|
|
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I used the Split Second AIC1-A2L which is for the two additional injectors. The key to power and not burning holes in your pistons is to get the AFR around 12.5:1 under boost. Keep me posted, anything I can help you with feel free to ask ! Happy New year Ed A.
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg 1971 280SL ROADSTER 1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY 1994 E320 CABRIOLET 1999 C43 AMG 2005 G55K AMG 2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
You know the thought occurred to me last night that your fuel maps would probably be of great value to me since I will be running the identical setup and the same level of boost. Is there any way you can do a data dump from the Split Second or perhaps convert you computer map file to a pdf. Even better would be to email a copy of your fuel map file since I will be using the R4 software to program my unit as well.
Do you run a AFR meter in your car? What gauges are you using to monitor the health of the turbo related systems? Thanks again for all your help and a happy new year to you too. Kurt S. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Well I just got back from a road trip over the new year. The car got 25.1 MPG on the highway including a climb from sea level over a 4000 foot pass and down again. That's about 3 mpg better than I got prior to replacing the diff 3.46 gear with the 2.88 gear. Going up hills I just grab 3rd gear and the car is as happy as it can be with the stock engine. Now I am ready for the turbo's as soon as I get the tranny rebuilt.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
RBYCC,
Are ya still out there? Motor Head |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
AH! Someone else had this idea and acted upon it. I think I sent you a PM, but if not... how do you feel acceleration is starting in first with the 2.88:1? What about a 70mph cruise down the road?
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look. '85 300SD 245k '87 300SDL 251k '90 300SEL 326k Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford. Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG] |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
I think I'm here ????
Having major lower back problems, but improving !!! Should be visiting more . Ed A
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg 1971 280SL ROADSTER 1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY 1994 E320 CABRIOLET 1999 C43 AMG 2005 G55K AMG 2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Hit Man X,
Actually, my wife (it's really her car you know) thinks it accelerates better with the 2.88 gear and I agree but let me qualify my statement. It accelerates better at part throttle and the reason I believe this is true is because we are in the converter a lot more with the lower gear and reaping the benefits of torque multiplication. However, when we reach freeway speeds we are safely above the converter stall speed so I don't worry about overheating the transmission. Acceleration from say 70 mph seems about the same and 3rd gear is definitely more useful during a downshift. Full throttle acceleration is slightly penalized but since we don't drag race the 300 SEL it's not to much of an imposition I got what I was looking for in this swap with the improved fuel economy and the engine is much more relaxed at freeway speeds. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sorry to hear about your back but glad you are... back |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Makes total sense and just the reply I was looking for. I'd gladly give up some acceleration for smoother part throttle driving along with lower revs in each gear. The 300 is a cruiser, not a stop light bandit. Do you still have it coming off a dead stop in 2nd gear? 70mph cruise RPM? 2800-2900?
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look. '85 300SD 245k '87 300SDL 251k '90 300SEL 326k Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford. Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG] |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
I still have it starting in 2nd gear but have a first gear start valve body ready to go in when I do the rebuild.
To my recollection you are about right on the rpm @ 70 mph. It works out to about a 600 rpm drop over the old 3.46 gear. |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Excellent.
Did you mod the VB to start in first yourself or send it out? Sorry for all the questions.. ALSO - I have the factory PDF for the 722.3 if it can help you. PM me with your email and I'll zip it over. Please be certain it'll accept a large file.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look. '85 300SD 245k '87 300SDL 251k '90 300SEL 326k Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford. Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG] Last edited by Hit Man X; 01-21-2008 at 06:13 PM. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Any pictures of the modifyed valve body?
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Hit Man,
I had the valve body done by Mario Aristides at Independent Transmissions in Miami. He is a small business but a recognized Mercedes trans expert. In fact, I understand that he designed the shift kit you can order from superior transmission on the internet. You can reach him @ (786)597-7738 Superior Transmission Shift Kit: http://www.superior-transmission.com/products/shift_correction/722A_g.htm But to answer your questions above, the answer is yes and yes First I installed a kit supplied by Mario into my own valve body. It was a combination of a shift improvement kit and a first gear start. It wasn't to tough to do but I have some experience with valve bodies. The shifting was greatly improved but I could never get the car to start in first. After a number of discussions with Mario we determined that my valve body fell into a roughly six month production run that is not compatible with the normal first gear start mods. As a result I just had him build, test, and ship me a valve body and seperator plate which I have not yet installed. The valve body is fully assembled so there isn't much to see. A word of caution: be prepared to wait if you comission the valve body mods. It took about six months for him to turn my stuff around but I was in no hurry. Let me know if I can answer any other questions. Motor Head |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Can you talk a bit about the overall driveablity of the car now?
What does 1st gear "feel" like with the 2.88 rear? Compared with stock? Thanks!
__________________
'90 300SE 298k -300K and it gets put into retirement. '80 300D 255k Purchased new by family in 1980. Had a: 1973 220 (gas) 1980 300SD 1992 400E |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
2.88:1 + first gear is lower than 3.47:1 + second gear.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look. '85 300SD 245k '87 300SDL 251k '90 300SEL 326k Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford. Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG] |
Bookmarks |
|
|