|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
126 differential interchangeability
Anyone know if a '91 420SEL diffy will bolt up to a '91 300SE chassis?
I know the ratios are hugely different, 2.47 vs 3.46, but that's the mad project I have in mind. Tks, DG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I can't imagine why it would not fit. Same chassis.
But, it sure will be interesting to see that 300 push the W126 with a 2.47 installed. Better wire the hazards permanently ON. Did you figure a way to get it to start in 1st?? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yep, you're getting the wild idea. I'm sooo tired of doing 3500 at 70.
Fix it to start in 1st gear, gain 15% torque over the current 2nd gear start, cruise at 2500 in 4th instead of 3500. No hills in Texas. I've been chewing up gas, and all the belt-driven accessories for so long, I'm gonna try this. Maybe. Found a diffy on ebay for $99, just might take a chance and bolt it in, see what happens. DG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I'm very curious to see how it does. I'm really wondering if you can get 25 mpg on the highway? The diesels do a bit better than this, but, the cost of diesel fuel offsets the benefit.
How are you going to get the first gear start?? |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
They all should bolt up. A W126 is a W126. I can't think of a reason why it wouldn't be a direct swap.
After you do it please post 0-60 times and MPG figures. It would be very interesting to see the results.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
i predict
that the acceleration will be a bit leasurely but it will be fine. and i think mid twenties will be possible if you dont drive too fast. say, 75.
tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Remember when...?
You could order a Nova, a Chevelle or an Impala with a six, about three or four different V8 engines (in many different stages of tune), various transmissions and almost any final drive ratio you wanted?
There must have been a reason why that rear end was not available as an option in '91. I can only guess that performance/reliability up and down hills (much less MOUNTAINS) will suffer. If you live where it is good (?) and flat you may see no real ill effects except a certain loss of UMMMMPHHH! at takeoff? Shouldn't hurt your gas mileage... Cheers!
__________________
'91 420 SEL @ 199K, '92 SVX @ 181K, '93 SC400 @ 86K, '93 Kaw ZX-11 @ 30K, '87 F250 @ 181K , 2001 Valkyrie Interstate @ 6K, Y2K Honda NightHawk 250 with 1.5K, '88 420SEL I.@ 179K & the 2nd latest, an '88 420SEL II.@ 210K runnin' parts car, '85 F150 300/NP435 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Well guys, I chickened out on the diffy swap - again.
I would need to make it start in 1st gear everytime, and reading some old posts about that modification were not too reassuring. But the copncept seemed sound - gear up 40%, then start off in 1st and actually get 15% lower gearing on take-off. Then get 40% overdrive in 4th. I compared the proposed gearing, and it almost matches exactly the 1-2-3-4gearing on my little PT Cruiser. That little 2.4L pulls the 3200 lb PT really well, so I thought the 3.0 might ease the 4000lb SE along sufficiently.. I did a search on 1st-gear starting. There were some old references to Bergwerks having an electrical shift-mod method, but I can't find that website anymore. There was a guy who modified valve bodies for $500, don't know if he is still performing that service. He shot down the quick/easy method of changing one spring in the valve body - said it would not be satisfactory. Then there's the question of "would the 1-2 shift be acceptable on a daily basis". It can be pretty jarring at anything more than 1/8 throttle. Then, "would the 420 diffy fit for sure", and be in good shape out of a used car, and "could I successfully re-calibrate the speedo". Then, "could the little engine successfully pull the car along without having to downshift to 3rd all the time". Ha, I had an old Eldo with the 4.1L that downshifted when I met a truck! So, maybe i'll just apply the 150th coat of wax to the Benz, and keep it as the Town Car. after 14 years of good service for us, it probably needs a rest from the long trips anyway. DG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If you reconsider, maybe 2.65 better so the car will pull in top gear on the highway. 3.46 to 2.65 still a pretty big drop. I did 3.15 to 2.65 and it was just about perfect. Regards, Jerry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I say go for it. I recently changed the diff in my 1984 399SD from a 3.07:1 to 2.47:1. Although my 0-60 time increased by 2 seconds (was 11 sec, now 13 sec), the car does not "feel" any slower than it did before. Driving down the highway it feels like a totally different car - it is very quiet and relaxed. I guess I should quantify my thoughts on acceleration. With the 3.07 diff, I always thought the car was slow. I never raced cars away from stop lights - what's the use? I thought the 2.47 diff would really bog the engine down, but it didn't. Granted, mine always starts in 1st, but you would have a hard time guessing which diff I had in. Before Thanksgiving (and before I switched the diffs) I drove 1600 miles Chicago -> Mississippi and back. While it was physically comfortable to sit in the car for 12 hours at a time, the engine screaming at 3500rpm wore me out. With the new diff, the engine turns 2600rpm @ 70mph. As far as the speedo, there are several "black boxes" that can take the current speedo signal and step it up or down to give you a correct reading. They cost around $100 - if you have the ability to change the diff yourself, you should be able to program the box. I say go for it. If you don't like it, you can always change it back. Everything is easier the second time around. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I suspect that you are referring to a W124?? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Regards, Jerry |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|