|
|
|
|
|
#47
04-17-2011, 03:57 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Jay, ----------------- -1995 Blue W202 C36 AMG (M) SOLD ;( -1995 Black W140 S500 (Lady) -1992 Black W124 E300 (Dima) (Ex-Mosselman Twin turbo Kit). -1988 Black W124 300 E 4-Matic.(Nadeen) -1983 Brown W126 500SEL.(Old Lady)(Sold) -1981 Gold W123 280CE.(Dareen)(Sold) http://www.youtube.com/user/jayrasheed 
|
|
#50
04-17-2011, 08:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Riyadh... Been about thirty years since I was there during the construction of NRIA airport, believed renamed to KKIA... Wasn't much of a modern city then, I'm sure much has changed... Good luck with your move !! There were some nice, straight long lengths of highway outside of the city.. 
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg 1971 280SL ROADSTER 1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY 1994 E320 CABRIOLET 1999 C43 AMG 2005 G55K AMG 2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES Last edited by RBYCC; 04-17-2011 at 10:09 AM.
|
|
#52
04-17-2011, 10:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
With all due respect and not trying to get into semantics, I find your statement incorrect as it doesn't fit the true definition of parasitic loss in an internal combustion engine. The definition of parasitic loss in an internal combustion engine is the friction of internal parts while in motion and any external device that is driven off the rotation of the crankshaft. Any device that is driven off the crank takes power away from what can be delivered to the drive train. Your response may come from your confusion as any rotating device has a parasitic loss. In the case of a turbo it has internal parasitic losses due to friction. However this internal loss doesn't link to the crankshaft. In essence nothing is 100% efficient. Back pressure doesn't create a parasitic loss as the boost is producing power and back pressure may or may not reduce the amount of power produced. Properly sized, minimal backpressure is used to generate the equivalent boost pressure. A 1:1 ratio between boost and exhaust pressure is considered very good, but back pressure can actually be less than the boost pressure in some applications. Conversely a supercharger has constant parasitic loss due to the fact that it is driven by the rotation of the crankshaft. In some instances you may realize as much as a 15% loss of power. Actual loss is determined by the mechanical efficency of the compressor. It is no more then a belt driven device no different then an alternator, AC compressor or power steering pump. 
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg 1971 280SL ROADSTER 1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY 1994 E320 CABRIOLET 1999 C43 AMG 2005 G55K AMG 2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES Last edited by RBYCC; 04-17-2011 at 10:13 AM.
|
|
#54
04-17-2011, 04:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
anyways im decided on the M103 engine. im in love with it. another option would be a 560SEL rear mounted Twin Turbo. its a bit early to talk about it.. its all day dreams for now. ---------- edited: not rear mounted on the 300SEL .
__________________
viagra prix maroc belgique www.viagrasansordonnancefr.com Last edited by osama; 04-17-2011 at 05:12 PM.
|
|
#55
04-18-2011, 06:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
dream brother dream!! its what keeps us alive in these trying times.
im also dreaming of dual charging my 2.0. like do the supercharger now and add on the turbo later. and do the necessary fuel system changes, getrag gearbox, lsd, wheels and brakes from a c55. cant wait to get my wideband o2 sensor. i feel like my whole life will change with that single item.
|
|
#56
04-18-2011, 07:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
viagra prix maroc belgique www.viagrasansordonnancefr.com
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
