Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2007, 10:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 683
Red face Unexpected Steering Complication.

I just replaced both tie rod assemblies (inner and outer on right and left sides) on the 190E. Consequently, the steering wants to 'stick' (not return) when turned sharply to either the left or right. It is as though the tie rods are bolted on too tightly.

Can anyone tell me what might cause this condition?

Many thanks,

Earl



__________________
Earl



1993 190E 2.3
2000 Toyota 4x4 Tundra

Last edited by ejsharp; 11-26-2007 at 10:45 AM. Reason: Left out a word
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2007, 12:11 PM
david s poole
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,822
did you fit the new ones exactly the way the old ones came off?have you jacked up the car and had some one turn the steering so you can see what's binding?i suspect you have fitted the tie rod end from the top or the bottom when they should be reversed.
__________________
David S Poole
European Performance
Dallas, TX
4696880422

"Fortune favors the prepared mind"
1987 Mercedes Benz 420SEL
1988 Mercedes Benz 300TE (With new evaporator)
2000 Mercedes Benz C280
http://www.w108.org/gallery/albums/A...1159.thumb.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2007, 12:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 683
I believe that I have them exactly as they were before replacement. If I had to guess I would say that the damper in the connector rod might be shot and therefore not 'pushing back' on the tie rods.

Earl
__________________
Earl



1993 190E 2.3
2000 Toyota 4x4 Tundra
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:15 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,632
Perhaps you have them twisted enough that it is binding.

Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 683
No... nothing is twisted. However I did also install new struts to the front end. But They seem to be OK... Could the alignment be seriously off enough as a consequence of the new struts, to cause the described condition?
__________________
Earl



1993 190E 2.3
2000 Toyota 4x4 Tundra
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 683
I would think that it is not possible to put the posts, of the tie rod ends, in upside down.

Will the taper allow them to be bolted in upside down? Should the posts of the inside tie rod ends be pointing up or down? (On the 190).
__________________
Earl



1993 190E 2.3
2000 Toyota 4x4 Tundra
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 12
the problem might be in your steering box, the balancing valve might be sticking or one of the springs in it might be broken
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:55 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Tucker, Ga USA
Posts: 12,153
If the steering was OK & now isn't..then the lengths of the tie-rod assemblies IS the most likely problem.
__________________
MERCEDES Benz Master Guild Technician (6 TIMES)
ASE Master Technician
Mercedes Benz Star Technician (2 times)
44 years foreign automotive repair
27 Years M.B. Shop foreman (dealer)
MB technical information Specialist (15 years)
190E 2.3 16V ITS SCCA race car (sold)
1986 190E 2.3 16V 2.5 (sold)
Retired Moderator
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2007, 11:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 683
Yes Doc... things were OK before I changed the tie rods. I say that with a qualifier because I changed the struts at the same time that I installed the new tie rods. I took advantage of the car being up on jacks. I tried to make the new rods the same length as the old ones... laid old and new side by side and adjusted new to the old.

Maybe the new struts along with imprecise lengths of the new rods combine to cause the problem. A neighbor around the corner does alignments so I'll ask him to take the car in and check it out.

Thanks for your reply.
__________________
Earl



1993 190E 2.3
2000 Toyota 4x4 Tundra
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-27-2007, 12:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 683
Yes Doc... things were OK before I changed the tie rods. I say that with a qualifier because I changed the struts at the same time that I installed the new tie rods. I took advantage of the car being up on jacks. I tried to make the new rods the same length as the old ones... laid old and new side by side and adjusted new to the old.

Maybe the new struts along with imprecise lengths of the new rods combine to cause the problem. A neighbor around the corner does alignments so I'll ask him to take the car in, check it out and do the alignment. He did a good job aligning my 300E both front and rear some years ago.

Thanks to everyone for your replies.
__________________
Earl



1993 190E 2.3
2000 Toyota 4x4 Tundra
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-27-2007, 06:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,971
FWIW I think the caster affects the wheels "desire" to go straight again. Once a long time ago I had the alignment done on a Celica, and afterwards it would seem to hold whatever degree of turn you made, kind of like what you are describing. I don't know why but I suspected the tires and/or the caster. I don't know if toe-in could affect this. You did the right thing by making the new ones the same as the old. Of course that is an inexact science and also since the old ones were worn it might be hard to compare the bew ones exactly. The suggestion to jack it up and look for binding is good but you might not find any. Maybe the caster is off a bit and the new tighter joints are making that more apparent? Well I am just guessing here of course......
__________________
1998 C230 330,000 miles (currently dead of second failed EIS, yours will fail too, turning you into the dealer's personal human cash machine)
1988 F150 144,000 miles (leaks all the colors of the rainbow)
Previous stars: 1981 Brava 210,000 miles, 1978 128 150,000 miles, 1977 B200 Van 175,000 miles, 1972 Vega (great, if rusty, car), 1972 Celica, 1986.5 Supra
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-27-2007, 11:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Accokeek, MD
Posts: 683
Thanks mpolli... I like your guess. I have a gut feeling that you are right.

My hunch has been leaning in the same direction.


__________________
Earl



1993 190E 2.3
2000 Toyota 4x4 Tundra
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page