Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Performance Paddock

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-1999, 03:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: ajax, ontario, canada
Posts: 773
i've noticed that when i really push my 190e2.6 from rest, that it is a bit sluggish below 3000rpm. I haven't seen any chart showing the 2.6's torque curve, but i suspect that it is peaky, with a documented peak of 162lbs-ft@4600rpm. The car is a 1989 model, with a 2-valve design, and it does not appear to have any sort of variable induction. It appears to be tuned for the higher rpms, judging from the length of the intake runners.

what is a recommended method of improving low-rpm torque or throttle response? Will a bigger throttle body do the job? Aside from cost-effectiveness, an important consideration for me is one that will not sufficiently compromise engine longevity.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-1999, 05:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,342
Bobby,
That generation of engine just didn't have low end grunt. A bigger throttle body will actually hurt low end power but help top end a small bit. You can run a bit of nitrous or have a larger displacement engine rebuild. Either of those should help the power tremendously. There isn't much you can do off the line, but keeping the tranny in a lower gear longer (with the shifter or bowden cable adjustment) will help "throttle response"

Hope that helps...Lee
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-1999, 08:38 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tucker, Ga USA
Posts: 12,153
The M103 engines were designed as autobahn cruisers, so top end was the idea. Also w/o overdrive in auto trans the cars suffer even more. Over 75 percent of euro buyers bought 5-speed cars, better rear ratio & overdrive in 5th. unless you can find a cam regrinder that can regrind the cam for more torque, just keep the "revs" up in the good range.

------------------
MERCEDES BENZ MASTER GUILD TECHNICIAN
ASE MASTER TECHNICIAN
27 YEARS DEALER M.B. TECH
190E 2.3 ITS RACECAR


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-1999, 11:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: southern pines NC
Posts: 35
I also have a 190E2.6 (1992) that exhibits the same loss of grunt at full throttle starts. During regular acceleration it is more responsive. I have heard this complaint from others with this motor (2.6 & 3.0). I am suspecting loss of intake charge velosity and have always wondered if advancing my cam +4 degrees or finding a torque converter with a higher stall speed might help recover some low end power. Ideas are welcome.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EHA current, Vacuum, throttle response zorin Tech Help 1 05-26-2004 12:04 AM
2000 C280 Poor throttle response RobertR Tech Help 6 04-01-2003 10:00 AM
Poor throttle response, hard start zorin Tech Help 0 02-16-2003 11:25 AM
'82 300D flat throttle response to a certain point Sparky Tech Help 1 07-18-2002 12:56 PM
No Throttle Response on Cold Start/'87 560SEL jcantor Tech Help 0 07-15-2002 12:58 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page