Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2006, 08:07 AM
mrhills0146
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question Bio vs. Dino-Diesel: Real or Imagined?

The "service station" closest to my office just happens to offer B20 as well as dino-Diesel. Now isn't that nice!

So I've alternated between tanks of B20 and Dino, and it seems to me that I get roughly 1.5 MPG better fuel mileage on Dino-Diesel, but the car runs smoother - considerably so - on B20.

Have any of you out there run B20 versus Dino? Do you notice the same effect or is it simply psychosomatic on my part? I like running B20 as it costs exactly the same per gallon as Dino but with only 20% concentration of Bio, I suspect that I may be imagining and convincing myself of the smoother running.

Cheers!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2006, 08:16 AM
raMBow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 505
It's not in your head.

I too get better mileage on the Dino (have not checked but for me it seems like it is a few mpg), but I like the muted purr of the B20 and it's cleansing abilities. Have been running mostly B20 for a couple of years now (15,000 miles +-) and just did the filters this past weekend, two small black specks in the pre-filter only.
__________________
raMBow

1999 E300DT Obsydian Black Metallic, Heated Full Leather Parchment options, E2, K2, 136,000+, best 36.5 mpg - GP's 12-04 & 11-12 Zero Stuck
2010 Honda Odyssey - The BrideMobile - best 26.5
(2) 2005 Honday Accord- (1 -Corporate 1 - Personal) - 110,000 4-cyl 30mpg
2000 VW Golf GLS TDI, Upsolute Chip (sold to Brother, now 300+k on it) 48.5 mpg like clock work
1987 Honda CRX HF - Sold 87,000 always over 50 mpg Max 67 mpg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2006, 08:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Yep, lots of us have run bio some of us even make the stuff in our garages, and some of us are running straight vegetable oil (svo), or waste vegetable oil (wvo). Your mpg findings and smoother running observations are right on.

If you use the search function for the threads you can find out a lot more, as most guys expect you to do that first, and ask when you get stumped.

READ, SEARCH, READ, SEARCH.

But it' nice to have you around. Just be careful, bio acts as a solvent so you need to read up on what fuel lines you have and make sure it wont degrade yours. Also, some of the guys recomend changing filters more often because the bio will nock the deposits in your tank and lines loose.

Happy searching
__________________
83' 300D Turbo - resurection in progress...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2006, 08:50 AM
mrhills0146
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I do not plan to run WVO or SVO until I see a TSB from Mercedes that approves its use.

However, thanks for the tips regarding B20. I can't imagine that a mere 20% concentration will degrade rubber fuel lines. If I ran B80 or B100 that would be a different story, but I'll keep an eye on the fuel lines without expecting to change them for B20.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2006, 09:11 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Maine
Posts: 165
Rubber

Those fuel lines are going to age, crack and deteriorate on their own. It won't have anything to do with B20. Well, hardly anything.

Those of us running B100 just accept the fact that it may mean we have to replace 20 bucks worth of fuel hose at year 4 instead of year 10.

JP
__________________
________
1985 300SD
2001 Toyota Tundra - soon to be replaced with diesel truck
2006 Honda CRV
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2006, 09:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrhills0146 View Post
I do not plan to run WVO or SVO until I see a TSB from Mercedes that approves its use.
I doubt MB will ever release TSB that will approve it, due to the fact that it would require money to research the WVO, SVO usage and that's money they wouldnt recover. However, If you google around the web, you will find that ,the opinion is widely held, the MB 5 cyl. is one of the best candidates for the grease car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrhills0146 View Post
However, thanks for the tips regarding B20. I can't imagine that a mere 20% concentration will degrade rubber fuel lines. If I ran B80 or B100 that would be a different story, but I'll keep an eye on the fuel lines without expecting to change them for B20.
I dont think its the concetration per gallon but the total amount over time that causes the degredation of natural rubber. Once again, this information is readily available through the search function and other websites through googling.

I personally have run B100 in my tank once and continue to mix B50 for my everyday use, and have just had my first hose replacements. My return lines have swollen and do not fit properly around the orfice on the injectors.

but dont take my word for it......search a little
__________________
83' 300D Turbo - resurection in progress...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2006, 11:18 AM
ConnClark's Avatar
Power User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,123
B20 has less BTUs than dino diesel that is why your mileage drops. Now if they made B20 using animal fats it would have a higher BTU content and you would get better mileage.
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-16-2006, 11:27 AM
mrhills0146
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Conn.

Mileage drop is so small that it may often be offset by changes in driving patterns, running the A/C, and so on.

I'll trade 1 extra MPG for smoother running any day.

FYI - last tank of got 26.88 MPG on a mix of city/highway with AC running. On the last tank of B20 it was 26.01. I cannot complain.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-16-2006, 03:07 PM
Old300D's Avatar
Biodiesel Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeinGreaseCar View Post
Those fuel lines are going to age, crack and deteriorate on their own. It won't have anything to do with B20. Well, hardly anything.

Those of us running B100 just accept the fact that it may mean we have to replace 20 bucks worth of fuel hose at year 4 instead of year 10.

JP
Yes, B20 is very benign. I noticed no (extra) leaks when I first started filling with B20, then blending B100 to B20 or B30 into my tank when I wanted more. And if you replace hoses with Viton, you don't have to worry about them for a long while.
__________________
'83 240D with 617.952 and 2.88
'01 VW Beetle TDI
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD
'89 Toyota 4x4, needs 2L-T
'78 280Z with L28ET - 12.86@110
Oil Burner Kartel #35

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b1...oD/bioclip.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-16-2006, 03:13 PM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
I run ~B50 without a signifigant hit on power or economy. And it sure runs quieter.
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-16-2006, 03:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
B20 has less BTUs than dino diesel that is why your mileage drops. Now if they made B20 using animal fats it would have a higher BTU content and you would get better mileage.
Can you make Bio out of waste cooking oil that contains animal fat?

I have access to as much of that as I can use. If so, I am going to start colecting it.
__________________
83' 300D Turbo - resurection in progress...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-16-2006, 03:16 PM
Cabernet red, actually
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Willamette Valley, OR
Posts: 503
Quote:
Originally Posted by winmutt View Post
I run ~B50 without a signifigant hit on power or economy. And it sure runs quieter.
I'm wondering whether B20 should really make much of a differnce mileage-wise. When I run B99 I tend to get about 24 mpg as opposed to 25. I would think that with B20 the difference would be about .2 gallons for my car...
__________________
Ralph

1985 300D Turbo, CA model
248,650 miles and counting...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-16-2006, 03:28 PM
mrhills0146
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Maroon:

That is what I'm saying - the 0.8 MPG difference between B20 and dinodiesel that I saw on the last comparison may have nothing at all to do with different fuel. It could be different mix of driving, different amounts of pressure applied to the vertical pedal on the right, different use of A/C, any number of things.

I most definitely am surprised that the car runs so much smoother on B20. Would like to try a few tanks of stronger concentrations but can't find it anywhere around Atlanta. Sheer luck that the station near my office offers B20 - for the same price as 100% dinosaur juice.

I've searched all over the web locating bio stations - if anyone knows of locations offering other than B20 in Atlanta, I'm all ears.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-16-2006, 04:22 PM
ConnClark's Avatar
Power User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by a_merc View Post
Can you make Bio out of waste cooking oil that contains animal fat?

I have access to as much of that as I can use. If so, I am going to start colecting it.
Yes you can though I haven't done it. Animal fats gell up at a higher temperature so I woun't try this in a very cold climate.

http://www.rendermagazine.com/February2006/AnimalFatsPerformWell.pdf

EDIT: Note B20 has about 2% less BTU's than dino diesel, B100 has about 7% less.
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-16-2006, 04:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 41
Biodiesel has less BTU's then Low sulphur diesel(LSD). However Ultra low sulphur diesel(ULSD) has less BTU's also. ULSD will also degrade natural rubber fuel lines. In North America all OEM's switched to synthetic lines in 1993. As far as fuel economy some users are getting better mileage from low level blends(like B20) due to higher Cetane, higher Lubricity , and Biodiesel is 11% Oxygen by volume. These three properties combine to produce a more complete burn of the petroldiesel portion of the fuel.

Gary T

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page