![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
filling clutch
i just read this thread and i was wondering if i have a viscous clutch?how do i fill the cluch and with what fluid?
car is '95 s500
__________________
'95 s500 (bought for wife but can't bear to share!!!) 125kms '92 legend 180kms '88 tbirdturbo(fantastic car-only regular maint.)120kms '87 mustang gt(gone) '86 tbirdturbo(gone) '85 mustang gt(gone-but not forgotten) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Rory
Sorry for the name confusion thing ![]() ![]() Hi daddyiojiggy - welcome to the thread. Wow, that must have been a mamouth read if you started from the beginning! Both the 119.970 and 119.980 have the MB clutch 119 200 00 22 which is identical to mine - not surprising since my SL500 engine is a 119.972 I suppose... Here's a post I made about refilling over on the SL forum Viscous clutch/fan repair I used Dow Cow Corning 200 Fluid but the recommended VFC fluid is Dow Corning 211. The 200 has identical viscous temperature characteristics but comparing data sheets the 211 may have better sheer strength and high temperature properties than 200. Simply remove the pin and use a 5ml syringe, I pumped in around 30ml on my first refill and 40ml on my second - of course the vloume is debatable and so I simply kept filling until it started to significantly tighten. One obvious thing I have learnt is that if you need to refill, then the clutch has a leak - and I know of no repair. The leak emanates from the centre bearing and over time gives the inside of your fan shroud an unwanted fine coat of silicone! Hope this is of some use.. Lea
__________________
'93 R129 500SL-32 '89 190E 2.6 - sold in 2002 http://antron.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/i...nature/Sig.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A little more news about the bimetal. G.RAU have confirmed that both the TB1577-AGE and -GE are indeed manufactured by them and that the TB1577-AGE is designed to meet DIN1715 TB1577A specifications.
However G.RAU mentioned that the TB1577-GE cross references to their part TB1577B-GE which sounds a little strange to me. I'm awaiting confirmation. I'll attempt to download a copy of DIN 1715 again, but I'm struggling finding a freebie as I don't really want to spend out 60USD ![]() Lea
__________________
'93 R129 500SL-32 '89 190E 2.6 - sold in 2002 http://antron.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/i...nature/Sig.jpg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I received confirmation by G.RAU that their bimetals marked TB1577GE are crossed referenced to DIN 1715 TB1577B.
However we still have no full standard to review the Coefficient of Expansion (CoE) between the A and B specs - although I have found a snippet detailing some specs (in German), see attached. I can't quite understand the left hand column, is it saying that the meterial is different between the two? Is it a percentage/ratio of the composition? G.RAU's product literature implies the only difference between A and B is simply the stress characteristics.... not the CoE ... interesting..... I need to translate the DIN spec so another job for latter today... I'll order my new VFC this weekend (hopefully) and of course will post any findings here too.....should anyone really care... ![]() ![]() If the the new VFC allows the coolant to run at 110C as others then guess I'll have to send it back to Benz! I figure if I buy from my local dealer I won't have an issue resolving temperature issues should this be the case - but there is a reasonable price penalty of course! Lea
__________________
'93 R129 500SL-32 '89 190E 2.6 - sold in 2002 http://antron.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/i...nature/Sig.jpg Last edited by LeaUK; 05-26-2005 at 02:39 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Although the partial DIN 1715 spec I attached earlier is of poor visual quality, I really should have read it with a little more attention!
At the bottom, we can clearly see the metal composition between A and B is different (Kanthal specs also show this as 0.5Cu is added), however the specific deflection is identical at 15.5 for both. Also, compare this with both TB1577A/B products from Kanthal (155TB1577 and 155CTB1577), these have the a specific deflection of 15.6 each. More to the point, my VFC has no A marking, G.RAU have confirmed that this indicates it's a B part and so we now know that A=B=15.5 specific deflection ![]() So, one could conclude that although the alloy composition is different between A and B, the deflection is identical and therefore although my car has a different bms to others it's CoE is the SAME, contrary to what others have previously hypothesised!! Therefore, when Mercedes changed from 119 200 00 22 to 119 200 01 22 on the 500E/E500 they did NOT change the bms because this wasn't required, they changed the airflow/temperature characteristics surrounding the VFC - or/and perhaps the internal characteristics of the VFC. Also, a few posts previous shows how the viscosity of the silicone fluid within the clutch can significantly change with temperature - bringing me back to my original thoughts of VFC fin and cowl design. The VFC's locking point is NOT solely dependant on the bms, there are many factors significantly influencing this. If I could get a reply from Sachs I would love to hear what the changes are between our VFCs and the 'Tropical' versions - because my bet would be no change in the bms..however they refuse to answer by email ![]() Lea
__________________
'93 R129 500SL-32 '89 190E 2.6 - sold in 2002 http://antron.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/i...nature/Sig.jpg Last edited by LeaUK; 05-30-2005 at 05:41 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Firstly, after picking up my cowl I soon realised that it couldn't be fitted as the plastic clips had all suffered and most had broken... I did try
![]() Anyway, guess what I received and fitted today!? A brand new OE Benz 119 200 00 22. Note that this unit's bms has the Horton part number 60 2100 013 001 but the SACHS stamp on the rear of the aluminium housing! I've not considered Horton before or how they fit within the dealer supplier relationship but the part number does seem to resemble the Sach's structure, although not directly listed by Sachs - I'll look into Horton later So, moving on, here are a few pictures: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Anyone for a closer look at the bms? ![]() Let's start by observing the new VFC: 1. No MB part number on the bms. 2. Horton sticker on the bms 3. Dimensionally identical to my previous VFC 4. Sachs stamped on rear 5. 'Top' marking on the box 6. bms marked TB1577 A-GE- 7. bms looks slightly more 'yellow' than previous 8. Identical cowl design 9. New VFC has significantly less friction. Can spin the fan 1.5-2 turns by hand. My old VFC turned only 0.5 turn. After some testing today I can report the following: 1. New VFC cuts in at a smidge over 95C, as displayed on my coolant gauge - previous VFC cut in at 85C. 2. Under my normal driving conditions (todays 18C ambient with a mixture of urban and light motorway) coolant temperature stabilised at 90C-95C, VFC NOT locked - perfect engine temperature! 3. I had trouble increasing the coolant temperature to 100C but today I also needed to check exhaust emissions so the cat required a pre-heat - this simply means driving hard in second gear for around 15 minutes . VFC cut in at 95C-98C and the roar was evident. 4. After cat pre-heat conditioning and back to idle, coolant temperature increased to 100C. Car was left idling (waiting for Emissions Inspector) for around 5 minutes. Coolant temperature stabilised at 100C. VFC could be heard switching in and out. My thoughts: The new VFC operates perfectly and exactly as described by the MB documentation - a little relief It does however operate at a slightly higher temperature then my previous VFC, BUT, the previous VFC was refilled (volume was guessed) with an alternative silicone fluid and had no cowl fitted. So, for now I conclude that for the R129 129.067 (Euro spec) M119.972 a VFC purchased from MB, part number 119.200.022, operates perfectly ![]() Enjoy! Lea
__________________
'93 R129 500SL-32 '89 190E 2.6 - sold in 2002 http://antron.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/i...nature/Sig.jpg Last edited by LeaUK; 06-05-2005 at 02:39 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
norton not horton
i think the sticker says norton as in the abrasive company.not sure if that matters, though.
![]()
__________________
'95 s500 (bought for wife but can't bear to share!!!) 125kms '92 legend 180kms '88 tbirdturbo(fantastic car-only regular maint.)120kms '87 mustang gt(gone) '86 tbirdturbo(gone) '85 mustang gt(gone-but not forgotten) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Lea,
Glad to hear that all ended up well. I never did have any doubt that once you change out your VFC, your coolant temperature will than be back to normal. I am not clear however as to whether or not you received the newly redesigned VFC or the original design VFC. I will also be extremely interested in knowing whether or not your new bms has the identical bending characteristics as the original bms. Phil
__________________
'95 E300 Diesel, 264,000 Miles. [Sold it] Last edited by pberku; 06-05-2005 at 01:36 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TRUCKTEC clutch fan
Hi,
I have a 96 E230 W210. My car's temp was usually running at 95-100 even in cold weather. My mechanic said it was a faulty clutch fan. I just went to an aftermarket Mercedes parts shop and sold me a TRUCKTEC visco fan which they claimned as a TROPICALIZED version. it is a replacement (made in Germany) part with a mercedes part number reference. The part is cheap at around $92. The Sachs version was a lot more expensive. Now, the car runs at 80-82 even in traffic with the A/C on. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
replaced fan clutch - is new clutch defective? | janko | Tech Help | 13 | 07-08-2005 01:05 PM |
Can you remove fan clutch bracket with fan clutch still attached? | brewtoo | Tech Help | 4 | 01-30-2005 11:44 PM |
DIY Notes may help people: Radiator, Fan Clutch, Temp Sensors, Fuel Pump, Temp Gauge | ericgr | Mercedes-Benz SL Discussion Forum | 3 | 09-24-2004 01:40 AM |
Any reason to leave a fan with a dead clutch installed? | The Warden | Diesel Discussion | 17 | 12-22-2003 07:28 AM |
Auxiliary Fan Question | JBoggs | Tech Help | 9 | 07-30-2003 10:07 PM |