Quote:
Originally Posted by Rebe
Can anyone tell me on a 300E is it mandatory to replace the rotors if you are installing new brake pads? I seem to get so much dust on the front wheels that I can hardly believe there could be any pads left. It's a constant battle to try and keep the wheels looking half way decent.
|
Just think of that black dust as a "design feature." It seems to be common to German cars including VW and BMW. It is shocking, when you get your first MB, to see the impressive amt. of brake dust these beasts generate. As with everything automotive, as elsewhere in life, it's a compromise. The engineers who designed your car made a conscious decision to use soft pads to maximize braking under real-world conditions. They have a great "bite" and are generally smooth and quiet. Remember that those same engineers are designing cars which must be able to repeatedly slow or stop a vehicle safely from Autobahn speeds without excessive brake fade. The downside, of course, is lots of dust.
Lots of people are happy with PBRs and similar pads. Personally, I don't want to second-guess the factory engineers, esp. when I've read that PBRs are suboptimal when wet (one writer on another list called them "Pathetic Braking in the Rain" pads...)
Getting back to your original question, no, rotors don't necessarily need replacement with each pad change. There are clear specs for rotor thickness, and as Ed C says, this almost always seems to equate to replacing rotors every other pad change.
|