Hehehehe just ordered it for my girl



Muffler stuff






[youtube]Nllmfpweltw[/youtube]

[youtube]UM6dSnhNHns&feature[/youtube]

All things being equal, turbos are proving to be the better choice for power and efficiency. Even the OEMs are realizing this. In recent years, Mercedes, Mini Cooper, and Cobalt SS have all switched from superchargers to turbos. Used to be, you could find a supercharged diesel once in a while. Not anymore, they're all turbocharged now too. Turbos rule. End of story.

Besides, if he ran a supercharger, what would he do with that pretty header?
Regards, Eric

__________________
89 300E "Benzer1" 15.924 Uncorrected
93 400E "Benzer3" 14.200 U.C.
95 E420 "Benzer4"
92 300E "Benzer5" 16.299 U.C. Future turbo CNG
87 300D "Benzer7"
87 300D "Benzer8"
87 300D "Benzer9"
87 300D/70 AMC Javelin "Sidewinder-Benzer"
87 300TD "Benzer11"
06 E320 CDI "Benzer12"
05 E320 CDI "Benzer12A"
71 AMC Javelin AMX 401 "Sidewinder"
74 AMC Hornet 401 "C.K.10" 13.63 U.C.
74 Bricklin SV1 "Presto" AMC 360 pwrd.

I think supercharging is a dying technology. Lag used to be why you went blower, but with variable geometry, or even just sequential turbos, and tuned manifolds, lag just doesn't exist anymore.

Like the project btw, the charge piping came out really nice.

__________________
68 280SL - 70 280SL - 70 300SEL 3.5 - 72 350SL - 72 280SEL 4.5 - 72 220 - 72 220D - 73 450SL - 84 230GE - 87 200TD - 90 190E 2.0 - 03 G500

Nissan GTR - Nissan Skyline GTS25T - Toyota GTFour - Rover Mini - Toyota Land Cruiser HJ60 - Cadillac Eldorado - BMW E30 - BMW 135i

Although I would probably go with turbos if starting from scratch at this point. Superchargers still have their place. Turbos still come on hard and are not as linear in control. And if you are going for big power turbos still have lag. Not as much but they do. Even vnt setups which can boost very low still come on hard. If you have enough computer ability to control then fine. I still like the linear aspect of superchargers. Stump pulling torque that is controllable.

I took the maf unit out off it case and stick it infront of the turbo inlet
then i have a idle problem
i guess that since the inlet size is 4inch the maf cant sense the air stream so i block half of the inlet pipe with my hand then the engine seem to act normal good idle
i need some advise about this issue please

this is the problem , 4inch is too big, you can use the original maf with reducer hose from 4in to 3in

__________________
W123 - M111+Turbo

Thanks
The AFR kit show that it pretty LEAN at idle something 17.0:1 or 1.16 Lamda
So i decide to try adding fuel and the engine react much better

I will contact Mercedes shop to find out why the idle is bad ( already check my MAF and it working on my 210)

But since the AFR kit show that it super LEAN so I think adding fuel isn't going to hurt anyone right?

Next Tuesday I will test run it again.

More Picture
I choose to bent the intake as less as I can so I curve in over


Try my best to make sure there are no 90degree bend in my system


The PCV system plug


Link it to the inlet pipe

with bigger MAF there is an air stream the ecu can't read, so it will think that the engine is getting less air so it will inject less fuel which will lead to lean condition.
did you try it on w210 with the 4inch case?

and those are awesome welds

__________________
W123 - M111+Turbo

I took out the interpipe at the last section and stick the OEM MAF (that I already test on 210) there
which I think it suppose to work fine because I did bypass the turbo
but turn out that the ECU can't recognize the presence of the MAF anymore at idle

I took the car out for a test and set a cruise control at 120 km/h then everything work fine
The ECU keep trimming the fuel up and down every 1-2 sec loop
I have no idea where the ECU take the data to manage the fuel but even with the MAF problem at idle the engine still run pretty good as you can see in the VIDEO
Perhaps the ECU may running on it memory lol


This is the VIDEO of the AFR at work
AFR kit at work W124 Mercedes - YouTube

Just bought myself a turbo blanket and 4" HKS replica filter



My Split second fuel map which I choose to go with the highest duty cycle first and will trim it down bit by bit

did you fix the maf problem?

__________________
W123 - M111+Turbo

No

I just add 1.5 mil second of fuel at 0-500 rpm which turn out very lovely

The engine run super smooth at idle now

BUT

For some reason the adding fuel raise the RPM to 900-1000 rpm
It seem like my turbo adding extra air in to the system and make it lean
and when I give them a fuel they gain them self more power to suck the air in

My engine idle around 600 rpm at -18hmg and slowly climb up to 1000 rpm with -20hmg
So I change my fuel in to -18 hmg=1.5mil -19 hmg=1mil -20้ hmg=0mil
to prevent it from gaining power
The engine then keep a smooth idle at 600-750 up and down

I quiet happy with it now and going to make a video of 0-200 km/h acceleration and will share it here very soon.

This is the video of the car at idle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NW90bWN0L-c&feature=youtu.be

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMVo8d_FeCk&feature=youtu.be

Clean car for 550,000KM!

Love the project, nice work

__________________
68 280SL - 70 280SL - 70 300SEL 3.5 - 72 350SL - 72 280SEL 4.5 - 72 220 - 72 220D - 73 450SL - 84 230GE - 87 200TD - 90 190E 2.0 - 03 G500

Nissan GTR - Nissan Skyline GTS25T - Toyota GTFour - Rover Mini - Toyota Land Cruiser HJ60 - Cadillac Eldorado - BMW E30 - BMW 135i

Oh sorry
I just messing all of those number while I took it out for repairing actually it 250000 something.
By the way I refinished the whole interior last year which cost me around 1900$. I want to add some dark tone to it.

With Dark Cherry CDI wood trim + Light creme SLK leather + Chocolate carpet