|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
If fuel economy is one of your priorities in addition to power, then I think a cost/benefit assessment would steer you toward shipping your IP off to Myna and simply installing a slightly larger turbo and IC setup. Myna's pumps are externally adjustable, so you could tailor the power output to suit the needs of the boost available as well as your interest in economy. Messing with gassers, would probably end up costing more ($/time) in the long run, since you already have the entire OM602 installed and ready for mods. I'd ditch your LPG setup once the IP is modded.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Cost to ship to Finland and back + the cost of the mod is about $1300. Cost of a larger turbo and intercooler ~ $800. Total cost for a ~250hp diesel engine ~$2100. Diesel fuel price is: ~100 ALL/ liter (~$1.18/liter) Cost of the m103 + multi point lpg injection ~$1300. Cost of om603 exh. manifold + turbo ~$300, so I can use the stock air filter box. A used om602 goes for about $1300 here. I can sell the om602 for about $1000 or even $800. LPG fuel price is: ~49 ALL/liter (~58 cent $/liter). So even if I don't sell my current engine the m103 is about $500 cheaper.
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
im not sure the turbo you talk of will be suitable for a petrol engine?
often diesel turbos are to small and designed for boost at alot lower revs/airflows |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Even the ones that exist are imports and custom tariffs and duties are too high. So there are very limited options. The brother of my fiancee is a mechanic and I can count on him on the swap, maintenance and modding. Quote:
I'm looking for about 220-250hp at the crank, that would be in the 6 psi range. What I'm worried instead is turbo lag. How difficult is it to fit a TPS to the m103 but without messing with the cis-e?
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
The time refers to the amount of it you'd need in order to wire/plumb the fuel system, engine management system, etc. Over here, we believe time = money.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Is cis-e that complicated?
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
No, but it still requires mounting the pump/accumulator and engine management items, and re-locating washer pump and lots of other big and small stuff that takes time to sort out--Maybe I'm just too lazy to bother with such things. The only way I'd undergo that swap, would be to buy the whole donor car, then just initiate a straight side-by-side swap. Over here, I don't think anyone would even contemplate such a project unless they had car with a dead engine and tons of spare time on their hands.
For the record, I had a FMIC custom made for $200, and a T3/T4 hybrid can be picked up for ~$150 (Chinese copy). |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
As for Chinese copy turbos ... I find them too risky.
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I'm following this thread with great interest. I haven't contributed anything like I usually do because I am still learning about this stuff myself. But I too am determined to do a LPG turbo car or two. The much higher octane rating of the LPG makes it a perfect match for boost.
Deni, could you please post links to the sites where you were reading about LPG injection systems? Regards, Eric |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
The only problem I see with a LPG fueled Turbo engine is that the tuning is counter intuitive.
If you run a rich AFR with LPG you end up with detonation as there is no cooling capacity in the LPG vapor /air mixture versus a Gasoline liquid/air mixture. You are better off with LPG running closer to stoichmetric and getting power by increasing boost. But increasing boost adds to engine component stress such as pistons, rings and rods. The LPG will need more intercooling due to the heat properties of the vapor/air mixture. I'm still a believer in a gasoline engine making more power at less cost and more safety then LPG. I wasn't a believer in using additional injectors for gasoline AFR enrichment as I was concerned about equal fuel distribution to all cylinders. Now I would not do a turbo on an older style engine any other way...the additional injectors mounted in line with the throttle body not only enrich the AFR, but act much like a water/alchohol injection as the gasoline mist acts like a cooling charge to the incoming boosted air !!! Just some thoughts on the subject...comments always appreciated as this is a great learning experience !!!
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg 1971 280SL ROADSTER 1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY 1994 E320 CABRIOLET 1999 C43 AMG 2005 G55K AMG 2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Here you can read something more about different LPG conversions: http://www.go-lpg.co.uk/which_conversion.html I still didn't get a clear answer if these outputs can be found (or easily added) on the cis-e setup: Oxygen (Lambda) sensor signal(s) (I think this is already there) Throttle Position Sensor (TPS) signal (does the cis-e have this output or can I add it somehow?) RPM (tach) signal (I guess this is already available) Manifold ambient pressure (MAP) (this looks easy) I'm leaning more on the m104 3.0 liter engine than a "little bit more complicated" turbo m103.
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The throttle is mechanical so there is no need for a sensor that gives you a linear output. You could possibly pull the throttle signal from the 3.2L M104 with HFM, not the 3.0L M104 with KE.
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg 1971 280SL ROADSTER 1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY 1994 E320 CABRIOLET 1999 C43 AMG 2005 G55K AMG 2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
IS it possible to explain online how can I do this ?
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
The M104-24V with HFM has an electronic throttle actuator. I am not that familiar wiith it, but there is a signal level sent from the pedal to the engine bay actuator. I'm not sure of the level or type of signal output, but I would assume it is linear...
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg 1971 280SL ROADSTER 1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY 1994 E320 CABRIOLET 1999 C43 AMG 2005 G55K AMG 2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES |
Bookmarks |
|
|