can move the thing and get it in my garage to do the wiring, it's no fun working outside in 0 degrees C....!!

Cheers, Martin
__________________
1990 420SEL 217k Miles
1975 Chevy K10 400ci SBC power!
1995 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 Limited
1997 Suzuki GSXR750 SRAD
1989 Kawasaki GT550G4
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2006, 06:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 182
Yes, will be hard to get the 32v v8 in there, but i am not in a hurry....
Most important tools will be an angle grinder and a welding machine

Anyway, i am gonna make it myself a bit more dificult: i want to lay the engine as far as possible to the rear. My goal is to get the flywheel about UNDER the windscreen-wiper-motor. This means that some parts have to be changed very much. For instance the heater blower.

In the end though, the weight distribution will be better.

I am planning doing this on my 190d, which i a have now as my daily driver. As soon as i finish my renault clio 2.0 16v for track use (couple of weeks), and my other daily driver (w123 diesel) is recovered from its winter sleep, i am pulling the 2.0 diesel from the 190.
I bought this car a bit damaged on the left front angle. When replacing some chassis parts on that side, i didnt weld them in place (like they are original), but i attached them with a lot of small screws.
This way, the whole left front angle can be removed very easily. When the 'thriller' begins, i am planning on doing this to the other side as well.

This way it will be a lot easier placing, and working on the large v8 engine.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2006, 01:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 112
well actually the weight is not so big problem, cause M119 uses alloy block while m113 (2.6 etc) uses metalblock wich is allmost at the same weight and as you know, the 2.6 190e came from stock aswell...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-30-2006, 03:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Derby, England, UK
Posts: 39
Sounds like a lot more work than mine will (hopefully) end up being! Having said that, this is my first 'car' project (mostly played with modifying bikes up until now!), so we'll just have to see how it goes!

Just as a matter of interest, whereabouts are you based? I'm guessing UK or Europe seeing as you've prepped a 2.0 Clio for the track?

Are you expecting to have to switch to rack and pinion steering? I'd guess that you probably will? I've considered it myself too (mostly for exhaust manifold clearance issues), possibly out of an E30 3 series BMW, as it's a similar sized vehicle.... Any thoughts on it?

Cheers, Martin
__________________
1990 420SEL 217k Miles
1975 Chevy K10 400ci SBC power!
1995 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 Limited
1997 Suzuki GSXR750 SRAD
1989 Kawasaki GT550G4
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-31-2006, 05:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 182
I live in the Netherlands, so you are right about that!

As far as the steering: I am afraid I cant do it without rack and pinion steering. I've read here some things about that, and i believe it is very much work to get it done right, so that it handles well. Read a post of Tobias, who put a Chevy or Ford V8 in a 190, and he said it was more work to convert to rack and pinion, than to place the engine......

But I will look at other possibilities when the engine sits in place.
Maybe:
-when the engine sits a lot more to the rear, i will have less problems..
-i can lead the exhaust pipe to another direction, to the front for instance, maybe do something with the manifold...
-Steering box from a 190 without power steering is smaller, if there are any...

Anyway, I will do a lot to keep the original steering box, but until the engine sits in place, I cannot say its possible.

As you say: the cilinder heads of the 32v are almost 1,5 times wider.....

Maybe later on I'll laugh out loud for my idea of keeping the original steering box
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-31-2006, 05:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by altz
well actually the weight is not so big problem, cause M119 uses alloy block while m113 (2.6 etc) uses metalblock wich is allmost at the same weight and as you know, the 2.6 190e came from stock aswell...
I also thought of that, yes. But it is always better to put the weight as close to the middle as possible.
And I heard some people say that a 190 with a V8 would be dramatically understeered. But they dont drive a 190 with V8.... But you hold this in your mind when thinking about this project.

And my almost standard 190 2.3 16v is also to much understeered, and it has only a four cilinder!!!
Mercedes makes the handling of their cars understeered, period. For all the nitwits who cant drive.....

So in the end, to lose understeer, I definately need to get more camber on the front wheels, but as is said: thats also needed with only a four cilinder.

To get a standard 190 into a drift, you have to throw with the car, and put the power on at the same time.
Just flooring it when riding in a wet corner, it still goes understeer...
Believe me: i know
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2006, 08:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 182
pheww.......

30 minutes ago, dream come true! Comes a guy ive never seen before here at the door, asks if my 190 2.3-16v is for sale. Said no, and start talking with him about 190's 16v. He also has a 16v, which he sometimes races at racetracks, but has got a lot of rust. So he is looking for a replacement.
Then, after 15 minutes he (by the way) mentions has also got a 500E.
I said: have you got it with you? says yes. So we go look at his 500E.
I said: I'm afraid to ask (joke)......
I thought, ill ask him if HE can show me the power of the V8, and how fast it is.
So he walks to the passenger side, and steps in the car at that side.......

no-one else but me was standing outside the car, no-one was in the drivers seat, the engine was running and warm

Took it for a spin off course!! This thing keeps on going and going and going and going, no signs that it had gotten tired, keeps on going and going...etc.
180 km/u where 80 was allowed....Then had to brake because i was in the next village. Back the same way... If you couldnt feel the force that pulls you in the seat, and couldnt sea the speedometer, it would be dull, so silent is this car. Imagine what such an engine does in a car which is 400 kg lighter....bit more engine-noise.....
You can understand im happy now!

Anyway, got to go now, Catherine Zeta Jones is at the door now!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-31-2006, 10:12 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
if putting

a v8 in the 190 i would buy a big heavy diesel battery and put it in the pass rear side trunk. this will go a long way toward making the balance neutral. someone posted a thread with engine weights recently and the v8 aluminum was only about 20 pounds heavier than the 602 diesel and lighter than the 603 i believe. i think the 2,6 gasser would be nearly the same as a 602 in weight.

i would try to keep as much stock as possible so future maintenance is more possible.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-01-2006, 12:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 553
I'd be interested to see a picture of how close you are to that steering box.
__________________
George Carstens
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-02-2006, 04:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Derby, England, UK
Posts: 39
It's not the greatest photo in the world, but it should hopefully give you a good idea of how close it is. The top bit, where the nut is is approx 10mm away from the block, it gets progressively further away as the V narrows towards the crank.

__________________
1990 420SEL 217k Miles
1975 Chevy K10 400ci SBC power!
1995 Jeep Cherokee 4.0 Limited
1997 Suzuki GSXR750 SRAD
1989 Kawasaki GT550G4
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-02-2006, 04:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 182
phew, lucky for me

I have plenty of room on that side of the engine bay!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by reinier
I have plenty of room on that side of the engine bay!
Jeah me to, but @ te other side?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-02-2006, 11:51 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
i would watch that closely

an engine rocks around a lot and you dont want it banging into the steering nut. you might need to shim that side motor mount a little to lean the engine over to the right a bit.

tom w

__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page