Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:08 PM
RBYCC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 1,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motor Head View Post
More specifically, I have a partial Mosselman kit with all the important parts like the manifolds, turbos, and some of the piping. I do not have the electronics so to Split Second will solve that problem. I realize I'll have to fab some custom pieces with injector bungs but that is not a problem. I'll give Mark a call to find out which unit will work for my application.
Sounds like you have a great start with all the major hard parts.
I used the Split Second AIC1-A2L which is for the two additional injectors.

The key to power and not burning holes in your pistons is to get the AFR around 12.5:1 under boost.

Keep me posted, anything I can help you with feel free to ask !

Happy New year

Ed A.

__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg
1971 280SL ROADSTER
1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY
1994 E320 CABRIOLET
1999 C43 AMG
2005 G55K AMG
2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-31-2007, 08:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ojai, Ca.
Posts: 88
You know the thought occurred to me last night that your fuel maps would probably be of great value to me since I will be running the identical setup and the same level of boost. Is there any way you can do a data dump from the Split Second or perhaps convert you computer map file to a pdf. Even better would be to email a copy of your fuel map file since I will be using the R4 software to program my unit as well.

Do you run a AFR meter in your car? What gauges are you using to monitor the health of the turbo related systems?

Thanks again for all your help and a happy new year to you too.

Kurt S.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-03-2008, 11:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ojai, Ca.
Posts: 88
Well I just got back from a road trip over the new year. The car got 25.1 MPG on the highway including a climb from sea level over a 4000 foot pass and down again. That's about 3 mpg better than I got prior to replacing the diff 3.46 gear with the 2.88 gear. Going up hills I just grab 3rd gear and the car is as happy as it can be with the stock engine. Now I am ready for the turbo's as soon as I get the tranny rebuilt.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-07-2008, 06:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ojai, Ca.
Posts: 88
RBYCC,

Are ya still out there?

Motor Head
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-07-2008, 06:23 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Motor Head View Post
Well I just got back from a road trip over the new year. The car got 25.1 MPG on the highway including a climb from sea level over a 4000 foot pass and down again. That's about 3 mpg better than I got prior to replacing the diff 3.46 gear with the 2.88 gear. Going up hills I just grab 3rd gear and the car is as happy as it can be with the stock engine. Now I am ready for the turbo's as soon as I get the tranny rebuilt.


AH! Someone else had this idea and acted upon it.

I think I sent you a PM, but if not... how do you feel acceleration is starting in first with the 2.88:1? What about a 70mph cruise down the road?
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-09-2008, 08:58 AM
RBYCC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 1,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motor Head View Post
RBYCC,

Are ya still out there?

Motor Head
I think I'm here ????

Having major lower back problems, but improving !!!

Should be visiting more .

Ed A
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg
1971 280SL ROADSTER
1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY
1994 E320 CABRIOLET
1999 C43 AMG
2005 G55K AMG
2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-21-2008, 04:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ojai, Ca.
Posts: 88
Hit Man X,

Actually, my wife (it's really her car you know) thinks it accelerates better with the 2.88 gear and I agree but let me qualify my statement. It accelerates better at part throttle and the reason I believe this is true is because we are in the converter a lot more with the lower gear and reaping the benefits of torque multiplication. However, when we reach freeway speeds we are safely above the converter stall speed so I don't worry about overheating the transmission.

Acceleration from say 70 mph seems about the same and 3rd gear is definitely more useful during a downshift.

Full throttle acceleration is slightly penalized but since we don't drag race the 300 SEL it's not to much of an imposition

I got what I was looking for in this swap with the improved fuel economy and the engine is much more relaxed at freeway speeds.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-21-2008, 04:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ojai, Ca.
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBYCC View Post
I think I'm here ????

Having major lower back problems, but improving !!!

Should be visiting more .

Ed A
Ed,

Sorry to hear about your back but glad you are... back
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-21-2008, 05:29 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Motor Head View Post
Hit Man X,

Actually, my wife (it's really her car you know) thinks it accelerates better with the 2.88 gear and I agree but let me qualify my statement. It accelerates better at part throttle and the reason I believe this is true is because we are in the converter a lot more with the lower gear and reaping the benefits of torque multiplication. However, when we reach freeway speeds we are safely above the converter stall speed so I don't worry about overheating the transmission.

Acceleration from say 70 mph seems about the same and 3rd gear is definitely more useful during a downshift.

Full throttle acceleration is slightly penalized but since we don't drag race the 300 SEL it's not to much of an imposition

I got what I was looking for in this swap with the improved fuel economy and the engine is much more relaxed at freeway speeds.


Makes total sense and just the reply I was looking for. I'd gladly give up some acceleration for smoother part throttle driving along with lower revs in each gear. The 300 is a cruiser, not a stop light bandit.

Do you still have it coming off a dead stop in 2nd gear?

70mph cruise RPM? 2800-2900?
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-21-2008, 05:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ojai, Ca.
Posts: 88
I still have it starting in 2nd gear but have a first gear start valve body ready to go in when I do the rebuild.

To my recollection you are about right on the rpm @ 70 mph. It works out to about a 600 rpm drop over the old 3.46 gear.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 01-21-2008, 05:59 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Excellent.

Did you mod the VB to start in first yourself or send it out?

Sorry for all the questions..

ALSO - I have the factory PDF for the 722.3 if it can help you. PM me with your email and I'll zip it over. Please be certain it'll accept a large file.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]

Last edited by Hit Man X; 01-21-2008 at 06:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-23-2008, 11:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 112
Any pictures of the modifyed valve body?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-24-2008, 10:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ojai, Ca.
Posts: 88
Hit Man,

I had the valve body done by Mario Aristides at Independent Transmissions in Miami. He is a small business but a recognized Mercedes trans expert. In fact, I understand that he designed the shift kit you can order from superior transmission on the internet.

You can reach him @ (786)597-7738

Superior Transmission Shift Kit:

http://www.superior-transmission.com/products/shift_correction/722A_g.htm

But to answer your questions above, the answer is yes and yes

First I installed a kit supplied by Mario into my own valve body. It was a combination of a shift improvement kit and a first gear start. It wasn't to tough to do but I have some experience with valve bodies.

The shifting was greatly improved but I could never get the car to start in first.

After a number of discussions with Mario we determined that my valve body fell into a roughly six month production run that is not compatible with the normal first gear start mods. As a result I just had him build, test, and ship me a valve body and seperator plate which I have not yet installed. The valve body is fully assembled so there isn't much to see.

A word of caution: be prepared to wait if you comission the valve body mods. It took about six months for him to turn my stuff around but I was in no hurry.

Let me know if I can answer any other questions.

Motor Head
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-27-2008, 08:16 PM
fahrgewehr2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,264
Can you talk a bit about the overall driveablity of the car now?

What does 1st gear "feel" like with the 2.88 rear? Compared with stock?

Thanks!
__________________
'90 300SE 298k
-300K and it gets put into retirement.
'80 300D 255k Purchased new by family in 1980.

Had a:
1973 220 (gas)
1980 300SD
1992 400E
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-27-2008, 08:18 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by fahrgewehr2 View Post
Can you talk a bit about the overall driveablity of the car now?

What does 1st gear "feel" like with the 2.88 rear? Compared with stock?

Thanks!


2.88:1 + first gear is lower than 3.47:1 + second gear.

__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page